Page 5 of 9
Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2014 2:40 pm
by The Prototype
David wrote:So, hang on, was that it? Or was there another incident? Please tell me there was, because if that's what he was sacked over...
Well that woman was supposedly getting messages and such back in August, and it ended in November, so I guess there was that one and the recent one on Snapchat. I have no idea what 'Kik' is but apparently he met the 23 year old on there and was messaging her and wanting sex.
In the past he also told the Blues he was too sick to play but was posting pictures of him on the beach on instragram so it seems there was form there and the latest one was the one that helped get him sacked.
Now if the girl was underaged as the rumours around Facebook suggest and her parents dobbed her in that's fair enough, I would assume he was sacked not because of one issue but all of them.
Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2014 2:45 pm
by David
Granted on all the other stuff, but this was the trigger. After all the other incidents, he might have been rapped over the knuckles severely and he might have been skating on very thin ice, but he was still employed. The problem for me is that it was this that was the tipping point.
Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2014 2:48 pm
by The Prototype
I have to wonder if this was just an excuse for them to terminate him early, as they were going to do so at seasons end anyway. It didnt seem at all likely he was ever going to play again at the club, and seemed a weird bit of timing that after all the bad behaviour this was the final straw.
I guess when he "breaks his silence" we'll hear more of this bizarre story.
Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2014 3:46 pm
by Culprit
At the moment on one with half the team out injured we will take him. We just won't pay for his phone apps.
Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2014 4:08 pm
by swoop42
David wrote:Granted on all the other stuff, but this was the trigger. After all the other incidents, he might have been rapped over the knuckles severely and he might have been skating on very thin ice, but he was still employed. The problem for me is that it was this that was the tipping point.
So is this 23 year old the same female being identified as a teenager just days ago or is this a different incident altogether?
Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2014 5:12 pm
by 1061
Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2014 5:45 pm
by stui magpie
David, you're so focused on saying that things that are, shouldn't be.
I strongly suggest you don't take the same stance with the law of gravity. It may not end well.
Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2014 6:06 pm
by King Monkey
Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2014 6:22 pm
by stui magpie
Goddamn KM, No wonder your wife can't tell us apart, we really do think the same.
Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2014 6:35 pm
by partypie
Scuse me, but shouldn't he be sacked on the basis of bad taste?
Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2014 6:37 pm
by King Monkey
stui magpie wrote:Goddamn KM, No wonder your wife can't tell us apart, we really do think the same.
You can av her...........
Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2014 6:45 pm
by stui magpie
Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2014 7:34 pm
by David
Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2014 8:23 pm
by stui magpie
I'm 6'3" and a bit. i only look like 6'8" to munchkins
There's a Nancy Sinatra song that could be very easily corrupted in several ways to suit this situation.
Bring it on, someone.
Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2014 8:24 pm
by 1061