Top 4 predictions (betting thread)
Moderator: bbmods
-
- Posts: 148
- Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 8:15 pm
-
- Posts: 148
- Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 8:15 pm
Thats what my old Man said, but the same trifecta with Grundy is at 201-1Skids wrote:Great price for a good chance there BKF!
I honestly think Grundy will be top 3 though, which will pop you there.
Looking forward to this count more than I have the last 10 years... don't know why.
The Artist Formerly known as...
"With a couple of exceptions, I hadn’t been in touch with most of those punters for over a decade. ... Despite my doubts, though, most did reply. I sent 15 emails and, over three weeks, 11 came back with answers. Two further emails were returned asking why I was bothering them after all this time and requesting that I don’t again. Two of my emails await a response and, I suspect, will wait indefinitely."
https://www.betfair.com.au/hub/the-advi ... e-punters/
Why bother replying an email just to be rude?
https://www.betfair.com.au/hub/the-advi ... e-punters/
Why bother replying an email just to be rude?
Sportsbet ordered to pay winnings on 'unfairly cancelled' AFL bets
https://www.theage.com.au/business/comp ... 536bt.html
"The decision does not say how much punters are owed and Sportsbet would not say. However industry sources suggested it ranged from "a few million" up to $9 million.
...
In deciding whether or not Sportsbets' odds were "obvious errors", the NTRC said it considered whether they would have been discernible to the average customer with "a reasonable knowledge of betting and of the sport of AFL".
Based on the fact that four of the nine prices Sportsbet offered were higher than prices previously offer for the same bet, "it is arguable that it would not be outrageous to see the prices offered in error on offer"."
Err... what does that last sentence mean?
https://www.theage.com.au/business/comp ... 536bt.html
"The decision does not say how much punters are owed and Sportsbet would not say. However industry sources suggested it ranged from "a few million" up to $9 million.
...
In deciding whether or not Sportsbets' odds were "obvious errors", the NTRC said it considered whether they would have been discernible to the average customer with "a reasonable knowledge of betting and of the sport of AFL".
Based on the fact that four of the nine prices Sportsbet offered were higher than prices previously offer for the same bet, "it is arguable that it would not be outrageous to see the prices offered in error on offer"."
Err... what does that last sentence mean?
- David
- Posts: 50683
- Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 4:04 pm
- Location: the edge of the deep green sea
- Has liked: 17 times
- Been liked: 83 times
Sounds good! Honestly, I'd have Port and Brisbane a little higher based on what we've seen so far this season, and maybe GWS once they start getting players back. But we're a strong top 4 chance for sure and deserve to be in conversation as a premiership chance.
On the other hand, Richmond look cooked and hopefully will stay that way.
On the other hand, Richmond look cooked and hopefully will stay that way.
"Every time we witness an injustice and do not act, we train our character to be passive in its presence." – Julian Assange