Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board

Thanks for telling me that gossip. I will remember it.

Piesnchess wrote:I heard today the wells deal is done and dusted, all done.

Who gets him? Is it us?

think positive wrote:

Piesnchess wrote:I heard today the wells deal is done and dusted, all done.

Who gets him? Is it us?

Yep, according to my impeccable source it us.

stui magpie wrote:

Cam wrote:AndrewT = credible source

Since the poor fella's twitter account has been suspended, I guess we get the pleasure of his company until he figures a way to get around the ISP block at Big Footy.

I edited my post, apparently he is a credible source.

AndrewT wrote:I'm the source.. You will soon see anyway <snip, cut out the name calling - bbmods>. Don't question my loyalty. I just know what's happened at the club. You just guess so shut up and listen buddy and you might learn something

Well Talk to people like that and You lose a Bloody Lot of Respect

Cam wrote:

stui magpie wrote:

Cam wrote:AndrewT = credible source

Since the poor fella's twitter account has been suspended, I guess we get the pleasure of his company until he figures a way to get around the ISP block at Big Footy.

I edited my post, apparently he is a credible source.

Huh ? really ?

AndrewT may be a credible source, but he is not talking to everyone at the club. My view is his opinions are being formed by the person or persons giving him the information, which he is assuming is gospel and representative of every person at the club's view.
He seems to think Buckley got rid of anyone with personality. What he isn't taking into account is what were these players with personality were doing in house. If it is anything like I saw on the field, which was playing like big heads, then that may be your answer.

AndrewT wrote:I'm the source.. You will soon see anyway Don't question my loyalty. I just know what's happened at the club. You just guess so shut up and listen buddy and you might learn something

"I'm the source"

This is genius.

Redlight wrote: "I'm the source"

This is genius.

I think he meant he was on the sauce.


Seems a lot are trying to suggest Wells is done and dusted and a Pie, would be interesting anyway.

mooretreloar wrote:AndrewT may be a credible source, but he is not talking to everyone at the club. My view is his opinions are being formed by the person or persons giving him the information, which he is assuming is gospel and representative of every person at the club's view.
He seems to think Buckley got rid of anyone with personality. What he isn't taking into account is what were these players with personality were doing in house. If it is anything like I saw on the field, which was playing like big heads, then that may be your answer.

If the players were not committed they would not have performed as they did in the last few rounds. I saw Collingwood in 1976 and that is what happens when a team and club is divided. I cant imagine why anyone sensible like Cam would call AndrewT a credible source ...?

Cam wrote:

stui magpie wrote:

Cam wrote:AndrewT = credible source

Since the poor fella's twitter account has been suspended, I guess we get the pleasure of his company until he figures a way to get around the ISP block at Big Footy.

I edited my post, apparently he is a credible source.

Credible. Like Donald Trump.

I agree. As I posted earlier this week, at 4-8 at the bye if the team weren't happy with Buckley, then they would have put the cue in the rack and we would have ended up 4-18. It was exactly the opposite, we beat finalists in GWS and WCE, lost by a point to another finalist in Hawthorn and by 3 points to another finalist in the Dogs. Also, competitive against Adelaide. So, rubbish to say they aren't playing for Bucks.

AndrewT is a bit rough and edgy, but is worth listening to.

Mooretreloar is much more refined and polished, and is also worth listening to.

Mugwump wrote:

mooretreloar wrote:AndrewT may be a credible source, but he is not talking to everyone at the club. My view is his opinions are being formed by the person or persons giving him the information, which he is assuming is gospel and representative of every person at the club's view.
He seems to think Buckley got rid of anyone with personality. What he isn't taking into account is what were these players with personality were doing in house. If it is anything like I saw on the field, which was playing like big heads, then that may be your answer.

If the players were not committed they would not have performed as they did in the last few rounds. I saw Collingwood in 1976 and that is what happens when a team and club is divided. I cant imagine why anyone sensible like Cam would call AndrewT a credible source ...?

Tongue firmly implanted in cheek I think. All the scuttlebutt suggests Wells to Collingwood so it's not that great a claim to suggest it's a done deal. Hardly makes anyone either creditable or a genius.

Cam wrote:AndrewT is a bit rough and edgy, but is worth listening to.

Mooretreloar is much more refined and polished, and is also worth listening to.

I give AndrewT (and any previous incarnation) zero credibility.

AndrewT could work at the club, be an ex-player or current administrator for all I care. Having inside info doesn't make the representation of that info honest, reasonable or indicative of the truth.

The world is full of the bitter and the disgruntled.

If one claims inside knowledge, then the onus is on that person to present their credentials so that their credibility can be evaluated.

That, or zip it.

"I'm the source" What a ripper.