Recreational cyclists
Moderator: bbmods
- stui magpie
- Posts: 54828
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
- Location: In flagrante delicto
- Has liked: 126 times
- Been liked: 160 times
Sorry, I disagree.watt price tully wrote:See above, not even 10% correct.think positive wrote:hehe, yep, 100%Pies4shaw wrote:The entire structure of our built environment is predicated upon massive, powerful, fast objects driving on roads.
Consequently, getting on a bicycle and riding on a road is a very risky act. It's like swimming in the dark in shark-infested waters. Most of us are not stupid enough to do it.
The road system here was originally designed to accommodate firstly horse and bullock born carriages. If Chumly Wentworth the third got too close to the horses or bullocks on his penny farthing he would have got the whip across his arse.
Then cars and trucks came along and the divide was made between the road and the footpath. One for vehicles and one for feet.
Then cyclists came along and buggered everything up by claiming the right to ride on the road
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
-
- Posts: 20842
- Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 1:14 pm
1. The road system was made how many years ago assumes nothing has changed since the time roads have been built.
1.2 Plenty has changed: roads have changed, cars have changed, rules have changed, road users have changed: indeed their are lanes
2. P4S wrote that "the entire structure is predicated" clearly that's wrong (see above)
3. P4S wrote that it's like swimming in shark infested waters. Clearly that's overreach and wrong. It's like swimming in the sea where sharks exist but people who bicycle aren't riding in infested waters; there will be a shark attack now and again. If I go swimming where I know sharks exist and are known to feed (no accommodation for people who ride bikes & no road education either) is a lot different to riding where bike lanes do exist (regular beach going) and most cars most of the time are aware (and are policed)
4. I will never ride on a freeway or say the Ring Road in Melbourne. I do ride on Beach Road and StKilda road: yo need to be aware and mindful as I do crossing the road, driving my car etc.
5. Citing examples of bike riders being killed or injured does not mean shark infested waters - you may as well say pedestrians killed by cars also means using roads can be dangerous.
6. Riding a bike on roads in many ways has never been safer but pick your roads, ride with others as much as possible and not just be seen but be noticed: bright colours, reflective jackets & lights: I see too many riders wear black ec. Always obey the road rules as too many cars don't.
1.2 Plenty has changed: roads have changed, cars have changed, rules have changed, road users have changed: indeed their are lanes
2. P4S wrote that "the entire structure is predicated" clearly that's wrong (see above)
3. P4S wrote that it's like swimming in shark infested waters. Clearly that's overreach and wrong. It's like swimming in the sea where sharks exist but people who bicycle aren't riding in infested waters; there will be a shark attack now and again. If I go swimming where I know sharks exist and are known to feed (no accommodation for people who ride bikes & no road education either) is a lot different to riding where bike lanes do exist (regular beach going) and most cars most of the time are aware (and are policed)
4. I will never ride on a freeway or say the Ring Road in Melbourne. I do ride on Beach Road and StKilda road: yo need to be aware and mindful as I do crossing the road, driving my car etc.
5. Citing examples of bike riders being killed or injured does not mean shark infested waters - you may as well say pedestrians killed by cars also means using roads can be dangerous.
6. Riding a bike on roads in many ways has never been safer but pick your roads, ride with others as much as possible and not just be seen but be noticed: bright colours, reflective jackets & lights: I see too many riders wear black ec. Always obey the road rules as too many cars don't.
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
-
- Posts: 20842
- Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 1:14 pm
Fatal accident: elderly pedestrian crosses a red light
https://www.theage.com.au/national/vict ... 5213t.html
https://www.theage.com.au/national/vict ... 5213t.html
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
- stui magpie
- Posts: 54828
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
- Location: In flagrante delicto
- Has liked: 126 times
- Been liked: 160 times
Unless the old guy literally stepped right in front of the cyclist, how the hell did he not manage to avoid him?
Yeah most cycles have shit brakes, but if he was watching where was going and had a second or 2 to react, you'd think he could avoid wiping out an old man even if he had to drop.
Yeah most cycles have shit brakes, but if he was watching where was going and had a second or 2 to react, you'd think he could avoid wiping out an old man even if he had to drop.
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
- think positive
- Posts: 40237
- Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:33 pm
- Location: somewhere
- Has liked: 337 times
- Been liked: 103 times
- stui magpie
- Posts: 54828
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
- Location: In flagrante delicto
- Has liked: 126 times
- Been liked: 160 times
Not implying negligence, even if he had his head down pedalling hard, he had right of way with the lights. I just have a mental disconnect with the idea that the old bloke just didn't see him which suggests he wasn't 5 metres away so deciding to cross against the lights, and the cyclist not having enough time to take some evasive action.
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
-
- Posts: 20842
- Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 1:14 pm
Same killing of cyclists by cars across the ditch
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/ ... ew-zealand
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/ ... ew-zealand
Last edited by watt price tully on Tue Feb 18, 2020 3:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
-
- Posts: 20842
- Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 1:14 pm
This is sad but rivetting. Well done to the local police in Queensland
Part one was last night, part two is next week:
Australian Story ABC (Monday nights at 8.pm or ABC iView)
https://iview.abc.net.au/show/australian-story
Part one was last night, part two is next week:
Australian Story ABC (Monday nights at 8.pm or ABC iView)
https://iview.abc.net.au/show/australian-story
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
- stui magpie
- Posts: 54828
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
- Location: In flagrante delicto
- Has liked: 126 times
- Been liked: 160 times
Yet cycling is statistically far safer in Victoria at least than driving, riding a motor cycle or even walking. http://www.tac.vic.gov.au/road-safety/s ... g-12-month
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
-
- Posts: 20842
- Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 1:14 pm
Did you text that while driving?stui magpie wrote:Yet cycling is statistically far safer in Victoria at least than driving, riding a motor cycle or even walking. http://www.tac.vic.gov.au/road-safety/s ... g-12-month
Seriously though Australian Story this week is well worth a watch.
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
- stui magpie
- Posts: 54828
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
- Location: In flagrante delicto
- Has liked: 126 times
- Been liked: 160 times
- stui magpie
- Posts: 54828
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
- Location: In flagrante delicto
- Has liked: 126 times
- Been liked: 160 times