SEN 3pm News: Pies make big play for Joel Smith

Daks · Post by **Daks** » Thu Oct 07, 2004 4:28 pm

3rd degree wrote:Why Not pick 52 and Dr Alf Andrews for Joel Smith? - Dunstall would be stoked.

Haven't we already delisted Alf?.

Joel · Post by **Joel** » Thu Oct 07, 2004 4:28 pm

Dermie is in - will let you know what he says when they ask him.

Pa Marmo · Post by **Pa Marmo** » Thu Oct 07, 2004 4:31 pm

Joel what is the link for sen

Streak · Post by **Streak** » Thu Oct 07, 2004 4:31 pm

Da suspense is moidah!

swoop · Post by **swoop** » Thu Oct 07, 2004 4:31 pm

I would trade pick 7 for J. Smith. He is what we need, a pacey hbf with excellelent disposal skills.

Joel · Post by **Joel** » Thu Oct 07, 2004 4:32 pm

nuxta wrote:Joel what is the link for sen

http://www.sen.com.au/pages/listen.html

Joel · Post by **Joel** » Thu Oct 07, 2004 4:33 pm

Btw, they have avoided asking him so far, because they are interviewing some bloke.

Glenn Robbins I think, who knows why.

Pa Marmo · Post by **Pa Marmo** » Thu Oct 07, 2004 4:35 pm

thanks mate

Streak · Post by **Streak** » Thu Oct 07, 2004 4:36 pm

Bah, he'll probably be all cagey and shit, and refuse to say anything.

Pity there's no Footy Show tonight, though - it would have been a cracker.

blackandwhite4life · Post by **blackandwhite4life** » Thu Oct 07, 2004 4:37 pm

If we trade either pick 7 or Lonie for Smith we are f**kin insane.

O'Bree, McG or pick 23; some combination of no more than 2 of these. Can't see why the Hawks wouldn't take either player as they are going to need some good honest midfielders. We simply have too many of this type.

Smith adds a lot more to our overall team than either of these 2 but I don't think he's worth a "lucrative" contract.

Johnson#26 · Post by **Johnson#26** » Thu Oct 07, 2004 4:38 pm

I wouldn't do it. We have players exactly the same as him (Johnson and Cole). Why stunt their growth? If we were to get him, it would have to be O'Bree + Shaw/McGough. No more then that. He gets many of his kicks short across the backline. He is not needed. Is there any news on the deal?

Joel · Post by **Joel** » Thu Oct 07, 2004 4:38 pm

If he refuses to say anything, I think that means something.

Post by **BBHS** » Thu Oct 07, 2004 4:39 pm

bloody kath and kim bullshit

3rd degree · Post by **3rd degree** » Thu Oct 07, 2004 4:39 pm

Daks wrote:
3rd degree wrote:Why Not pick 52 and Dr Alf Andrews for Joel Smith? - Dunstall would be stoked.
Haven't we already delisted Alf?.

No but we almost lost him to Port!

Joel · Post by **Joel** » Thu Oct 07, 2004 4:40 pm

Johnson#26 wrote:I wouldn't do it. We have players exactly the same as him (Johnson and Cole). Why stunt their growth? If we were to get him, it would have to be O'Bree + Shaw/McGough. No more then that. He gets many of his kicks short across the backline. He is not needed. Is there any news on the deal?

He would add plenty to our side. A fair bit anyway. Allows us to be a bit more flexible.

Like I said, I wouldn't do it for Pick 7, but if we can get him, we might as well.

Getting him wouldn't stunt the growth of Cole and Johnson, it would allow them to take on a more midfield oriented role.

This is an unofficial Bulletin Board - owned and run by its users. We welcome all fans of the Mighty Collingwood Football Club.

SEN 3pm News: Pies make big play for Joel Smith