Matthew Francis, Brad Smith, Robert Schaeffer, Steve McKee.
Why did Collingwood always draft a Richmond ruckmen?
An interesting list
Moderator: bbmods
- brodie_rocks!
- Posts: 188
- Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2001 6:01 pm
- Location: VIC
We could make a list as long as your arm on the trades that have involved Richmond. problem is, apart from the odd one or two, Richmond have come out on top, especially lately. Keep away from those sh#t players from Richscum. I fear that there is one more to come across. A player that MM has described as the best small forward in the league. Daffy Schmuck. I may consider skiing if that King of Duds comes to Collingwood.
Be Warned Judkins, this club ain't big enough for Daffy and me.
Pies R Us
Be Warned Judkins, this club ain't big enough for Daffy and me.
Pies R Us
-
- Posts: 1350
- Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2001 6:01 pm
- Location: Melb
As many have said, and I can only agree with, Clinton King is a very good player. He is a "true rover" which is a rearety in the modern ruck rover dominated game. No doubt we came out worst from that deal.
1 point:
King is a worse kick than those who are regularly canned in this forum for their poor disposal. some of those players will also go. I like King because he gets the ball in tight and gets it out. He has pace and with a good run run with injuries (which he surely deserves) he will be a good player for Richmond. He will always have the cloud over his head because he can't kick well short and can't kick long at all.
1 point:
King is a worse kick than those who are regularly canned in this forum for their poor disposal. some of those players will also go. I like King because he gets the ball in tight and gets it out. He has pace and with a good run run with injuries (which he surely deserves) he will be a good player for Richmond. He will always have the cloud over his head because he can't kick well short and can't kick long at all.