#35,#1 Jaidyn Stephenson
Moderator: bbmods
It turns out that he bet on 3 separate games. This wasn't a one-off. On a couple of occasions he got a friend to put the bet on. On another occasion he did it himself. Did he not know you weren't allowed to do this? Did he forget?
The talk about this being an anti-Collingwood thing is rubbish. Saying "he made a mistake", is also rubbish. 3 mistakes?
I think that the penalty is harsh but in the circumstances of him having placed 3 bets, it makes sense. Stevo's a great player but this was a dreadful error of judgment. His teammates, coaches, club and supporters are entitled to be angry with him.
The talk about this being an anti-Collingwood thing is rubbish. Saying "he made a mistake", is also rubbish. 3 mistakes?
I think that the penalty is harsh but in the circumstances of him having placed 3 bets, it makes sense. Stevo's a great player but this was a dreadful error of judgment. His teammates, coaches, club and supporters are entitled to be angry with him.
- Jezza
- Posts: 29547
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:28 pm
- Location: Ponsford End
- Has liked: 272 times
- Been liked: 359 times
Makes sense that the punishment was more severe than Heath Shaw's in 2011.Harrysz wrote:It turns out that he bet on 3 separate games. This wasn't a one-off. On a couple of occasions he got a friend to put the bet on. On another occasion he did it himself. Did he not know you weren't allowed to do this? Did he forget?
The talk about this being an anti-Collingwood thing is rubbish. Saying "he made a mistake", is also rubbish. 3 mistakes?
I think that the penalty is harsh but in the circumstances of him having placed 3 bets, it makes sense. Stevo's a great player but this was a dreadful error of judgment. His teammates, coaches, club and supporters are entitled to be angry with him.
I'm just shaking my head at how a player can get himself involved in this mess when the AFL and the clubs drum it into players heads that they're prohibited from betting on football games.
| 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 |
- tbaker
- Posts: 1211
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2018 11:51 am
- Location: Q19 Southern Stand MCG
Yep. But before the penalty was announced, and they said that he'd placed multi-bets on 3 Collingwood games, I thought 'sh*t, they're going to throw the book at him'. But 22 weeks is over the top considering the bets totalled $36, and he self-reportedDamien wrote:Looking at all the other precedents the penalty seems way OTT.
I find your lack of faith disturbing
- Raw Hammer
- Posts: 7353
- Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:54 pm
- Location: The Gutter
- Has liked: 1 time
- Been liked: 4 times
Words came from Jordan De Goey after his mistake in 2018
“I need to regain the trust of my team mates”
Any time a player commits off field indiscretion he not only jeopardise himself but the guy’s around him working and trying to toe the line for team success
He is no different than any player in any club in that respect
“I need to regain the trust of my team mates”
Any time a player commits off field indiscretion he not only jeopardise himself but the guy’s around him working and trying to toe the line for team success
He is no different than any player in any club in that respect
I'm not arguing--just explaining why i am right
This is a massive massive penalty but if it’s 3 bets then it adds up.
Plain stupid on his behalf.
My question is; will the AFL integrity unit look at the betting sponsorships as a double standard and sending a terrible message?
Plain stupid on his behalf.
My question is; will the AFL integrity unit look at the betting sponsorships as a double standard and sending a terrible message?
The match day thread is for unfiltered BS knee jerk reactions. The time for level headed comment comes after.
- PyreneesPie
- Posts: 4592
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2014 1:49 pm
- Has liked: 66 times
- tbaker
- Posts: 1211
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2018 11:51 am
- Location: Q19 Southern Stand MCG
I was optimistic after that leak - that it would be 10 weeks, reduced to about 4 - suffice to say I was gobsmacked when I heard the 22.inxs88 wrote:Typical AFL leak (to Jake Niall). Can't this organisation keep their friggin mouths shut till the presser? More leaks than a sieve.
I find your lack of faith disturbing
- Damien
- Posts: 5718
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 1999 8:01 pm
- Location: Croydon Vic
- Has liked: 3 times
- Been liked: 11 times
No chance. Too much money involved. It’s no different to jockeys betting on races.Haff wrote:This is a massive massive penalty but if it’s 3 bets then it adds up.
Plain stupid on his behalf.
My question is; will the AFL integrity unit look at the betting sponsorships as a double standard and sending a terrible message?
'Collingwood are the Bradmans of Football'
The Herald - 1930
The Herald - 1930