#12 Matt Scharenberg

Player President threads here thanks.

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
User avatar
Dave The Man
Posts: 44968
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:04 pm
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
Been liked: 5 times
Contact:

Post by Dave The Man »

Matt needs to watch this Video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BGCotaZPHVM
I am Da Man
qldmagpie67
Posts: 6007
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 10:41 pm
Been liked: 78 times

Post by qldmagpie67 »

Well if he's gone he's gone the deal is easy really
Scharenberg to the Crows
Dangerfield, Sloane, Walker, Betts & Jacobs to the pies plus Crows first rd picks for next 4yrs
Get it done Eddie
:D
User avatar
Didaksgoal
Posts: 3289
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 9:03 pm

Post by Didaksgoal »

qldmagpie67 wrote:Well if he's gone he's gone the deal is easy really
Scharenberg to the Crows
Dangerfield, Sloane, Walker, Betts & Jacobs to the pies plus Crows first rd picks for next 4yrs
Get it done Eddie
:D
Sounds fair. I can't see anything wrong with that! :D We'll give them Scott Burns as coach as the tickler in the deal.

Go the Pies!
User avatar
swoop42
Posts: 22046
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 9:27 pm
Location: The 18
Been liked: 3 times

Post by swoop42 »

AN_Inkling wrote:
swoop42 wrote:It might come back to bite me on the arse but it's time to stop sitting on the fence.

He's gone in my opinion.

I've always had my suspicions once he started talking about putting off contract talks till the end of the year as it's a common story we've seen time and again from players who inevitably end up leaving.

In Scharenbergs case it's even more peculiar given his injury history with most players in similar circumstances being just content to be re-signed.
So where's Freeman going then? Exactly the same situation.

I don't know if he's going or staying and don't see the fascination in being the first to call him gone (Rudeboy seems to like going very hard and early on this :D). When the news is out (no not tonight's non-news) I'll think about it, until then he's a Collingwood player.
Not the same situation at all.

Freeman is Victorian.

He wasn't hyped pre draft as the best schoolboy footballer since Carey.

Scharenberg has a younger brother coming through the ranks at the elite junior level. If he leaves clubs outside of Adelaide would be reluctant to draft his younger brother as well.

Freeman hasn't been subjected to media attention regarding his contract status and hasn't responded by saying he'll put contract talks on hold till the end of the year.

Importantly unlike Scharenberg it hasn't been reported Collingwood has been trying to re-sign Freeman with him unwilling to do so.

I guess it's just assumed by all he will.
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD!
User avatar
Bruce Gonsalves
Posts: 842
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 3:17 pm
Been liked: 2 times

Post by Bruce Gonsalves »

After 35 pages, I'm not going through previous posts, but, is it possible or even a fair deal that Shazza to Adelade, Danger to Geelong and Motlop to the Pies?
watt price tully
Posts: 20842
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 1:14 pm

Post by watt price tully »

Bruce Gonsalves wrote:After 35 pages, I'm not going through previous posts, but, is it possible or even a fair deal that Shazza to Adelade, Danger to Geelong and Motlop to the Pies?
Sold.

I'm a "True Believer"
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
User avatar
swoop42
Posts: 22046
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 9:27 pm
Location: The 18
Been liked: 3 times

Post by swoop42 »

Fair for us.

Not for Adelaide.

Okay for Geelong.


Dangerfield>Motlop>Scharenberg

Scharenberg, Geelong 1st rounder to Adelaide.

Dangerfield, Collingwood 3rd rounder to Geelong.

Motlop to Collingwood.
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD!
User avatar
Bruce Gonsalves
Posts: 842
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 3:17 pm
Been liked: 2 times

Post by Bruce Gonsalves »

Danger can go anywhere I believe for sfa, so it's never going to be fair for Adelaide.
User avatar
John Wren
Posts: 24186
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:28 pm

Post by John Wren »

no he can't. rfa. adelaide have every right to match or exceed the offer.
Purveyor of sanctimonious twaddle.
User avatar
Pebbles Rocks
Posts: 1241
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: Collingwood

Post by Pebbles Rocks »

swoop42 wrote:Fair for us.

Not for Adelaide.

Okay for Geelong.


Dangerfield>Motlop>Scharenberg

Scharenberg, Geelong 1st rounder to Adelaide.

Dangerfield, Collingwood 3rd rounder to Geelong.

Motlop to Collingwood.
Dangerfield is a free agent. Cats don't have to trade for him
"You must be a parking ticket, cuz you got fine written all over you" Glen Quagmire
User avatar
Dave The Man
Posts: 44968
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:04 pm
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
Been liked: 5 times
Contact:

Post by Dave The Man »

Dangerfield will not be part of the Schranberg Possible Trade
I am Da Man
User avatar
RudeBoy
Posts: 22076
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 1:08 pm
Been liked: 74 times

Post by RudeBoy »

Pebbles Rocks wrote:
swoop42 wrote:Fair for us.

Not for Adelaide.

Okay for Geelong.


Dangerfield>Motlop>Scharenberg

Scharenberg, Geelong 1st rounder to Adelaide.

Dangerfield, Collingwood 3rd rounder to Geelong.

Motlop to Collingwood.
Dangerfield is a free agent. Cats don't have to trade for him
Dangerfield is not a free agent, he's a limited free agent or something like that.
User avatar
Pebbles Rocks
Posts: 1241
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: Collingwood

Post by Pebbles Rocks »

RudeBoy wrote:
Pebbles Rocks wrote:
swoop42 wrote:Fair for us.

Not for Adelaide.

Okay for Geelong.


Dangerfield>Motlop>Scharenberg

Scharenberg, Geelong 1st rounder to Adelaide.

Dangerfield, Collingwood 3rd rounder to Geelong.

Motlop to Collingwood.
Dangerfield is a free agent. Cats don't have to trade for him
Dangerfield is not a free agent, he's a limited free agent or something like that.
That only means Adelaide can match the $$$ offered. I am still right.
"You must be a parking ticket, cuz you got fine written all over you" Glen Quagmire
User avatar
mosig
Posts: 361
Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 3:53 pm

Post by mosig »

36 pages in it is 100% clear to me that he might go but there is also a possibility that he will stay. Potentially involving trades and or draft picks.
User avatar
swoop42
Posts: 22046
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 9:27 pm
Location: The 18
Been liked: 3 times

Post by swoop42 »

Pebbles Rocks wrote:
RudeBoy wrote:
Pebbles Rocks wrote: Dangerfield is a free agent. Cats don't have to trade for him
Dangerfield is not a free agent, he's a limited free agent or something like that.
That only means Adelaide can match the $$$ offered. I am still right.
Geelong will have to trade for Dangerfield if Adelaide force there hand and match any offer.

Could happen, may not.
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD!
Post Reply