Page 1 of 1
Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2004 3:13 pm
by Nath
Mate..........
James Kelly wasn't mentioned, believe me he wasn't. The Geelong player mentioned is Monica Lewinsky.
Its along the Lines of
Essendon get Zantuck and Wojinski
Geelong get Brad Ottens
Richmond get Pick 12 (Essendons), Pick 14 and Pick 26
Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2004 3:16 pm
by BBHS
if thats the case richmond lost big time and this was already posted in another thread but like said above it was monica.
Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2004 3:20 pm
by blackandwhite4life
If this is right then Richmond have bent over and taken it from Sheedy big time.
Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2004 3:35 pm
by Cam
I don't want the scum to get Zantuck.
Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2004 3:41 pm
by scoobydoo
Y would geelong give kelly or bartel to ess for pick 12 when they can get pick 7 from the pies for the same players?
Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2004 3:59 pm
by Nath
Definately, what would I know....
Thompson clearly wants pick 12 for Bartel given that we'd give him 5 picks early, and moreover SEN never mentioned either of the players named (Kelly or Bartel)
Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2004 4:11 pm
by MardyP
Essendon have pick 14 not 12 - that belongs to West Coast.
And 26 belongs to the Kangaroos - Essendon have pick 30.
So it makes even LESS sense!
Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2004 4:40 pm
by Nath
Pick numbers are irrelevant, outside of pick 9, who gives a shit what pick you have.
That said, I also stated where the picks were coming from, so in one sense or another, the numbers aren't extremely important.
Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2004 4:45 pm
by Johnson#26
Zantuck isn't much. The Tigers (apart from Ottens) aren't losing much.
Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2004 4:49 pm
by Nath
If Andrew Welsh is mentioned in open trades, I'm all in for giving up Pick 7 and a player to get him, that kid is a mini Scott Burns.
Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2004 5:01 pm
by Johnson#26
Nope, I wouldn't do it just yet Nath. He has been consistant, but isn't really the player we need - particuarly at that price.