^That sample makes sense, and the list of concerns looks legitimate enough. The conference also bills itself as international in scope, so that encompasses a whole range of much nastier mining-related activities than we see locally (my mind is taken to a documentary I once watched on the horror lives of sulphur mining workers in Indonesia).
Skids wrote:pietillidie wrote:Skids wrote:
They've no idea. ALL mining is destructive, it's what it's all about. You dig up the good stuff!
Sure, the miners put out the token enviros , and, believe me, that's all they are.
No mining? What will we make solar panels out of? Lettuce leaves?
Absolutely clueless fools with nothing to contribute to society, oxygen thieves.
Children's pythons, red-bellied black snakes and death adders are ALL snakes, but if you have to be bitten there is a clear order of preference.
You're making the same error as the people you're calling clueless fools and oxygen thieves.
I can see no merit in your comparison.
Please, do tell, what mining isn't destructive...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environme ... _of_mining
Unlike the clowns protesting, I've seen many mine sites first hand.
The comparison concerns the all-or-nothing lack of nuance you both share. You replied to fools wanting to ban
all mining - let's assume for a moment the story was true - with the equally vacuous declaration that
all mining is destructive. The fact you're having trouble seeing just how vacuous that statement is speaks for itself.
How many mining-related civil wars, land dispossessions, poisoned villages, or terrorist/autocrat-funding revenue streams have you been involved in, first hand? Even ignoring these (which is impossible given their prevalence and the international reach of capital and MNCs), do you hold that better and worse mining techniques, site management approaches, moral economies and laws don't and can't exist? That if we look at the history of mining or mining in distant lands we won't see a range of possibilities? Do you hold that better alternatives cannot be designed or legislated in any context? Would you happily work on any and all mining sites, or engage in any and all mining activities on the basis that, in any case, 'all mining is destructive'?
Your experience makes your glibness even worse; rather than using your knowledge to guide these 'clowns' towards a more sophisticated discussion of the topic, you instead tried to outdo them with an air-headed Donald Trump tweet. Don't get me wrong; I do think you're knowledgeable and insightful, you're just choosing not to be constructive.