Welcome to Collingwood Taylor Adams

All trade and draft talk here thanks..... this means you DTM!!!!

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
User avatar
Lazza
Posts: 12836
Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2003 8:01 pm
Location: Bendigo, Victoria, Australia

Post by Lazza »

jackcass wrote:Good deal for both clubs.
You honestly happy about losing Heater Daz??

I remain uncertain as what to feel especially as I know **** all about this Adams....... :roll:
Top
User avatar
eddiesmith
Posts: 12392
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 12:21 am
Location: Lexus Centre
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 24 times

Post by eddiesmith »

Good to get away with the straight swap, it is a strange one the paying part of his contract, yes it is minimal but its usually when a high paid player is no longer wanted at his club and the new club wont pay what he is currently contracted on, have to be a first the old club paying part of a contract for a player who has left for more money...
Top
User avatar
Lazza
Posts: 12836
Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2003 8:01 pm
Location: Bendigo, Victoria, Australia

Post by Lazza »

Culprit wrote:
Johnno75 wrote:
Culprit wrote:We will be paying a percentage of Shaw's income for two years. That's the sugar that got GWS to agree
Bingo. I was thinking last night how else the Pies could sweeten the deal without additional players or picks.
It's clever and not a massive cost.
Sorry but how do you know this for a fact without actually knowing the exact figure???... :roll: :shock:
Top
User avatar
Raw Hammer
Posts: 7353
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:54 pm
Location: The Gutter
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 4 times

Post by Raw Hammer »

Trust the club, lazza.

Adams is a gun. Thomas wanted to go.

We'd be lucky to be paying close to 100% of the cap with all the senior exits and our young list, so nothing lost there
Est. 2002
Top
User avatar
swoop42
Posts: 22049
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 9:27 pm
Location: The 18
Been liked: 8 times

Post by swoop42 »

Who cares if we have to pay a small portion of his wage for two years if it means we get Adams and Shaw gets to go to the club of his choice.

Better outcome than if he went to Geelong for Collingwood and Shaw.
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD!
Top
User avatar
Culprit
Posts: 17235
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 8:01 pm
Location: Port Melbourne
Has liked: 57 times
Been liked: 68 times

Post by Culprit »

Lazza wrote:
Culprit wrote:
Johnno75 wrote: Bingo. I was thinking last night how else the Pies could sweeten the deal without additional players or picks.
It's clever and not a massive cost.
Sorry but how do you know this for a fact without actually knowing the exact figure???... :roll: :shock:
Poor Lazza, how about we do the maths and I put it to you that Shaw was on 500k, we pick up Adams on lets say 400k that leaves 100k in the black. Now that 100k if that's the figure would be what they are given GWS for Shaw for two years. Reality no loss just a perception amongst the nuffys we are out of pocket.
Top
User avatar
Culprit
Posts: 17235
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 8:01 pm
Location: Port Melbourne
Has liked: 57 times
Been liked: 68 times

Post by Culprit »

swoop42 wrote:Who cares if we have to pay a small portion of his wage for two years if it means we get Adams and Shaw gets to go to the club of his choice.

Better outcome than if he went to Geelong for Collingwood and Shaw.
What we save on Adams contract is what is paid to GWS and for two years only.
Top
User avatar
Lazza
Posts: 12836
Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2003 8:01 pm
Location: Bendigo, Victoria, Australia

Post by Lazza »

Raw Hammer wrote:Trust the club, lazza.

Adams is a gun. Thomas wanted to go.

We'd be lucky to be paying close to 100% of the cap with all the senior exits and our young list, so nothing lost there
I have forgotten who traitor Thomas was, just that I didn't have too much knowledge about Adams. However I DO trust the club, Hine and in fact your judgement so that makes me quite happy.
Top
User avatar
Lazza
Posts: 12836
Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2003 8:01 pm
Location: Bendigo, Victoria, Australia

Post by Lazza »

Culprit wrote:
Lazza wrote:
Culprit wrote:It's clever and not a massive cost.
Sorry but how do you know this for a fact without actually knowing the exact figure???... :roll: :shock:
Poor Lazza, how about we do the maths and I put it to you that Shaw was on 500k, we pick up Adams on lets say 400k that leaves 100k in the black. Now that 100k if that's the figure would be what they are given GWS for Shaw for two years. Reality no loss just a perception amongst the nuffys we are out of pocket.
OK you can call me a bloody nuffy but doesn't that mean that WE still pay hundred grand x 2 for Heater at GWS? :roll:
Top
User avatar
jackcass
Posts: 12529
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:17 pm
Location: Bendigo

Post by jackcass »

Lazza wrote:
jackcass wrote:Good deal for both clubs.
You honestly happy about losing Heater Daz??

I remain uncertain as what to feel especially as I know **** all about this Adams....... :roll:
Heater leaving will be good for him and the team I think. That said, never happy to lose a player of his quality but I think getting Adams as compo definitely makes it easier to swallow.
Top
User avatar
Lazza
Posts: 12836
Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2003 8:01 pm
Location: Bendigo, Victoria, Australia

Post by Lazza »

jackcass wrote:
Lazza wrote:
jackcass wrote:Good deal for both clubs.
You honestly happy about losing Heater Daz??

I remain uncertain as what to feel especially as I know **** all about this Adams....... :roll:
Heater leaving will be good for him and the team I think. That said, never happy to lose a player of his quality but I think getting Adams as compo definitely makes it easier to swallow.
Hmmmmnnn.........fair enough............I think............. :cry: :( :?
Top
User avatar
3rd degree
Posts: 14200
Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2004 12:50 pm
Location: John Wren's tote
Contact:
Contact 3rd degree

Post by 3rd degree »

I reckon we should have been given Dean Brogan also.
" Ohhh Banksy and out comes the Note Book".

www.facebook/the hybernators
Top
User avatar
tomoleary
Posts: 3081
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 4:41 pm
Location: Rosanna

Post by tomoleary »

eddiesmith wrote:Good to get away with the straight swap, it is a strange one the paying part of his contract, yes it is minimal but its usually when a high paid player is no longer wanted at his club and the new club wont pay what he is currently contracted on, have to be a first the old club paying part of a contract for a player who has left for more money...
Heath didn't leave for more money, he was pushed out because of his behavior. Don't ever think Heath doesn't love Collingwood. He did everything he possibly could for the club and I've heard him talk about his love for the club on more than one occasion.
Top
User avatar
tomoleary
Posts: 3081
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 4:41 pm
Location: Rosanna

Post by tomoleary »

I'm just relieved that this stalemate is over.

A couple of years ago I would've been flabbergasted at the thought of losing Heath Shaw, Dale Thomas, Alan Didak and Darren Jolly. But I can sit here right now feeling very happy to have got Taylor Adams, Jesse White and have picks 6 and 10 in the up coming draft.

Fantastic work Collingwood.
Top
User avatar
Lazza
Posts: 12836
Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2003 8:01 pm
Location: Bendigo, Victoria, Australia

Post by Lazza »

tomoleary wrote:I'm just relieved that this stalemate is over.

A couple of years ago I would've been flabbergasted at the thought of losing Heath Shaw, Dale Thomas, Alan Didak and Darren Jolly. But I can sit here right now feeling very happy to have got Taylor Adams, Jesse White and have picks 6 and 10 in the up coming draft.

Fantastic work Collingwood.
You failerd to mention Benny boy!!

I'm still upset that Johhno didn't go around for one more year...... :cry:
Top
Post Reply

Return to “The Draft & Trade Moot (DTM) forum”