US election 2020
Moderator: bbmods
- stui magpie
- Posts: 54844
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
- Location: In flagrante delicto
- Has liked: 132 times
- Been liked: 168 times
Interesting commentary on the whole Caucus system, sounds like a dogs breakfast
https://edition.cnn.com/2020/02/04/poli ... index.html
https://edition.cnn.com/2020/02/04/poli ... index.html
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
-
- Posts: 8764
- Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 12:04 pm
Rundown:
>Iowa caucus begins
>results start coming in very slowly
>turns out results were not actually coming in, lots of reports that something is wrong and it shouldn't be taking so long
>suddenly reports that there is some weird new app that the Dems are using for the caucus
>suddenly it isn't working properly
>reports say if the screen on the phone shuts off, the entire app resets
>the app was also reporting counts wrong, to the wrong districts, to the wrong people
>turn out Pete Buttigieg funded this app partially
>the DNC pulls the plug, removes all results, says it will take time to tally the votes
>Biden, Warren, and Bernie all make speeches saying that they expect good results
>Pete Buttigieg comes straight out and says that he actually won the caucus
>digging into the app more reveals that it was created by Hillary staffers from 2016
>Bernie campaign dropped their internal numbers, which is only 40% of the vote
>put this out without the DNC consent, which means if there is discrepancies between reported and his report, there will be MASSIVE seething
Posted from 4chan, edited for the sensibilities of Nick's
>Iowa caucus begins
>results start coming in very slowly
>turns out results were not actually coming in, lots of reports that something is wrong and it shouldn't be taking so long
>suddenly reports that there is some weird new app that the Dems are using for the caucus
>suddenly it isn't working properly
>reports say if the screen on the phone shuts off, the entire app resets
>the app was also reporting counts wrong, to the wrong districts, to the wrong people
>turn out Pete Buttigieg funded this app partially
>the DNC pulls the plug, removes all results, says it will take time to tally the votes
>Biden, Warren, and Bernie all make speeches saying that they expect good results
>Pete Buttigieg comes straight out and says that he actually won the caucus
>digging into the app more reveals that it was created by Hillary staffers from 2016
>Bernie campaign dropped their internal numbers, which is only 40% of the vote
>put this out without the DNC consent, which means if there is discrepancies between reported and his report, there will be MASSIVE seething
Posted from 4chan, edited for the sensibilities of Nick's
- think positive
- Posts: 40243
- Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:33 pm
- Location: somewhere
- Has liked: 342 times
- Been liked: 105 times
- David
- Posts: 50685
- Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 4:04 pm
- Location: the edge of the deep green sea
- Has liked: 17 times
- Been liked: 83 times
I wouldn’t put it past them to try, but my rule is never opt for conspiracy theories when human incompetence is plausible. The fact that former Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook (i.e. one of the A-grade bunglers we can thank for getting Trump into the White House) was in charge of testing it is just all too fitting. These guys couldn’t organise a piss-up in a brewery let alone a stitch-up of a caucus.Wokko wrote:It's smelling like a fix already, but then we all knew it was coming.
"Every time we witness an injustice and do not act, we train our character to be passive in its presence." – Julian Assange
- stui magpie
- Posts: 54844
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
- Location: In flagrante delicto
- Has liked: 132 times
- Been liked: 168 times
Trump's state of the union speech got some mixed reviews but generally appears to have aced it.
Watching The Project tonight, their US correspondent said it was the opening speech of the next election and take out 3 or 3 small bits it could've been delivered by Bernie Sanders. I nearly choked.
Pelosi sat there for the whole thing with an expression on her face like her arse was sucking a lemon, then made a big show of tearing up her printed version as soon as it was finished and making sure the media knew. All class.
Watching The Project tonight, their US correspondent said it was the opening speech of the next election and take out 3 or 3 small bits it could've been delivered by Bernie Sanders. I nearly choked.
Pelosi sat there for the whole thing with an expression on her face like her arse was sucking a lemon, then made a big show of tearing up her printed version as soon as it was finished and making sure the media knew. All class.
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
-
- Posts: 16634
- Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 10:41 pm
- Has liked: 14 times
- Been liked: 28 times
^Nothing too embarrassing along with the efforts to turn national damage and decline into greatness?
In the end the rain comes down, washes clean the streets of a blue sky town.
