mal wants to play finals footy

CQ · Post by CQ » Tue Sep 12, 2000 11:46 am

well he's pissed off to brissy to play finals footy, f*ck maybe if he stayed at the pies he would, ha! wouldnt it be funny if we won a flag before brissy and see what he says then!

[This message has been edited by CQ (edited 11 September 2000).]

CQ · Post by CQ » Tue Sep 12, 2000 11:48 am

oh yeah and essendon want tyson lane. they might swap moorcroft, what does everyone else think?

magpie_russ · Post by **magpie_russ** » Tue Sep 12, 2000 12:09 pm

I'd take Moorcroft! He's a tough palyer and we need players like that.

[This message has been edited by magpie_russ (edited 11 September 2000).]

Joel · Post by **Joel** » Tue Sep 12, 2000 1:10 pm

Yeah, I'd take Moorcroft. And by the way I think we will win a flag before Brisbane.

mike b · Post by **mike b** » Tue Sep 12, 2000 3:22 pm

Stuff Moorcroft. Good player in a great team. I prefer Tyson Lane. I want to keep Mal too, especially now we have missed Gehrig - might have some spare money to pay him now. If he must go, swap him for Bradshaw, not fat boy Molloy.

jeff#2001 · Post by **jeff#2001** » Tue Sep 12, 2000 3:38 pm

gee so mal has gone another kick in the guts
i saw him at collingwood when he was a no-one
now he is a some one he walks out
i dont know why we bother !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Woodsman · Post by **Woodsman** » Tue Sep 12, 2000 3:41 pm

I would take Molloy and Moorcroft. We are a fairly skilled sidein our forward line and need some tough nuts down there.

Both Molloy and Moorcroft have a bit of mungrel and this will free up skilled players such as Tarrant, Leon Davis and co.

jeff#2001 · Post by **jeff#2001** » Tue Sep 12, 2000 3:44 pm

its not lookin good is it
we dont get gehrig,michael walks out
and we r getting 2 rejects wait for it
from FREMANTLE.

JLC · Post by **JLC** » Tue Sep 12, 2000 4:09 pm

Word Up

Personally i dont rate Moorcroft very highly. Lets face facts he gets the worst backman everytime he plays up forward for Essendon.I dont think he could handle the pressure of playing on better backman. We already have Leon Davis and Brad Oborne should be given time.

My deal would be our first draft pick and T.Lane for Scott Lucas. Essendon always want a draft pick in the top 10 of the draft. We need quality players at the club and Moorcroft is not quality. As for Mal Michael he said he followed his heart. That means he keeps his heart in his wallet..............

peace out

magpie_russ · Post by **magpie_russ** » Tue Sep 12, 2000 4:25 pm

Lucas, Tarrant and Molloy in the forward line. That doesn't sound so bad. Let's see what happens tomorrow.
"Paging Mr. Hamill you are wanted at the front desk!"

Joel · Post by **Joel** » Wed Sep 13, 2000 4:52 am

I'm still not sure about giving up pick 3. I rate Lucas highly but I'm not sure. I think in the end it would be a gamble that would pay off. IF Collingwood did decide on swapping the 3rd pick and say Tyson Lane then I would stick by their decision. Remember Lucas has already showed he potential (especially against us) and at pick number 3 we might get a kid that will not fulfil his potential. But thats the risk we take.

eye · Post by **eye** » Wed Sep 13, 2000 10:08 am

Why not trade pick three and tyson lane for Lucas, when we traded pick 3 and king for Mckee? Seems obvious to me.

CQ · Post by CQ » Wed Sep 13, 2000 10:14 am

i detect a bit of sarcasm there eye, though you are so right.....

magpie_russ · Post by **magpie_russ** » Wed Sep 13, 2000 12:38 pm

eye,
we swaped players and 1st round choices last year. we picked up Danny Roach with the No. 7( or

selection. so! they got king and 3 and we got mckee and 7.

This is an unofficial Bulletin Board - owned and run by its users. We welcome all fans of the Mighty Collingwood Football Club.

mal wants to play finals footy

mal wants to play finals footy