Page 4 of 7
Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2004 7:06 pm
by piedys
Walker would WANT to step up. He owes us BIG time.
Dyso
Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2004 8:05 pm
by spoljar
Every time I hear a report about Clemo at the moment it seems to be different!!! I've heard everything to he's OK to he'll be out for two months. What I want to know is do they really know the extent of the damage yet and if so how long is it really going to be?!?!?!?
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2004 7:27 am
by Culprit
He visits a specialist today and he will be lost for 8 weeks in a worse case scenario.
who to step up? We may see a forward thrown down the back in my Opinion.
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2004 7:59 am
by JLC
Well we dont have many forwards to start off with so i cant see one being thrown down back. The only candidate out of the forwards may be Andrew Williams. His confidence may be down but he is a good mark for his size.
You would hope one of the younger players would step up though ie Lonie and help fill the void.
jlc
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2004 8:02 am
by Culprit
We can throw Ant down there and make him CHB, robbing Peter to pay Paul, but we may have no choice. Naturally after round 1.
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2004 9:43 am
by Joel
I can't see that happening Culprit, that would decimate our forward line, and leave minimal options down forward (with Ant anyway).
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2004 10:34 am
by Culprit
Malthouse will revert to the old plan, keep the opposition to one goal as long as you kick two you win. I see we will have no choice.
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2004 11:56 am
by themonk
JC out is a huge blow, our backline against Richmond may be -
johnson presti nixon
lonie wakelin cole
*with j.cloke floating, walker is also an option
Our main area of concern will be our underdone midfield & no rocca at CHF
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:03 pm
by Culprit
Nixon? Your kidding right? He struggled in practice games.
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2004 4:04 pm
by Johnson#26
themonk wrote:JC out is a huge blow, our backline against Richmond may be -
johnson presti nixon
lonie wakelin cole
*with j.cloke floating, walker is also an option
Our main area of concern will be our underdone midfield & no rocca at CHF
Thats a pretty solid backline but I wouldn't be willing to throw Nixon down there in the 1st match. Maybe R.Shaw could have a chance for redemption?
Bo
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2004 4:33 pm
by themonk
You both may be right, it may be a big ask for Nixon to play down back in his first game, however I will not be suprised if Bo makes his Collingwood debut in round 1. His preseason form has been stronger than that of King/Shakleton/B.Shaw & MM is hinting that several youngsters may play against the Tigers.
Scared? I know I am.
Posted: Thu Mar 18, 2004 12:40 am
by CQ
yes themonk, i am too! injuries, arrrgh, this means those duds who got totally caned against WCE wil be comin back into the 1's noooooo, we have no depth, its shit. and if they prove me wrong, well good on em, but until then WELLLLLL!
Posted: Thu Mar 18, 2004 11:30 am
by Joel
CQ, they aren't duds. How would you go in your first day on the job? Give them a break.
Posted: Sat Mar 20, 2004 8:58 am
by Culprit
The word I have from a good source is James will be lucky if he plays in 2004. His eye was virtually ripped out in the accident. He was lucky all the nerve endings stayed intact.
Huge blow I am devestated after hearing that.
Posted: Sat Mar 20, 2004 10:10 am
by Johnson#26
Culprit wrote:The word I have from a good source is James will be lucky if he plays in 2004. His eye was virtually ripped out in the accident. He was lucky all the nerve endings stayed intact.
Huge blow I am devestated after hearing that.
Where did you get that from?!