TARRANT FOR JUDD What does everyone think?

GO RUPERT 10 · Post by **GO RUPERT 10** » Sun Sep 26, 2004 4:47 pm

ive been having this argument with my boss at work
would you swap chris tarrant for chris judd?
just what an opinion

Magpie Since 1986 · Post by **Magpie Since 1986** » Sun Sep 26, 2004 4:56 pm

No. Only because good key position players are harder to get than midfielders. If it happened though I wouldnt be too upset.

Pa Marmo · Post by **Pa Marmo** » Sun Sep 26, 2004 5:18 pm

NOT IN A HEARTBEAT

Sultan of spin · Post by **Sultan of spin** » Sun Sep 26, 2004 5:51 pm

No, Tarrant is our most important player

GreekLunatic · Post by **GreekLunatic** » Sun Sep 26, 2004 6:01 pm

tarrant will stay a pie for sure but i read in the sun we could get rid of 12 players isnt that over doing it a little

Post by **Cam** » Sun Sep 26, 2004 7:52 pm

No. If you can cope without Buckley you can cope without Judd. Mighty hard to cope without Taz.

foxychick · Post by **foxychick** » Sun Sep 26, 2004 10:00 pm

I know I may get condemed for saying this but I would take Judd! i just find that Tarrant is inconsistent...I just dislike his attitude..if he had the heart to play football then i wouldn't give him up but it sometimes feels as if he doesn't wear his heart on his sleeve!! and his kick isn't the best either but the positive side is that he does provide an option and is a great mark.

but there is no use on having forwards if there is no midfield to bring the ball there! We have a lot of tall forwards coming through..i think finding a place for them all is going to be hard! BUt i know it's harder to find key position players than midfielders..but finding a classy midfielder who can break open a game is a different story.

Dale61 · Post by **Dale61** » Sun Sep 26, 2004 10:17 pm

Not another Tarrant for Judd thread. This is #1483 in the series.

Post by **Cam** » Sun Sep 26, 2004 10:19 pm

Our midfield got smashed last year, and kicked shit for Taz to try and mark. Remember 2003 when Taz kick 50+ goals and took the most marks in the AFL?

Post by **BBHS** » Sun Sep 26, 2004 10:55 pm

Cam wrote:Our midfield got smashed last year, and kicked shit for Taz to try and mark. Remember 2003 when Taz kick 50+ goals and took the most marks in the AFL?

Dont say that to loud because apparently he'd be better on a wing

sourav04 · Post by **sourav04** » Mon Sep 27, 2004 12:29 am

No. No No NO Absolutely not. I am not sure I can emphasize it enought Noooooooooooooo. I agree with what someone else posted on this topic. We have won games without Buckly, we have not won many games without Tarrant or Rocca. Both are Untoucahble. Judd playes for West Coast, and the reason why they are and will be continous finals losers is they have no forward line. 5 Judds will not help them.

sourav04 · Post by **sourav04** » Mon Sep 27, 2004 12:34 am

Just in case there is any doubt to my previous post. NO. I feel very strongly about this NO.

Johnson#26 · Post by **Johnson#26** » Mon Sep 27, 2004 9:23 am

No way. Keep Taz.

Brown26 · Post by **Brown26** » Mon Sep 27, 2004 10:55 pm

another for no - Taz is a gun, he's the best player of his type going round, bloody hard to match up on, works hard on the ground, marks well, leads well, still got a lot of years in him. We cna get another midfileder who is almost as good as Judd, we can't get another Tarrant, cause there isn't one.

- Ben

The Prototype · Post by **The Prototype** » Mon Sep 27, 2004 11:16 pm

No, as much as I would like Judd at Collingwood, Tarrant is more important.

This is an unofficial Bulletin Board - owned and run by its users. We welcome all fans of the Mighty Collingwood Football Club.

TARRANT FOR JUDD What does everyone think?

TARRANT FOR JUDD What does everyone think?