GB votes - Pies v. Hawks
- Donny
- Posts: 80262
- Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2002 6:01 pm
- Location: Toonumbar NSW Australia
- Has liked: 63 times
- Been liked: 27 times
GB votes - Pies v. Hawks
Let's hear ya !!
3. Swan
2. Ball
3. Pendles
3. Swan
2. Ball
3. Pendles
Last edited by Donny on Tue Aug 31, 2010 9:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Donny.
It's a game. Enjoy it.
It's a game. Enjoy it.
-
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2010 5:24 pm
3. swan - not at his best but had 34 and a goal
2. welly - one of the few mids to show any spark
1. reid - switched between roughy and franklin and their goals were mainly when he was on the other. solid comeback.
congrats to josh on 200 (and probably last). had just 7 touches but thought his ruck work was good (28 hit outs) and allowed jolly to be dangerous up forward. blair and ball tried hard with 7 tackles each and dawes showed glimpses. roll on finals.
2. welly - one of the few mids to show any spark
1. reid - switched between roughy and franklin and their goals were mainly when he was on the other. solid comeback.
congrats to josh on 200 (and probably last). had just 7 touches but thought his ruck work was good (28 hit outs) and allowed jolly to be dangerous up forward. blair and ball tried hard with 7 tackles each and dawes showed glimpses. roll on finals.
- Monco Matt
- Posts: 3093
- Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 12:47 am
- Location: Sittin, Drinkin, Reloadin & Waitin
Re: GB votes - Pies v. Hawks
+1Donny wrote:Let's hear ya !!
3. Swan
2. Ball
3. Pendles
RED "BABY" CAVANAUGH: Didn't hear what the bet was.
MONCO: Your life.
MONCO: Your life.
- think positive
- Posts: 40237
- Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:33 pm
- Location: somewhere
- Has liked: 339 times
- Been liked: 103 times
- Captain_MyCaptain
- Posts: 3070
- Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 9:20 pm
- Location: home
-
- Posts: 13521
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 11:29 am
- Piethagoras' Theorem
- Posts: 19603
- Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 1:09 pm
- Has liked: 1 time
- Been liked: 17 times
-
- Posts: 13521
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 11:29 am
- Neil Appleby
- Posts: 4068
- Joined: Wed Feb 11, 1998 11:10 am
- Location: Melbourne
- Big T
- Posts: 10228
- Joined: Sat Oct 18, 2003 1:31 am
- Location: Torino, Italy
- Has liked: 6 times
- Been liked: 82 times
Disposal efficiency was poor.AN_Inkling wrote:Noticed a few seem to have missed the best afield today. Just a stat for you: Swan - 12 clearances. Carry on...
We don't always immediately agree with everything you say Ink, only about 90% of it. I will put your Swan comments in the other 10%.
Buon Giorno
-
- Posts: 13521
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 11:29 am
Well, nobody's perfect. But, get that 90% up to 95-100 and you'd be close .Big T wrote:Disposal efficiency was poor.AN_Inkling wrote:Noticed a few seem to have missed the best afield today. Just a stat for you: Swan - 12 clearances. Carry on...
We don't always immediately agree with everything you say Ink, only about 90% of it. I will put your Swan comments in the other 10%.
Well done boys!