Re: Lynch agree to 2 years?

melliot · Post by **melliot** » Fri Sep 28, 2012 5:06 pm

We play 3 talls forward line.

2010& 2011 Dawes, Brown, Cloke (Fraser/Keefe were the backups)

2013 could be Lynch, Dawes, Cloke. (Paine/Witts could be back up)

ClokingDevice · Post by **ClokingDevice** » Fri Sep 28, 2012 5:13 pm

What about Pedo and Martin? Is the Q-stick a better option than them?

woftam · Post by **woftam** » Fri Sep 28, 2012 5:27 pm

ClokingDevice wrote:What about Pedo and Martin? Is the Q-stick a better option than them?

Not better than Martin if you ask me. Would it be rude of me if I let out a cheer if the scum get Lynch instead of us?

AN_Inkling · Post by **AN_Inkling** » Fri Sep 28, 2012 7:37 pm

Lynch would be a decent option, but not the preferred, mostly because of his age and the fact he's more of a forward than a ruck.

Ideally we'd want a player who can play forward and play some first ruck when needed. Otherwise we'll need another mature ruck on our list, whether Wood or someone else.

Trezegol · Post by **Trezegol** » Fri Sep 28, 2012 7:45 pm

Lynch is a much better forward than Martin. Martin is a No.1 Ruckman, with the possibility of pinch hitting as a forward.

Honestly, I reckon we have a 2nd ruckman already. Lachie Keefe. The guy played in the midfield as a soccer player, which means he has plenty of mobility. He certainly still lacks strength, but he could be another midfielder if played in the ruck.

AN_Inkling · Post by **AN_Inkling** » Fri Sep 28, 2012 7:49 pm

Keeffe's an option, but he's coming off a knee reco. Doubt he'll play in the ruck straight away.

AN_Inkling · Post by **AN_Inkling** » Fri Sep 28, 2012 7:51 pm

I'd be happy enough to have Lynch if his body could hold up for two years. The signs are good, because he's been durable over his career. There is the risk though that he'd not be able to give us much even for one year.

Up to the club to assess him and decide how much he can offer us.

CAAS · Post by **CAAS** » Fri Sep 28, 2012 9:00 pm

bugger Lynch, go for Martin.

Big T · Post by **Big T** » Fri Sep 28, 2012 9:05 pm

We are targeting a premiership next year and need a bulldozer. Lynch is needed.

piedys · Post by **piedys** » Fri Sep 28, 2012 10:13 pm

Big T wrote:We are targeting a premiership next year and need a bulldozer. Lynch is needed.

So what we are saying is that Dawes cannot fill that role, as he is a BobCat at best?!

Dyso

Big T · Post by **Big T** » Sat Sep 29, 2012 6:47 am

piedys wrote:
Big T wrote:We are targeting a premiership next year and need a bulldozer. Lynch is needed.
So what we are saying is that Dawes cannot fill that role, as he is a BobCat at best?!

Dyso

I think when we are in the situation where Dawes is our only option and we have to play him on one leg in a prelim, then we are for sure lacking another option. Maybe getting Lynch will bring the best out of Dawes.

selkevh · Post by **selkevh** » Sat Sep 29, 2012 11:28 am

According to Channel 7

obleex · Post by **obleex** » Sat Sep 29, 2012 11:28 am

Richo just said that it was a done deal on channel 7...

burnsy17 · Post by **burnsy17** » Sat Sep 29, 2012 11:29 am

Signs?

With whom.....?

selkevh · Post by **selkevh** » Sat Sep 29, 2012 11:31 am

Pies apparently.

Sorry if posted already in trade news?? Which it is

This is an unofficial Bulletin Board - owned and run by its users. We welcome all fans of the Mighty Collingwood Football Club.

Re: Lynch agree to 2 years?

Lynch Signs