Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board

Posted: **Thu Sep 08, 2011 9:33 pm**

Well if it is true not sure why its on a public forum.

Posted: **Thu Sep 08, 2011 9:44 pm**

There was no mention of it when Mick was on The Game Plan, they didn't make mention to any injury concern to do with Reid. The only issue they brought up was with Tarrant, Cummings was mentioning Tarrants ankle.

Posted: **Thu Sep 08, 2011 9:51 pm**

Hopefully it was just cramp. I was really confident when the side was announced, but now I'm a bit worried. If its a fair dinkum hammy, we could be in trouble, especially if Taz's ankle is still suspect.

Posted: **Thu Sep 08, 2011 9:59 pm**

unless someone at the club says something about this, I have no worries about this. I take all rumours as rumours until there is proof that it's real.

Posted: **Thu Sep 08, 2011 10:50 pm**

Ben Reid will 100% play this weekend, Pendles stated this on his facebook page tonight when answering questions fans were throwing at him...

Posted: **Thu Sep 08, 2011 10:57 pm**

Training tomorrow will either allay or heighten any fears over Reid's fitness

Posted: **Thu Sep 08, 2011 11:33 pm**

Wasn't it a closed training session anyway? Meaning no one should have been inside the 'G' where they trained?

Posted: **Thu Sep 08, 2011 11:35 pm**

Reckon its bullshit for sure.

Posted: **Fri Sep 09, 2011 12:04 am**

Hopefully it was a cramp, or if it was a hamstring strain perhaps he can sort a bit of it out before the game, and have him play less of a mobile role letting Taz go further up the ground with Lynch/Kennedy and Reid stay in the defensive 50.

If there is an issue, painkillers will make him play.

Posted: **Fri Sep 09, 2011 8:01 am**

Painkillers do nothing fora hammy.

If he misses it will be a big problem. Regardless of the conditions the Weagles will still play all 4 of their tall forwards right? Which means Reid must play.

Fingers crossed.

Posted: **Fri Sep 09, 2011 8:49 am**

if he has any hammy trouble at all he should not play - ask Bucks

one player should not cost us, we have Shaw coming back, and Neon. we will be right and...

there is always next week, and then the week after that to consider.

Posted: **Fri Sep 09, 2011 9:09 am**

^ If he did have issues, why didn't we name another tall to cover him?

Or did we name Goldsack incase, with an option to bring in say Fas?

Posted: **Fri Sep 09, 2011 9:11 am**

If he has a hamstring problem then why did we name him in the first place?

Posted: **Fri Sep 09, 2011 9:21 am**

magpie greg wrote:
Geoffy Pie wrote:Wasn't it a closed training session anyway? Meaning no one should have been inside the 'G' where they trained?
How is that relevant?

I'm guessing the question is - how would the bloke know then?

"Inside info" is usually BS.

Posted: **Fri Sep 09, 2011 9:24 am**

MM looked pretty comfortable on TV yest.... i think something probably did happen but it was a scare and nothing else.

Cramp maybe.

Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board

#20 Ben Reid