Post Match. Pies down to Giants. All comments.

Match previews, reviews, reports and discussion.

Moderator: bbmods

Locked
lazzadesilva
Posts: 2206
Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2003 7:01 pm
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 51 times

Post by lazzadesilva »

swoop42 wrote:I feel like I've come pretty attuned when watching us to know when we're totally switched on, having a red-hot crack and when we're simply off and our intensity is not what it needs to be.
If that’s the case, I worry about them not bringing their A game into their first game. They treated it like a practice game. I know they won’t win every game in a long season and it was not the loss per say that worries me, it’s that I desperately hope it’s not a malaise that’s going to last a while. If we lose to Sydney this Friday, I will start getting a tad worried
I term the current Collingwood attack based strategy “Unceasing Waves” like on a stormy and windy day with rough seas. A Perfect Storm ☔️
User avatar
Take_a_Screamer
Posts: 1965
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2018 8:51 pm
Location: Melbourne S.E.Suburbs
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 11 times
Contact:

Post by Take_a_Screamer »

Ash Johnson...you beauty
Johnson Screamer @ https://www.afl.com.au/video/931485/joh ... -epic-mark? ❤️️
piffdog
Posts: 1334
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2021 10:55 am
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 33 times

Post by piffdog »

^ the laziest thing I saw on the coverage was Lyon’s commentary…
It's never as good/nor bad as it seems...
matrix10
Posts: 833
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 6:42 pm

Post by matrix10 »

piffdog wrote:^ the laziest thing I saw on the coverage was Lyon’s commentary…
Bravo!
Commentators loving sinking the boot in to us- we make them $$$
We played poorly and lost- despite having more scoring shots
Mirror imagine of Brisbane game last year up there- a few crucial outs- inability to convert our early dominance and bad goal kicking (and they’re goal kicking was unbelievable)

I rate GWS as the best team in it- phenomenal list- strong, skilled and very well coached

We have a hard first month but if we can be at least 50/50 by midway through the year- have no doubt we will come home strong and be ready to have. Crack at back to back
K
Posts: 21445
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2011 1:23 pm
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 17 times

Post by K »

masoncox wrote:Is it me or did Schultz look over weight?
He does look fat.

It's strange, 'cos I didn't think he looked fat in Freo colours. Don't black and white vertical stripes make you look thinner?

Ronnie McKeowns boots wrote:...
Giants Callum Brown was a sight...they are gonna be hard to stop if he has a big year. Who would have thought the giants would be 9 goals up against the reigning premiers with him not having kicked a goal?
"Him" meaning Toby, right?
User avatar
Piesnchess
Posts: 26159
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 4:24 pm
Has liked: 178 times
Been liked: 72 times

Post by Piesnchess »

shawthing wrote:
qldmagpie67 wrote:Watched the replay again (I’m guessing I like torture)
Mate I agree with everything you say. That's a brilliant analysis of how we lost this game. Yes GWS were very good, but we were also very poor in almost every facet of the game.

Now the true test of Fly's coaching comes to the fore. He's been cruising in the honeymoon for the past two years. He's a players' coach and after the Buckley era the playing group thrived on being given more freedom and responsibility. But now comes the real test. Will 2024 turn into our dreaded 1991? The question is wide open and if we lose to the red hot Swans and Grundy next week the alarm bells will be ringing.

In fact I can't see us beating the Swans at all next week. There are just too many holes to plug and our list is not as good as we thought it was. We won the flag on system alone (congrats to Fly it was his system). But now he has to find a way to get around the gaping weaknesses in our list (no KPFs for a start - GWS has how many? 3 or 4 if you include Toby Greene - OMG).


Jeezus, one loss and its all pessimism, bloody unreal. Mate that "not good enough list " won the bloody Premiership,or do you forget that, what an inane statement., GWS are a 4 goal better team up on their shithole ground, we lost by 5, and had more scoring shots, we were minus Howe and Murphy, that alone gave their big forwards a holiday. GWS were primed for revenge, their big mouth CEO said this himself, its one loss, thats it. No way will we lose to the Swannetees, red hot my arse, they beat a disunited team in Melbourne, racked by internal fighting,up at their tiny chardonnay ground. WE play then here, on OUR MCG, we will be in a filthy mood make n mistake about that. As Fly said, we unfurl our flag, then get down to hard work, real hard work. We wont lose this one, make a couple of changes, and be a very differnt team. We had least 9 players down on form last week, way out of sorts, including Pendles, that wont happen again, Woods by 20 points
Poverty exists not because we cannot feed the poor, but because we cannot satisfy the rich.

Chess and Vodka are born brothers. - Russian proverb.
piffdog
Posts: 1334
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2021 10:55 am
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 33 times

Post by piffdog »

Here's another take from the key guy at Champion Data. I know stats can be used to make a whole host of arguments, but this provides a different take on the performance.

https://www.sen.com.au/news/2024/03/12/ ... dispelled/

(spoiler: he's not too worried. Says we needed to kick straighter and that the rest of the game wasnt horrible). Not sure that matches what I saw with my eyes, but should provide a little more balance to some of the discussion on this thread.
It's never as good/nor bad as it seems...
User avatar
shawthing
Posts: 2861
Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2019 2:54 pm
Location: Victoria Park
Has liked: 5 times
Been liked: 56 times

Post by shawthing »

^We don't have a KPF. If we swapped our forward line with GWS we'd be on track to win four flags in a row. At best we have the 10th best forward line in the comp. Even last year we struggled to kick goals and had far too many games decided by a goal or two. Our backline will improve, but where are our goals coming from? That is down to poor recruiting. We should have thrown the kitchen sink at getting Lynch or Cameron a few seasons ago.

