Ahmad Saad NO!

All trade and draft talk here thanks..... this means you DTM!!!!

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
inxs88
Posts: 6406
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2014 8:27 pm
Been liked: 4 times

Ahmad Saad NO!

Post by inxs88 »

Please don't even go near him in either the National or rookie draft. One trick pony and annoying one at that (re goal kicking run up)
I love the Pies, hate Carlscum
Top
User avatar
Dave The Man
Posts: 44968
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:04 pm
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
Been liked: 5 times
Contact:
Contact Dave The Man

Post by Dave The Man »

Well I have Read we have Gurnateed him we pick him at Pick 48
I am Da Man
Top
User avatar
swoop42
Posts: 22046
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 9:27 pm
Location: The 18
Been liked: 3 times

Post by swoop42 »

Dave The Man wrote:Well I have Read we have Gurnateed him we pick him at Pick 48
Read where?

Provide link.

I know there are some rumours of us selecting him over at bigfooty but I can't imagine we'd need to use pick 48 to get him.

More a pick 85/rookie selection at best.

Personally I hope zero interest in him and do not want.
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD!
Top
User avatar
Dave The Man
Posts: 44968
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:04 pm
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
Been liked: 5 times
Contact:
Contact Dave The Man

Post by Dave The Man »

swoop42 wrote:
Dave The Man wrote:Well I have Read we have Gurnateed him we pick him at Pick 48
Read where?

Provide link.

I know there are some rumours of us selecting him over at bigfooty but I can't imagine we'd need to use pick 48 to get him.

More a pick 85/rookie selection at best.

Personally I hope zero interest in him and do not want.
In the Draft Rumor Thread. Someone said We have told him we pick at 48
I am Da Man
Top
User avatar
Podpicken
Posts: 2088
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2006 8:05 pm

Post by Podpicken »

I'd be disappointed with that. I think rookie at best, all depending on whether we've met that particular requirement with this draft. Not sure he's the answer when having a choice of a top 50 kid in the land or him.
Billy Picken, the great No. 25 in the sky!
Top
User avatar
winpies
Posts: 573
Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2009 12:04 pm
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 14 times

Post by winpies »

carn the mighty pies!
Top
User avatar
duggieboy
Posts: 590
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 6:08 pm
Has liked: 13 times
Been liked: 3 times

Post by duggieboy »

I'm with you inxs - saw him play in Wellington and feel we could do much better with the upside that a newby will bring - but stranger things have happened!
Top
User avatar
John Wren
Posts: 24186
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:28 pm

Post by John Wren »

Dave The Man wrote:
swoop42 wrote:
Dave The Man wrote:Well I have Read we have Gurnateed him we pick him at Pick 48
Read where?

Provide link.

I know there are some rumours of us selecting him over at bigfooty but I can't imagine we'd need to use pick 48 to get him.

More a pick 85/rookie selection at best.

Personally I hope zero interest in him and do not want.
In the Draft Rumor Thread. Someone said We have told him we pick at 48
you wouldn't want to offer anything other than a late round pick or a rookie spot. his goal kicking is around 63% (not including oob).
Purveyor of sanctimonious twaddle.
Top
inxs88
Posts: 6406
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2014 8:27 pm
Been liked: 4 times

Post by inxs88 »

we would have been better off selecting jeff garlett (if we are pursuing this type of recruit) even though he is a jib
I love the Pies, hate Carlscum
Top
watt price tully
Posts: 20842
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 1:14 pm

Post by watt price tully »

inxs88 wrote:we would have been better off selecting jeff garlett (if we are pursuing this type of recruit) even though he is a jib
Does jib mean squib?

Or is it a derivation from Gip, i.e. Gypsy or more accurately for him an Egyptian, both parents I thought were Olympic representatives from Egypt or some such thing :?
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
Top
User avatar
Jezza
Posts: 29175
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:28 pm
Location: Ponsford End
Has liked: 127 times
Been liked: 191 times

Post by Jezza »

Strange rumour. I would have thought Hine and Rendall would look at a young kid who hasn't been through the AFL system lately instead of Saad but they must think he's worth looking at.

Admittedly we do we need a small forward though and looking at his stats from 2012 and 2013, Saad can find the goals but he doesn't get a lot of the ball and can go missing quite often.

Just read the article and it says we could take him in the rookie draft. That's not so bad and we wouldn't lose too much if it fails.
🏆 | 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 | 🏆
Top
User avatar
King Malta
Posts: 1641
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2008 7:05 am
Location: Gettin' Wiggy

Post by King Malta »

Got no issues with taking him in the Rookie Draft if the club deems he fills a need in our team (and like Jezza said, another small forward is on that needs list).
Top
User avatar
jackcass
Posts: 12529
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:17 pm
Location: Bendigo

Post by jackcass »

Would rather the club look at a McLean or Langdon type in the draft to fill the small forward void. They'd definitely have more upside
Top
User avatar
roar
Posts: 4083
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 2:55 pm
Been liked: 3 times

Post by roar »

I'd be super disappointed if that rumour turned out to be true. Reckon it's total BS, though.
kill for collingwood!
Top
User avatar
Presti35
Posts: 19521
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2001 6:01 pm
Location: London, England
Has liked: 162 times
Been liked: 59 times

Post by Presti35 »

As a rookie selection, I say take him.
A Goal Saved Is 2 Goals Earned!
Top
Post Reply

Return to “The Draft & Trade Moot (DTM) forum”