Page 1 of 1

Cox delisted by the Hawks.

Posted: Wed Sep 22, 2004 11:01 pm
by sq3
Adrian Cox has been delisted by the Hawks.

I would grab this guy ASAP as he is 24 and can play anywhere on the ground.

He is tough and would be a good pickup on skills alone.

Hawks must have blown a fuse.

Pies can capitalize on Hawks errors.

Picioane delisted as well ??????

Posted: Wed Sep 22, 2004 11:25 pm
by leonmagic
Cox is an absolute idiot - seriously I've got 2 mates at Box Hill Hawks and some of the things I've heard about him.... :?

Steer clear!!

Picioane..........maybe worth a PSD pick if he's still there.

Posted: Wed Sep 22, 2004 11:32 pm
by Dale61
Are you saying that the Hawks don't have Cox?

Posted: Wed Sep 22, 2004 11:48 pm
by leonmagic
Dale61 wrote:Are you saying that the Hawks don't have Cox?
:lol:

You mean you thought they did??

Posted: Wed Sep 22, 2004 11:56 pm
by Dale61
I knew they had no balls!

Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2004 12:02 am
by leonmagic
Dale61 wrote:I knew they had no balls!
Wrong!

Image


:lol: :lol:

Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2004 12:09 am
by Dale61
You're right, therefore, they have one ball and no cox!

Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2004 7:38 am
by Johnson#26
Cox is a shocker. Average kick, not accountable and his only asset is his pace. They should have got rid of him a long time ago. Don't touch him.

Piconie is worth it only as a PSD pick - even then, you'd have your doubts. Wasn't he taken at pick 12 by the Crows in the 1997 draft?

Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2004 8:02 am
by Nath
Hawthorn are in severe trouble, they've now lost to Cox in two years and they wonder why they couldn't keep the Chick.

Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2004 8:45 am
by Johnson#26
LOL Nath. :lol:

Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2004 9:10 am
by Daks
Johnson#26 wrote: Piconie is worth it only as a PSD pick - even then, you'd have your doubts. Wasn't he taken at pick 12 by the Crows in the 1997 draft?
Yeah, and he was a premiership player with them in 1998.

Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2004 9:57 am
by Cannibal
If we're trying to improve our list, in order to win a flag in 2006, how on earth would trading for a third-rate player from Hawthorn achieve this?

Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2004 11:15 am
by Cam
Bloody hell, Cox is stiff.

Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2004 11:46 am
by piedys
Cam wrote:Bloody hell, Cox is stiff.
But he doesn't have a Chick to play with anymore, and overlooked a Ball a cuppla years back! (as the other posters have ponited out).

Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2004 4:55 pm
by Johnson#26
Cannibal - spot on.

Daks - he played 4 games in 98, none in 99.