Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index
 The RulesThe Rules FAQFAQ
   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch 
Log inLog in RegisterRegister
 
Post Match. Pies down to Eagles. All comments please.

Users browsing this topic:0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 0 Guests
Registered Users: None

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> Match
 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 8, 9, 10 ... 12, 13, 14  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Jezza Taurus

2023 PREMIERS!


Joined: 05 Sep 2010
Location: Ponsford End

PostPosted: Sun Apr 07, 2019 1:04 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Magpietothemax wrote:
To Jezza
I thought we did OK aerially. I thought actually that we clearly prepared big time for the aerial contest, but neglected the aspect of ground ball contest. They smashed us at ground level for the contested ball. We need to analyse that aspect of the game, and how it happened.

Interestingly, we won the contested ball count and had 134 contested possessions which was exactly the same as last week. In contrast, the Eagles had 126.

Our contested ball count across the three weeks has been consistent. 137 in round 1 against Geelong and 134 in the last two matches so I don't think it's a massive issue for us in my opinion.

The more pressing concern for mine was the midfielders inability to run both ways tonight and some of the decision making coming out of our back half was poor which led to easy goals for the Eagles. This was something Buckley highlighted after the round 1 loss and stated was a concern over the pre-season period.

_________________
| 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 |
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Magpietothemax Taurus

magpietothemax


Joined: 27 Apr 2013


PostPosted: Sun Apr 07, 2019 1:21 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Interesting analysis Jezza. I will have to look closer at this. I really thought that the Eagles kept dominating us when the ball hit the ground. One has to acknowledge however that their ability to get numbers at every contest was outstanding, and really blocked our ball movement. Much of the poor decision making from our defensive 50 was caused by the Eagles' unremitting pressure on the ball carrier. Main issue i think is the midfield were not running back enough.
_________________
Free Julian Assange!!
Ice in the veins
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
E 



Joined: 05 May 2010


PostPosted: Sun Apr 07, 2019 3:14 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Magpietothemax wrote:
Interesting analysis Jezza. I will have to look closer at this. I really thought that the Eagles kept dominating us when the ball hit the ground. One has to acknowledge however that their ability to get numbers at every contest was outstanding, and really blocked our ball movement. Much of the poor decision making from our defensive 50 was caused by the Eagles' unremitting pressure on the ball carrier. Main issue i think is the midfield were not running back enough.


i think you will likely find that we were dominant in the first quarter (should have been further in front), and then they controlled from thereafter. i think we probably won the contested footy by a lot in the first quarter.

I really think this is a story of missed chances, with the Eagles really making the most of theirs (including the umpiring gifts). Eagles also seem to score more easily when they had momentum. We just need to find a way to take advantage of our moments of ascendancy.

_________________
Ohhh, the Premiership's a cakewalk .......
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
didick 

didick


Joined: 17 Jun 2009
Location: Brisbane

PostPosted: Sun Apr 07, 2019 4:08 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Was like watching us before 2018 with us outnumbering them at contests yet they would come away with it and then find loose players.
_________________
"The night is a very dark time for me" Chaz Michael Michaels
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
The Boy Who Cried Wolf 



Joined: 26 Sep 2013
Location: We prefer free speech - you know it's right

PostPosted: Sun Apr 07, 2019 4:56 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

didick wrote:
Was like watching us before 2018 with us outnumbering them at contests yet they would come away with it and then find loose players.


That's exactly what it looked like last night. Too many passengers and no one willing to actually 'win' the ball

_________________
All Aboard!! Choo Choo!!!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
think positive Libra

Side By Side


Joined: 30 Jun 2005
Location: somewhere

PostPosted: Sun Apr 07, 2019 6:37 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

The Boy Who Cried Wolf wrote:
didick wrote:
Was like watching us before 2018 with us outnumbering them at contests yet they would come away with it and then find loose players.


That's exactly what it looked like last night. Too many passengers and no one willing to actually 'win' the ball


Actually you guys are right, she’ll shocked?

Agree with E too, we just needed to step up. I’m guessing we go5 a little fun shy too, I’m still pissed at how many tines they were allowed to sit on our players after a mark, the Howe thing really burns

_________________
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
DT 



Joined: 06 May 2007


PostPosted: Sun Apr 07, 2019 6:51 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Glad to read some good thoughts now on what happened.

