Page 4 of 4
Posted: Fri Sep 17, 2004 4:35 pm
by Johnson#26
There was a topic on Sports Today on 3AW yesterday where Carlton supporters could ring up and say weather they wanted Whitnall or not. Even the Blues supporters want to get rid of him - and sugeested he would be good at Sydney. I agree with that, as their game style would suit big Lance.
Posted: Sat Sep 18, 2004 12:50 am
by Ben From Bentleigh
The only place FATNELL is suited to is the front counter at Macca's
Posted: Sat Sep 18, 2004 10:22 am
by erniedog
Witnall may not be worth a McGough but maybe a Mullins+Williams ie unwanted for unwanted.
He may not fit in with our long range plans, but if we can get him cheaply enough + show that he can still play, we may be able to get a good trade for him in a year or two.
Posted: Sat Sep 18, 2004 3:35 pm
by Johnson#26
No way. It would be stupid to go for him.
Posted: Sun Sep 19, 2004 11:29 am
by spoljar
I would throw up if Fat farm came to Collingwood. What the hell could he possibly bring to Collingwood? How to eat 10 Big Mac's before a game. I would rather keep McGough!
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2004 12:10 pm
by Joel
I heard Balem talking on SEN the other day, on Friday I think, and he wasn't very commital abotu keeping McGough. He pretty much said that if McGough finds a club that he wants to go to, and can work something out, then the Pies woud oblige, and let him go. But he said, if something can't be done, then he will stay. He also said that they'd prefer to keep him, but the tone of his voice wasnt exactly sincere.
Balme also had a whinge about the Internet, or web culture something, cos he reckons its too easy for people to have a go at people etc, these days.
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2004 12:13 pm
by Cam
That is true about the web culture. We overanalyse to the nth degree.