Should the Tavern be a 'closed' forum

Nick's current affairs & general discussion about anything that's not sport.
Voice your opinion on stories of interest to all at Nick's.

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply

Should the Tavern be a clised forum?

Yes
3
14%
No
19
86%
 
Total votes: 22

K
Posts: 21557
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2011 1:23 pm
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 32 times

Post by K »

Another example, where such patient-confidentiality concerns are probably not relevant, is Kirby. A long time ago (months), a poster on this board stated with seeming certainty that it was all over in terms of football. Fairfax at the time noted only that it was believed the club knew what the condition was, though they chose not to specify it. The claim is that the club had made the decision, but for the player's and club's sakes did not want to announce it. A week or two ago, this claim did appear in the media (of course it could have surfaced earlier and not been noticed by me), and I'm guessing it's likely correct.

There are also happier examples than this...
User avatar
stui magpie
Posts: 54842
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
Location: In flagrante delicto
Has liked: 132 times
Been liked: 167 times

Post by stui magpie »

I really don't get what your agenda is here.

This thread was specifically about the Tavern, not general discussion.

Making GD a closed page where you had to log in to read anything would be ridiculous. If people couldn't read anything without joining, why would they even come here or join?

As far as people posting made up shit or private information and media or others picking it up, so what? Media types regularly trawl this and other fan sites (Big Footy in particular) as well as facebook group pages.

If you really think it's a good idea, post it in general feedback and see what the mods say.
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
K
Posts: 21557
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2011 1:23 pm
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 32 times

Post by K »

I don't have an agenda. If I (or others) come to some sort of conclusion and am certain that some sort of policy regarding any forum is a great idea, I (or others) presumably then have a reason to make concrete suggestions in the Feedback Forum. Would you prefer me to remain mute until such time?

No one actually suggested making GD closed. Even if they did, I don't think that's a reason not to remain calm or to object to any discussion. Discussion is usually considered okay.

The claim that media types trawl these bulletin boards, if true, actually gives greater reason to have discussions about these sorts of issues.
Last edited by K on Mon Jul 30, 2018 2:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
HAL
Posts: 45105
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2003 2:10 pm
Been liked: 3 times
Contact:

Post by HAL »

I am not so sure if I would like to prefer him or her to remain mute until such time.
User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34885
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 135 times
Been liked: 182 times

Post by Pies4shaw »

K
Posts: 21557
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2011 1:23 pm
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 32 times

Post by K »

^ Well, more concretely, a VPTer's boss could come on here, knowing before or after that the employee is a VPTer and, on the basis of what the boss reads, the employee could be sacked.

Such things have certainly happened in the past. (e.g. in the US, a photo of someone giving the finger to a political entourage went viral and the woman was sacked.)
User avatar
luvdids
Posts: 3963
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2008 1:56 am
Location: work

Post by luvdids »

:roll:

Pretty sure my boss doesn't know me as 'luvdids'. If he does, good luck to the loser, I've always considered him a moron & has no idea how to run the company. :lol: :lol: :lol:
Post Reply