DEPARTURES PLEASE

[CQ]

the way so many people rave about cole is unbelievable. he makes that many clangers its not funny.

anyway JOEL who do you think we should get rid of?
we cant have the same players all the time and cole is one of them! i reckon he will be on the cards to be traded, along with lokan, swan, mckee, mcgough, and davis. oh, and not to mention williams! more like the delisting card!
i also reckon shackelton is overrated and overweight!

kinnear still has a yaer of contract to go eh? damn, im tipping he will be delisted next year at the latest.

[The Prototype]

He won't be delisted, because he retired, so it was earlier then you thought.

[Yobbo^LuKa]

[Johnson#26]

Pros: Cole, can break the lines, tackle hard and has pretty good kicking skills and his work rate is high. A bit of a Gavin Brown when it mcomes to leadership.

Cons: Sometimes his composure can slip and he messes up, or he is overconfident or eager and takes his eye off the ball.

That adds up to a pretty good player, one who needs a little more time to iron out his problems - and I'm sure thats what MM will be doing over summer.

On the subject of delisting, Lokan should be looked at with trading and delisting. Face it - he only wins 4-6 touches a game and sometimes tries too hard! I really like him as a person and a guy who is despirite to put his body on the line but if we want premierships, if we can trade him - we should.

[Joel]

[CQ]

what 'program' would that be? reading every little detail about footy? sorry i have other interests in life other than footy, unlike some of the desperados in here, which includes you.

btw good kinnear retired, now they dont have to pay him out. I'd like to know whos brainwave it was to resign him for 2 years in the first place.

[Joel]

CQ, there have been several topics on here recently.

The only reason I'm on the bloody computer, is because I've got shitloads of uni assignments - and I leave Nick's open in the background while I'm doing them (I tell you what, I'm sick of the sight of the computer). If you don't believe me, I'll send you the assignment I'm doing right now. Having said that, I shouldn't have to justify myself to you.

Why do you feel it necessary to resort to personal attacks on people? It's a weakness in argument more than anything. Do you feel tough?

Bitter, bitter, bitter.

[The Prototype]

[dangerousdyl]

obree- gets a lot of the ball but his possessions don't hurt opposition, is pretty one dimensional, does get to the contest though and has pretty good hands and a good head for the game
verdict- keep him

davis- is inconsistent, soft, shits himself in big games,
verdict-i would get rid of him

lokan- don't need to say much after those shampoo ads, pretty streaky, can be valuable but can also be terrible and lose his head
verdict- get rid of him

cole- the only aboriginal in the afl who can't play footy, a tribute to our recruiters who provided us with duds throughout the 90's
verdict-must go

tarrant- what a talent, can play, can play, sometimes looks disinterested, is he commited?, huge arms, win's games and set's up goals, takes a grab, what more do u want from the bloke? garkill are u mentally sane?
verdict-don't you dare think of it

[The Prototype]

Cole could become a decent player, I would give him another go.

[HAL]

Try saying that with less context.

[^*Cl|T*^]

O'Bree Gets a lot of the ball. Has the ability with his disposal to really hurt .... Hurt his own team that is!

[Johnson#26]

O'Bree must go. Why keep him after three below par years? He was good in 2000 and very good in 2001 then tailled off. There is no need for passengers on this list.

[HAL]

When was he? There never is.

[The Prototype]