Page 4 of 10
Posted: Thu Oct 07, 2004 4:28 pm
by Daks
3rd degree wrote:Why Not pick 52 and Dr Alf Andrews for Joel Smith? - Dunstall would be stoked.
Haven't we already delisted Alf?.
Posted: Thu Oct 07, 2004 4:28 pm
by Joel
Dermie is in - will let you know what he says when they ask him.
Posted: Thu Oct 07, 2004 4:31 pm
by Pa Marmo
Joel what is the link for sen
Posted: Thu Oct 07, 2004 4:31 pm
by Streak
Da suspense is moidah!
Posted: Thu Oct 07, 2004 4:31 pm
by swoop
I would trade pick 7 for J. Smith. He is what we need, a pacey hbf with excellelent disposal skills.
Posted: Thu Oct 07, 2004 4:32 pm
by Joel
nuxta wrote:Joel what is the link for sen
http://www.sen.com.au/pages/listen.html
Posted: Thu Oct 07, 2004 4:33 pm
by Joel
Btw, they have avoided asking him so far, because they are interviewing some bloke.
Glenn Robbins I think, who knows why.
Posted: Thu Oct 07, 2004 4:35 pm
by Pa Marmo
thanks mate
Posted: Thu Oct 07, 2004 4:36 pm
by Streak
Bah, he'll probably be all cagey and shit, and refuse to say anything.
Pity there's no Footy Show tonight, though - it would have been a cracker.
Posted: Thu Oct 07, 2004 4:37 pm
by blackandwhite4life
If we trade either pick 7 or Lonie for Smith we are f**kin insane.
O'Bree, McG or pick 23; some combination of no more than 2 of these. Can't see why the Hawks wouldn't take either player as they are going to need some good honest midfielders. We simply have too many of this type.
Smith adds a lot more to our overall team than either of these 2 but I don't think he's worth a "lucrative" contract.
Posted: Thu Oct 07, 2004 4:38 pm
by Johnson#26
I wouldn't do it. We have players exactly the same as him (Johnson and Cole). Why stunt their growth? If we were to get him, it would have to be O'Bree + Shaw/McGough. No more then that. He gets many of his kicks short across the backline. He is not needed. Is there any news on the deal?
Posted: Thu Oct 07, 2004 4:38 pm
by Joel
If he refuses to say anything, I think that means something.
Posted: Thu Oct 07, 2004 4:39 pm
by BBHS
bloody kath and kim bullshit
Posted: Thu Oct 07, 2004 4:39 pm
by 3rd degree
Daks wrote:3rd degree wrote:Why Not pick 52 and Dr Alf Andrews for Joel Smith? - Dunstall would be stoked.
Haven't we already delisted Alf?.
No but we almost lost him to Port!
Posted: Thu Oct 07, 2004 4:40 pm
by Joel
Johnson#26 wrote:I wouldn't do it. We have players exactly the same as him (Johnson and Cole). Why stunt their growth? If we were to get him, it would have to be O'Bree + Shaw/McGough. No more then that. He gets many of his kicks short across the backline. He is not needed. Is there any news on the deal?
He would add plenty to our side. A fair bit anyway. Allows us to be a bit more flexible.
Like I said, I wouldn't do it for Pick 7, but if we can get him, we might as well.
Getting him wouldn't stunt the growth of Cole and Johnson, it would allow them to take on a more midfield oriented role.