Page 4 of 20
Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:08 am
by MJ23
Was at the game
Certainly see a lot more than what you see on TV.
He worked tirelessly in a "lead up" role
He lead, doubled back. lead again, doubled back and lead up again.
We have a habit of not honoring a lead.
He was being held at every stoppage and worked through it by providing a block for sidey and at times Broomhead.
He may very well of had to however he played 93% game time., Thats a player who has missed a great deal of training and pre-season this year.
He is working into his fitness base for AFL footy and on the weekends work ethic - injuries aside - I have no doubt he will be back to his best next year and push up onto the wing or midfield.
Im not worried about Fas and where he is at.
Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 11:47 am
by roar
What'sinaname wrote:I think we have better small running backmen.
Which of those backmen is a decent kick?
Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 11:54 am
by John Wren
roar wrote:What'sinaname wrote:I think we have better small running backmen.
Which of those backmen is a decent kick?
sinclair.
Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 11:56 am
by die4pies
Like all the players on both our VFL and AFL lists he pulls on a Collingwood jumper and busts both his nuts to honour it and it's proud tradition. Love him and the lot of them to a fault.
I'm a supporter, that's what I do.
Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 1:17 pm
by Geek
He's been playing in the back half to round out his game because Buckley sees a midfield role for him in the future. Buckley said as much earlier this year.
Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 1:42 pm
by Skids
35forever wrote:It continues to amaze me how many Collingwood supporters don't understand the mental/psychological side of the game. Fas, along with H, and Swanny are players who thrived under MM, and have found the game harder under Buckley. I think its mutual too, those guys aren't the kind of player Bucks has a lot of time for. He doesn't like people who are 'different'.
Surely you jest?
Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 1:47 pm
by John Wren
Skids wrote:35forever wrote:It continues to amaze me how many Collingwood supporters don't understand the mental/psychological side of the game. Fas, along with H, and Swanny are players who thrived under MM, and have found the game harder under Buckley. I think its mutual too, those guys aren't the kind of player Bucks has a lot of time for. He doesn't like people who are 'different'.
Surely you jest?
he must. no other logical conclusion can be made of that statement above.
Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 1:48 pm
by inxs88
fasolo just doesn't win enough 50/50 ball and as such shall struggle in modern footy. Think:
* Josh Hill
* C Young
* Shane Woewodin
* J Garlett
* Jessie White
If he had an ounce of Puopolo or a tad Gavin Brown competitive urge with a dose of Jake King, well........
Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 1:53 pm
by die4pies
Skids wrote:35forever wrote:It continues to amaze me how many Collingwood supporters don't understand the mental/psychological side of the game. Fas, along with H, and Swanny are players who thrived under MM, and have found the game harder under Buckley. I think its mutual too, those guys aren't the kind of player Bucks has a lot of time for. He doesn't like people who are 'different'.
Surely you jest?
Please don't call him Shirley
Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 2:12 pm
by Rexy17
Has one last game to show he has something to offer. Was poor Saturday nite when the side was crying out for someone to stand up and be counted. Plenty off his type on the list and most likely a few more will be added in this years draft. Time to move him on, which will be best for both him and the club......IMO
Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 2:27 pm
by roar
John Wren wrote:roar wrote:What'sinaname wrote:I think we have better small running backmen.
Which of those backmen is a decent kick?
sinclair.
I think our definition of decent varies. Perhaps I should of written "good" kick. Sinclair is more or less the same level as Tooves, Williams or Frost, IMO. Maybe not terrible but too many turnovers to be considered a good user of the football.
Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 2:32 pm
by Breadcrawl
roar wrote:What'sinaname wrote:I think we have better small running backmen.
Which of those backmen is a decent kick?
Armstrong
Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 2:33 pm
by roar
Yeah, Armstrong is ok but I prefer Fas.
Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 2:37 pm
by John Wren
roar wrote:John Wren wrote:roar wrote:
Which of those backmen is a decent kick?
sinclair.
I think our definition of decent varies. Perhaps I should of written "good" kick. Sinclair is more or less the same level as Tooves, Williams or Frost, IMO. Maybe not terrible but too many turnovers to be considered a good user of the football.
his kicking has improved markedly on what we had all been accustomed to. since his return i think he is better than being a good kick. watch him closely this week. hopefully he will not let me down.
Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 2:54 pm
by jackcass
swoop42 wrote:die4pies wrote:Funny (no not really) way to SUPPORT your team and players.
Recruitment/Coach wannabees and their endless self-important misguided mumblings will be the death of me.
So we didn't trade Heath Shaw last season or Chris Dawes the year before?
Strange how the coach doesn't have a problem with off loading premiership players if it thinks it's in the best interest of the club going forward.
So I take you don't feel he's supporting the team?
This a discussion board, where people are free to raise tough questions and explore possibilities the club may choose to take at seasons end.
Whether it be Fasolo or someone else of relative quality you've got to give something to get something of value in return.
The coach seems to understand this, do some of you?
Agree. Aren't too many untouchables in our squad and don't doubt the coaching and list management bods will make the tough decisions for the betterment of the club. Not sure Fasolo is any risk of being off loaded but if the right offer comes along....