Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2004 8:36 pm
Yeah I haerd about it, would be handy with his pace.
Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board
This is an unofficial Bulletin Board - owned and run by its users. We welcome all fans of the Mighty Collingwood Football Club.
https://magpies.net/
Adkins?
Page 1 of 2
Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2004 8:51 pm
I like the sound of that!
Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2004 8:52 pm
SOLD!
Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2004 8:53 pm
afl.com.au is saying that pies want morrison in psd. i suspect the pies will wait and see what happens with ottens before committing to morrison.
they just might end up with the big fella in all this.....if it went to the wire the tiges might just have to take pick 7 for him.
then go and get a good uncontracted in the psd
they just might end up with the big fella in all this.....if it went to the wire the tiges might just have to take pick 7 for him.
then go and get a good uncontracted in the psd
Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2004 9:28 pm
adkins is a dud. seriously, he hasn't got the best disposal and you might as well keep shaw on the team because he'd have a better go at getting a game than adkins! adkins struggled to maintain a place in collingwood/wc just because he may seem better than williams when we traded him it doesn't mean he's better for the team
Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2004 9:36 pm
i wuld do that in a blink of an eye, doesnt anyone remember the promise he showed in 2001 with his pace which we severly lack, remember a match against doggies played liek a star that nite
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 10:05 am
Adkins has been a dud all year over here. He has had no impact in the WAFL whatsoever. He's put on some bulk and lost the pace that we all liked. His distribution of the ball rivals MCG's. To take him back would be a mistake.
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 10:08 am
Can someone explain this Adkins deal?
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 10:14 am
not worth it, he's showed glimpses but is not a regular member of the eagles,we need someone fresh to the club. We're cashed up we have to pull off a coup.
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 10:20 am
You guys overrate Adkins. He has done hardly anything. If anything, he is a handy player off the bench, that is all.
I like the kid, but he would be player off the bench. I don't think we would take him back anyway.
He played 17 games this year for 128 kicks, 41 disposals (169 disposals).
55 marks, 13 goals, 7 behinds, 21 tackles.
Averages:
Kicks
7.5
Handballs
2.4
Disposals
9.9
Marks
3.2
Goals
0.8
Behinds
0.4
Tackles
1.2
http://www.footywire.com/fw/web/ft_play ... le?pid=456
I like the kid, but he would be player off the bench. I don't think we would take him back anyway.
He played 17 games this year for 128 kicks, 41 disposals (169 disposals).
55 marks, 13 goals, 7 behinds, 21 tackles.
Averages:
Kicks
7.5
Handballs
2.4
Disposals
9.9
Marks
3.2
Goals
0.8
Behinds
0.4
Tackles
1.2
http://www.footywire.com/fw/web/ft_play ... le?pid=456
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 10:27 am
They are Lokanesque stats.
No fanx!
The Dude
No fanx!
The Dude
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 10:31 am
God Lokan would be happy to hear that! 
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 10:33 am
Daks, we can't explain it, because we don't know the specifics.
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 10:38 am
We got rid of hm after OP.
We sent him to West Coast, to a hard running deck, where his pace would be a standout. He is presently probably just in their best 24. He'd struggle to get a game at Collingwood in the same situation.
Chipper is a great bloke, but we don't need another reserves player.
We sent him to West Coast, to a hard running deck, where his pace would be a standout. He is presently probably just in their best 24. He'd struggle to get a game at Collingwood in the same situation.
Chipper is a great bloke, but we don't need another reserves player.
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 11:15 am
Sqwaark! (Seagull)