Help Nick's: http://www.magpies.net/nick/bb/fundraising.htm
Help Nick's: http://www.magpies.net/nick/bb/fundraising.htm
- Jezza
- Posts: 29545
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:28 pm
- Location: Ponsford End
- Has liked: 271 times
- Been liked: 356 times
Latest Results (Iowa) - 96% counted:
Initial Alignment:
- Bernie Sanders (24.4%) = 41,628
- Pete Buttigieg (21.4%) = 36,929
- Elizabeth Warren (18.7%) = 31,894
- Joe Biden (14.9%) = 25,391
- Amy Klobuchar (12.7%) = 21,773
- Andrew Yang (5.1%) = 8,628
- Tom Steyer (1.8%) = 2,990
- Uncommitted (0.6%) = 951
- Tulsi Gabbard (0.2%) = 326
- Michael Bloomberg (0.1%) = 213
- Other (0.1%) = 158
- Michael Bennet (0.1%) = 145
- Deval Patrick (0.0%) = 49
- John Delaney (0.0%) = 9
Final Alignment:
- Bernie Sanders (26.2%) = 43,674
- Pete Buttigieg (25.3%) = 42,175
- Elizabeth Warren (20.5%) = 34,220
- Joe Biden (13.6%) = 22,759
- Amy Klobuchar (12.2%) = 20,398
- Andrew Yang (1.0%) = 1,739
- Uncommitted (0.8%) = 1,402
- Tom Steyer (0.2%) = 401
- Other (0.1%) = 204
- Michael Bloomberg (0.0%) = 20
- Tulsi Gabbard (0.0%) = 15
- Michael Bennet (0.0%) = 1
State Delegate Equivalents:
- Pete Buttigieg = 549 (26.4%)
- Bernie Sanders = 533 (25.7%)
- Elizabeth Warren = 380 (18.3%)
- Joe Biden = 328 (15.8%)
- Amy Klobacher = 254 (12.2%)
- Andrew Yang = 21 (1.0%)
- Tom Steyer = 7 (0.3%)
- Uncommitted = 4 (0.2%)
- Other = 1 (0.0%)
National Pledged Delegates:
- Pete Buttigieg = 11
- Bernie Sanders = 11
- Elizabeth Warren = 5
(27 of 41)
Initial Alignment:
- Bernie Sanders (24.4%) = 41,628
- Pete Buttigieg (21.4%) = 36,929
- Elizabeth Warren (18.7%) = 31,894
- Joe Biden (14.9%) = 25,391
- Amy Klobuchar (12.7%) = 21,773
- Andrew Yang (5.1%) = 8,628
- Tom Steyer (1.8%) = 2,990
- Uncommitted (0.6%) = 951
- Tulsi Gabbard (0.2%) = 326
- Michael Bloomberg (0.1%) = 213
- Other (0.1%) = 158
- Michael Bennet (0.1%) = 145
- Deval Patrick (0.0%) = 49
- John Delaney (0.0%) = 9
Final Alignment:
- Bernie Sanders (26.2%) = 43,674
- Pete Buttigieg (25.3%) = 42,175
- Elizabeth Warren (20.5%) = 34,220
- Joe Biden (13.6%) = 22,759
- Amy Klobuchar (12.2%) = 20,398
- Andrew Yang (1.0%) = 1,739
- Uncommitted (0.8%) = 1,402
- Tom Steyer (0.2%) = 401
- Other (0.1%) = 204
- Michael Bloomberg (0.0%) = 20
- Tulsi Gabbard (0.0%) = 15
- Michael Bennet (0.0%) = 1
State Delegate Equivalents:
- Pete Buttigieg = 549 (26.4%)
- Bernie Sanders = 533 (25.7%)
- Elizabeth Warren = 380 (18.3%)
- Joe Biden = 328 (15.8%)
- Amy Klobacher = 254 (12.2%)
- Andrew Yang = 21 (1.0%)
- Tom Steyer = 7 (0.3%)
- Uncommitted = 4 (0.2%)
- Other = 1 (0.0%)
National Pledged Delegates:
- Pete Buttigieg = 11
- Bernie Sanders = 11
- Elizabeth Warren = 5
(27 of 41)
| 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 |
- David
- Posts: 50685
- Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 4:04 pm
- Location: the edge of the deep green sea
- Has liked: 17 times
- Been liked: 83 times
Last edited by David on Thu Feb 06, 2020 4:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Every time we witness an injustice and do not act, we train our character to be passive in its presence." – Julian Assange