How can we improve?

We need Sier fit and firing - he is a big aggressive midfielder who can win centre clearances.

I think we need a fit Ben Reid to play as a third tall. Our forward line is just too height deficient for the Eagles. Reid would change the balance.

A new player or two - let’s hope Quaynor and Brown or Daicos step up this year as we need a couple of young blokes to freshen us up a bit.

Aside from Adams and De Goey, I did not see a lot of onfield leadership last night. Why is this? We don’t have a Dane Swan anymore who could change a game when the tide was turning against us. We need to develop this.

I agree that Treloar Pendlebury Sidebottom and Beams hardly fires a shot☹️. The coaches need to lay it on them to lift. They are not fighting back enough. Perhaps we could run Maynard through the middle too as he is aggressive.

They are my best guess now for what could happen.

Let’s hope we bounce back strongly next week.

_________________
Daicos, impossible angle ... Goal!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
derkd 



Joined: 29 May 2013


PostPosted: Sun Apr 07, 2019 7:52 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Two major problems from last night.

1. After about halfway in the second term our midfield workrate fell away drastically. West Coast lifted. Our midfield did not work back hard enough how often did we see them go forward into an open paddock where Ryan or another small had so much space. Meanwhile our forward line was clogged.

2. Our forward entries fell to bits once they got the backline structure. All last week we were discussing the concern that if we just bomb it in they will just pick us off....what were we doing in the 3rd and 4th quarters??? Just bombing it into Cox. It was far too predictable.


We shall find out how good we are over the next two games. Lose those and I fear for all our "tallent" we may just be making up the numbers this year.

_________________
"To know nothing of events before your birth, is to forever remain a child" - Cicero (Roman Lawyer/Senator) 46 BCE.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
warburton lad 



Joined: 26 Aug 2003


PostPosted: Sun Apr 07, 2019 7:52 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Our glass is 'half-full' at the moment; how I wish my health would allow me to get there to see our beloved Magpies train and play.

Ive jotted down some musings after watching the last quarter and a bit on replay this morning and having watched our first two games several times.

Varcoe (speed) Sier (grunt) and Hoskin-Elliott (class and capacity to finish) are required in the 22 when the latter two are fit.

Perhaps Appleby for Aish?

When Hoskin-Elliott gets back, time to rotate Stevo/Elliot/DeGoey & WHE out of the square; each man is potent when given the slightest opportunity one-out.

Sier is a critical component in the centre square set-up; he frees up other mids no end.

Varcoe down back releases Maynard into the midfield which is a risk worth taking- we gain an elite kicker in the back half, losing nothing in aggression, and allow Maynard the chance to further develop his all-round game. Maynard off a wing may allow Sidebottom (an instinctive goal-kicker) to ply his ware closer to goal.

A fit Reidy would certainly improve our stock of talks in the forward line, but I feel that is a forlorn hope these days. Goldsack would be a strong addition, but one could not play him and Mihocek in the same forward line at the expense of a quicker forward.

Our next-Gen Pies (C.Brown, T.Brown, Kelly, Bosenavulagi, Quaynor, Murphy, Lynch, Daicos, and perhaps the two Irish lads) will all be fine players, but offer no great depth in 2019.

As always, defeats make us supporters of this club glum and look at the glass as half-empty. Improved form, supported by a few wins, makes that glass seem half-full again.

Plaudits to the West Coast who bested us again on our own turf; its time for the Carringbush of old to rise to the challenge and go one better in 2019.

_________________
Firm in the belief that number 17 flag is only months away...
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Johnno75 



Joined: 07 Oct 2010
Location: Wantirna

PostPosted: Sun Apr 07, 2019 8:00 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Especially in the 2nd qtr it was the quality of their Centre Clearances. There is a clearance and then there is a clearance that is delivered 30m out to an open forward line.

The disconnection between Grundy and our mids was completely off. Their midfield got first hands on ball out of centre (when damage was done in 2nd qtr) mostly from Grundy.