One more thing. We are still too short. The Giants really are giants!
piffdog
Posts: 1334
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2021 10:55 am
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 33 times

Post by piffdog »

^ We did throw the sink at Lynch. Cameron was never going to anyone but the Cats. We also haven’t had the cap space to go hard.

We have just snatched a flag - whatever the limitations on the squad are.
It's never as good/nor bad as it seems...
Pies2016
Posts: 6748
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2014 11:03 am
Has liked: 5 times
Been liked: 86 times

Post by Pies2016 »

How is it “ supporters “ still don’t understand we are bound by a salary cap. You can’t have it all ! If we had a million dollar forward like Charlie Curnow ( you know the one who doesn’t fire a shot during finals ) then we most likely don’t have DeGoey ( the one who single handedly beat the Giants in the prelim ) if we did still keep DeGoey and have Curnow in the team, then we couldn’t possibly afford Hill and / or Mitchell ( remember them, two of our best players in the G F )
If people are going to keep banging on about the reigning premiers not having any key forwards, that fine but at least stop and think about what we would’ve had to give up in order to secure the messiah.
Gary Player “ the harder I practice, the luckier I get “
User avatar
RudeBoy
Posts: 22074
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 1:08 pm
Been liked: 73 times

Post by RudeBoy »

piffdog wrote:Here's another take from the key guy at Champion Data. I know stats can be used to make a whole host of arguments, but this provides a different take on the performance.

https://www.sen.com.au/news/2024/03/12/ ... dispelled/

(spoiler: he's not too worried. Says we needed to kick straighter and that the rest of the game wasnt horrible). Not sure that matches what I saw with my eyes, but should provide a little more balance to some of the discussion on this thread.
Thanks piffdog. It's a great article.
Ronnie McKeowns boots
Posts: 2032
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2020 1:49 pm

Post by Ronnie McKeowns boots »

K wrote:
masoncox wrote:Is it me or did Schultz look over weight?
He does look fat.

It's strange, 'cos I didn't think he looked fat in Freo colours. Don't black and white vertical stripes make you look thinner?

Ronnie McKeowns boots wrote:...
Giants Callum Brown was a sight...they are gonna be hard to stop if he has a big year. Who would have thought the giants would be 9 goals up against the reigning premiers with him not having kicked a goal?
"Him" meaning Toby, right?
Yes, should have been clearer there...and he had kicked his goal by the time they were 9 goals up upon reflection....but I think the gist of the point remains valid
"You hate a mean man, a grasping man, a man who wants everything and gives nothing. That’s Collingwood. They are a law unto themselves"

Jack 'Captain Blood' Dyer
User avatar
MatthewBoydFanClub
Posts: 5557
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 6:02 pm
Location: Elwood
Been liked: 1 time

Post by MatthewBoydFanClub »

Pies2016 wrote:How is it “ supporters “ still don’t understand we are bound by a salary cap. You can’t have it all ! If we had a million dollar forward like Charlie Curnow ( you know the one who doesn’t fire a shot during finals ) then we most likely don’t have DeGoey ( the one who single handedly beat the Giants in the prelim ) if we did still keep DeGoey and have Curnow in the team, then we couldn’t possibly afford Hill and / or Mitchell ( remember them, two of our best players in the G F )
If people are going to keep banging on about the reigning premiers not having any key forwards, that fine but at least stop and think about what we would’ve had to give up in order to secure the messiah.
For years I've been going on about the need to draft young key position players. All our high draft picks have been on mids. One more year and we could have got Shultz for nothing under free agency. Instead we throw away high draft picks on seasoned players who help us out in the short term, but does nothing in the longer term. Fly is one of the great coaches who has done wonders in the two years we've had him, but he's not a genius. Elite sport is talent versus talent. Nick Daicos is an elite talent. Where is our elite talent in the forward line once you take out Bobby Hill and an aging Mihocek. A mid to late twenties Shultz who's another small forward to go with the others? Spare me. Ash Johnson has had enough chances. Our hopes now rest with McInnes, or with McStay returning early from his ACL.
K
Posts: 21445
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2011 1:23 pm
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 17 times

Post by K »

Pies2016 wrote:How is it “ supporters “ still don’t understand we are bound by a salary cap. You can’t have it all ! If we had a million dollar forward like Charlie Curnow ( you know the one who doesn’t fire a shot during finals ) then we most likely don’t have DeGoey ( the one who single handedly beat the Giants in the prelim ) if we did still keep DeGoey and have Curnow in the team, then we couldn’t possibly afford Hill and / or Mitchell ( remember them, two of our best players in the G F )
If people are going to keep banging on about the reigning premiers not having any key forwards, that fine but at least stop and think about what we would’ve had to give up in order to secure the messiah.
P16, I reckon folks are painfully aware of the salary cap...

We busted it on a greedy, dopey ruckman who can't mark or direct hit outs to teammates. Last year Buckley said that Eddie interfered with the footy department when they wanted to let that ruckman go. We are still paying him $300,000 a year to play for our next opponent.

BTW Sam Landsberger in today's Hun writes:

"Sydney is facing a salary cap squeeze, as it can be revealed ... Brodie Grundy will be paid close to $1.1 million this year...

... it can now be revealed the Swans must shell out about $700,0000-$750,000 this season for Grundy, with the Pies covering the final sum of about $300,000."
Locked