Page 4 of 6
Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2014 6:56 pm
by John Wren
Doc63 wrote:Damien wrote:Just a word of warning people: this story was started by Damian Barrett, who raised it with Plough on trade radio so of course there could be Jack schitt in it
So, it was started by an Ambulance Chaser, and a dud coach. That pretty much puts this one to bed.
i like wallace and what he says holds greater credence than the ambulance chaser.
Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2014 8:38 pm
by OEP
The possibility of GWS being interested in Dayne is great, means I can make another ridiculous trade proposal that results in the Pies getting picks and Cameron McCarthy
Sooooooooooooooo,
We send Dayne and pick 30 to GWS for Cameron McCarthy, picks 4 and 21.
We send Harry, picks 4 and 48 to Melbourne for picks 2 and 23.
We then use pick 23 to obtain Levi from the Kangas.
We lose Dayne, Harry, picks 30 and 48.
We gain Levi, McCarthy, picks 2 and 21.
We use pick 2 on either Petracca or Brayshaw, pick 8 on Darcy, and pick 21 on Clem Smith.
Happy days
.
Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2014 11:14 pm
by inxs88
Hey Barrett aint no muppet! He is a PURPLE muppet
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2014 6:54 pm
by Jameoz23
Joel wrote:I'd do this:
Pick 5 + Patfull to GWS
Treloar to COLL + Pick 25 to Coll (from GWS)
Beams to BRIS
This is the most fair trade for all 3 clubs. The lions and the Giants get the players and picks they want, and we get a player that will be a great midfielder going forward. Considering we have put years of time into Beams, Treloar will be at that standard in a year or two, if we want to get something worth while out of this trade season we need to make a trade like this.
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2014 9:40 pm
by Domesticated_Ape
What about Dylan Shiel? I read somewhere that he might want to come back to Victoria. He and Treloar are the two best GWS midfielders apart from Josh Kelly IMO. I'd be more than happy to ontrade pick 5 for any of these guys, though the Giants would be silly to do it.
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2014 7:38 pm
by Stupied
Beams to Brisbane
Griffin to GWS
Treloar + 21 (Lions)to Pies
Pick 4(GWS) + pick 5 (Lions) to Dogs
Sounds fair?
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2014 7:52 pm
by Captain_MyCaptain
Stupied wrote:Beams to Brisbane
Griffin to GWS
Treloar + 21 (Lions)to Pies
Pick 4(GWS) + pick 5 (Lions) to Dogs
Sounds fair?
Nope.
Beams > Griffin.
Treloar + 5 to Pies.
4 plus 21 to Dogs.
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2014 8:00 pm
by Breadcrawl
Stupied wrote:Beams to Brisbane
Griffin to GWS
Treloar + 21 (Lions)to Pies
Pick 4(GWS) + pick 5 (Lions) to Dogs
Sounds fair?
Dogs third rounder to Pies and you gotta deal.
But Treloar is going nowhere. End of story. He is very much a required player
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2014 8:02 pm
by swoop42
Stupied wrote:Beams to Brisbane
Griffin to GWS
Treloar + 21 (Lions)to Pies
Pick 4(GWS) + pick 5 (Lions) to Dogs
Sounds fair?
Great for the dogs but not as much for us or especially GWS
Beams to Brisbane.
Griffin + Patful +25 (Lions) to GWS. (they keep 21 for Patful and 7 for Jaksch)
Treloar + 6 (dogs) to Pies.
Pick 4 (GWS) + Pick 5 (Lions) + 30 (Pies) to Dogs.
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2014 8:02 pm
by MJ23
Captain_MyCaptain wrote:Stupied wrote:Beams to Brisbane
Griffin to GWS
Treloar + 21 (Lions)to Pies
Pick 4(GWS) + pick 5 (Lions) to Dogs
Sounds fair?
Nope.
Beams > Griffin.
Treloar + 5 to Pies.
4 plus 21 to Dogs.
Nope Treloar = Beams right now.
Treloar is younger and in our side would be our second best player.
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2014 8:05 pm
by MJ23
Breadcrawl wrote:Stupied wrote:Beams to Brisbane
Griffin to GWS
Treloar + 21 (Lions)to Pies
Pick 4(GWS) + pick 5 (Lions) to Dogs
Sounds fair?
Dogs third rounder to Pies and you gotta deal.
But Treloar is going nowhere. End of story. He is very much a required player
Really depends on what GWS knows of his intent next year.
If they think they have a year of speculation and dragged out efforts to get him to stay , as it stands he is worth it.
IF though they get Griffith and Beams it would make the loss bearable this year and keep the members reasonably happy.
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2014 8:05 pm
by CarringbushCigar
unders for the dogs swoop
we don't need more than treloar for beams
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2014 8:08 pm
by MJ23
^ keep saying it.
I watch a lot of Treloar live.
He is worth a straight swap.
Look forward to revisiting these comments in a few years - will take one, two at most
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2014 8:15 pm
by swoop42
No way do the dogs get to keep pick 6 and receive 4 and 5 for Griffin.
Stuff that for a joke.
GWS have clearly stated that Treloar wont be traded so it's all moot anyway.
Looking at his stats he seems very similar to Beams though not as big a goal kicker at this stage.
Like Beams there is a bit of an unbalance when it comes to rebound 50's compared to inside 50's.
I dare say like Beams he works harder forward of the ball than behind it.
What price goals though?
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2014 8:43 pm
by John Wren
MJ23 wrote:^ keep saying it.
I watch a lot of Treloar live.
He is worth a straight swap.
Look forward to revisiting these comments in a few years - will take one, two at most
in a few years treloar will be one of the comp's best. would so love to see him in black and white.