Page 4 of 5

Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2014 11:20 am
by qldmagpie67
This may seem a stupid question to many but what power does the AFL have to push or facilitate any trade deal between clubs if there is an impass ?

Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2014 11:24 am
by Raw Hammer
qldmagpie67 wrote:This may seem a stupid question to many but what power does the AFL have to push or facilitate any trade deal between clubs if there is an impass ?
Zero.

Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2014 11:25 am
by John Wren
^ i wouldn't have thought any official power but no doubt a quiet word in someone's ears might do the trick.

Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2014 11:29 am
by jdpie1970
qldmagpie67 wrote:This may seem a stupid question to many but what power does the AFL have to push or facilitate any trade deal between clubs if there is an impass ?
There is no process in place that allows the AFL to be an intermediary in trade negotiations (unless of course you are a Northern State club :wink: ).

Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2014 1:15 pm
by neil
Rich is a T Rex

Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2014 1:18 pm
by qldmagpie67
Raw Hammer wrote:
qldmagpie67 wrote:This may seem a stupid question to many but what power does the AFL have to push or facilitate any trade deal between clubs if there is an impass ?
Zero.
Cheers mate my reason for asking was knowing the AFL they screw ove the pies at every turn so was concerned they would again in this

Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2014 1:44 pm
by Woods Of Ypres
neil wrote:Rich is a T Rex
lol true.

Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2014 3:06 am
by E
Deja Vu wrote:If we can get Greenwood out of North I'd settle for 2 picks in the top 15 for Beams
i agree with this so long as one of them is a top 5 pick.

Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2014 6:29 am
by Albert Parker
neil wrote:Rich is a T Rex
Kind of thought he was more carnival/circus folk

Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2014 9:29 am
by MJ23
Pick 5 and either Rich or Redden I'd be happy with.

Would have Redden just ahead as he is taller and plays bigger - we have Adams that can play the rich role.

Still wouldn't knock either back

Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2014 11:55 am
by inxs88
If we could have a midfield roatation that included:

1. Pendlebury
2. Swan
3. Adams
4. Greenwood
5. Sidebottom
6. J Thomas
7. Broomhead
8. Freeman
9. J Redden
10. J Laverde (pick 5)

It would give us a nice combination of inside and outside players

Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2014 12:13 pm
by regan is true fullback
the idea of a trade is a win win. much as I would like to scroue Brisbane pointless, it is better to compromise, otherwise you end up like the smart alecs of the league, with simmering resentment from the other party.

we have been scrude in the past over the Brett Stevens non trade, and the poaching of Philip Walsh. it is better to get what you can rather than hold out for too much.

pick 23 is on the table now. in the words of two of the three Dr Whos:

"Take it, Omega!"

Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2014 12:50 pm
by inxs88
Brett Stephens from 1987! Wowee that's a good memory!

Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2014 1:10 pm
by regan is true fullback
it was Nick Stevens from 2004 (technically 03, but 04 was a definite year of Merde, like this one)

Fair go, do you realise how many Stevenses there were at the time, at North at least?

Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2014 2:10 pm
by inxs88
Michael Stevens, Anthony Stevens!!