_________________
Human behavioural studies suggest people who use a lot of swear words tend to be more honest & trustworthy.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
LaurieHolden Aquarius

Floreat Gymnorhina tyrannica


Joined: 22 Feb 2009
Location: Victoria Park

PostPosted: Sun Apr 07, 2019 8:18 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

RudeBoy wrote:
Before the season started I pointed out that we ranked 13th for centre clearances last year, and unfortunately this remains our achilles heal.

I also think our criss cross chippy kicking worked well against the Tigers, as they fell back and allowed us to move the ball around at will. The Eagles however, were expecting this and they maintained a press, which unsettled our team.


Correct RB. We need an injection of grunt in the engine room. Eagles smashed us at the ruck contest. Was like Seniors against an U19 side.

Last week the Tigers backline was in disarray without their General. We easily worked our way through their defence to open up our run. It perhaps masked what inevitably unfolded last night. WCE shut us down off half back.

Our best - JDG, Maynard, Grundy, Adams, Mayne. Didn't get pushed around, put their head over the ball.

We clearly need another mobile, big bodied mid. Not just against WCE, week in week out. When JDG went in his class and size had immediate impact.
I thought that was one of the best games I've seen Maynard play. His last 10 games show me someone that has matured sufficiently to be rotated in the middle.
Concern is doing it now as I haven't seen him train in that position.
If, and I say if Maynard has arrived in this capacity and can have a crack in the middle, we avoid material structure disruption.
Treloar isn't a centre, he won't replace Pendles. We need plan B. Treloar is an outside runner, put him on the wing.

I haven't seen the reserves results however this much vaunted list depth will need to be tested.

3 players under the microscope. (4 if you include Varcoe)
I'm done on the Phillips experiment, he's a downhill skier whom doesn't deliver impact against the top sides.
Thomas has had a poor start to the season. I suspect we won't be seeing him next week on that output.
Poor Stepho was caught out defensively and out-bodied but he'll develop on both of those fronts. I do worry about the amount of footy he's played. I reckon he might need some management before long.

The wrap up was WCE remain the benchmark. We've had 4 cracks at WCE and their system works better against ours.
We're remain a contender but we've only improved on paper from 2018.
It's Round 3, we'll adjust and respond but the likes of Thomas, Phillips, Varcoe don't give us the additional gears and grunt required. I'll welcome some fresh faces soon, T Brown, Appleyard, Wills and we're a better side with the likes of a fit WHE and Sier.

_________________
"The Club's not Jock, Ted and Gerry" (& Eddie)
2023 AFL Premiers
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
burnsy17 Virgo



Joined: 10 Aug 2003


PostPosted: Sun Apr 07, 2019 8:19 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Absolutely right. No idea how Grundy and the mids can have such a disconnect considering the train together every day and you’d presume they’ve worked out a few strategies at the bounce!

Grundy pretty much played for west coast last night!

His tap work to the mids was shocking. The mids roving to his ruckwork was shocking. Who is our mid coach in 2019?

_________________
Beware the swooping Magpie.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
swooper 



Joined: 24 Sep 2002
Location: Melbourne

PostPosted: Sun Apr 07, 2019 8:40 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Jezza wrote:
The Eagles deserved the win. There's no disputing that and it's evident they have the wood over us and trouble us the most out of any side (outside of the Hawks).

The hype around the midfield needs to stop. We have a good group of players in the middle but the ongoing criticism of them not running both ways has legitimacy. When they're on fire, they're one of the best group of mids going around but the question is whether they can lift during times of adversity.

I think what killed us was three things. Firstly, we were dominated in the centre clearances in the second quarter when the Eagles kicked six goals in the quarter and we couldn't seem to find an answer to curtail it. Secondly, the Eagles defensive structures choked our forward line structures so opportunities felt limited and difficult and the passage into the forward 50 lacked fluidity. Lastly, the Eagles dominate us aerially which is something they did last year and we haven't been able to find an answer in countering.

The smooth transition of ball in hand from last week didn't work this week. I think Magpietothemax is right to point out that we're trying to emulate the Eagles game style but we've yet to master it. It worked well against the Tigers, but it was ineffective this week. In the long run, I suspect we'll stick to that sort of game plan as we shift away from Richmond's tackling pressure game style and relying on the ball to hit the ground which can be effective but was countered by the Eagles game plan and is too taxing on the players.

