What Russell said is logical though. The collective "we" got caught up in the emotions of losing Beams & demanding blood.jackcass wrote:One of the more biased anti-Collingwood commentators so this must have been tough for him. Interesting that he really rates Crisp and I guess that highlights why people arrive at differing assessments, we all have our own opininions on the relative merits of the players in question.watt price tully wrote:I really don't like Dwayne Russell's commentary, I found him annoying. Having said that I'm surprised to find myself linking him here. He thought Collingwood was the trade winner. Here are his reasons:
http://media.mytalk.com.au/3AW/audio/16 ... nepies.mp3
At the end of the trading person we got:
1. Pick 5.
2. Greenwood
3. Varcoe
4. Crisp as well as picking up
5. Moore.
Thats a pretty good week & a half's work after losing H & Beams.
Greenwood after his best season, Crisp played 3 years (seconds & firsts) with the latter part of this year being his best & Varcoe showing he's over his injuries. I like Russell's logic here. Mind you flattery will get you everywhere.