With respect to the positives, Adams was our best midfielder of the night. Had a very good return game and took the game on at every opportunity. De Goey was considered quiet but still kicked 3 goals. One of these days, he's going to dominate and destroy a team.

1-2 isn't ideal, but we were in the same position this time last year so plenty of time to rectify things. The Eagles are the benchmark of the competition going forward. I think the hype around Geelong is overstated at this stage, but admittedly they haven't put a foot wrong so far this season.

Time to get back on track this Friday night against the Dogs.


Well said Jezza. I would also add Darcy to the positives. Hope his good form continues.
BTW does anyone else have PTSD when the Eagles chant went up? 😟
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Pies4shaw Leo

pies4shaw


Joined: 08 Oct 2007


PostPosted: Sun Apr 07, 2019 8:48 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Our number one problem is that our midfield needs to be reconfigured. When your ruckman has 40 hitouts and 11 clearances and his opponent has 7 hitouts and 5 clearances (and not one after half time), you should have the ball going your way and be dominating. However, our next three best clearance players last night (Adams, Pendlebury and Sidebottom) had another 11 between them and then no-one else had much impact at the first contest.

Also, if you try to get past the total disposals figures and look at what use our mids are making of their touches, only Adams and Sidebottom had more than a dozen kicks. Meanwhile, Howe, Maynard, Mayne and Langdon had more kicks between them than Pendlebury, Treloar, Beams and Phillips did - we're not going to win too many games of football when that happens (because it means much of our kicking is happening too deep in defence). Putting aside the question whether it helps the team's cause for Adams to be doing so much of the kicking (rather than feeding it out to the better users), it doesn't look to me like the players are working well together or that our midfield, as a whole, is playing as the sum of its parts.

Also - and I said this last week during the second quarter of the Richmond game, some of the mids' decision-making is bordering upon the childish. They keep getting caught on the spread because too many of them run at the opposition player with the ball - in that situation, it just takes one tiny half-handball or knock/fumble the other way from the guy they have all run down and suddenly Brodie is left trying to chase 3 opposition midfielders. That, generally speaking, ends badly. I don't know whether we are doing this because, as a group, our mids don't have confidence that one chaser/tackler will be able to do the job or whether, as yet, our mids haven't really worked out how to play together.

Finally on our midfield - and I say this advisedly - Beams is getting too much of the outside ball. He is as slow as a coach (well, probably slower than our coach - but you know what I mean) and is, too often, forced to kick down the line to a contest. It is the wrong mix for us for him to be getting 2.5 or 3 times as much outside ball as inside ball. If you look at his stats last year, he got 16 of his 18 Brownlow votes in games where he had at least 14 contested possessions (his other 2 votes came in a 10-goal thrashing of Hawthorn when, it's fair to say, he probably wasn't needed on the inside too much). Last night, he had 8 contested possessions and 19 uncontested - in round 23 last year, he had 17 contested and 16 uncontested against the same team - even with that more inside game, he managed 2 goals and got a Brownlow vote. The problem for us is that when he's getting the uncontested ball on the outside, Treloar (who can run out of sight on a dark night), Pendlebury and Sidebottom (both of whom are much better users of the ball outside goal-kicking distance than Beams) are not.

Hopefully, the midfield coach can sort out these balance issues because, if they aren't fixed, I doubt that we can be more than a mid-tier team.

I'm not really a fan of Wills and Sier still looks a fair way off playing AFL but I wonder whether at least the tackling problem in the centre might be reduced if one or other of those players could play as a defensive, tackling workhorse mid. I'm not especially confident in wondering that but I do think that something needs to change promptly or we are going to belt the poor teams (because, whatever the structural problems in our midfield, our midfielders are collectively, by and large, better than most of our opponents') and struggle against the good ones.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Mr Miyagi 



Joined: 14 Sep 2018


PostPosted: Sun Apr 07, 2019 8:56 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

One moment stood out We had three players to one (Yeo) contesting the ball on the wing. Our players stood there, allowed Yeo to pick the ball up and kick forward. They were holding back as if scared of giving away a free kick for holding the man. Get the f******* ball ffs!!! There were three of you to one!!!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> Match All times are GMT + 10 Hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 8, 9, 10 ... 12, 13, 14  Next
Page 9 of 14   

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum



Privacy Policy

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group