Umpiring last night
Users browsing this topic:0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 0 Guests
Registered Users: None |
 |
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Stinga
Joined: 31 May 2008
Location: Pies Territory
|
| Post subject: |  |
|
| tbaker wrote: | | Pies4shaw wrote: | | I have no idea whyGeelong would think they got the rough end of the pineapple. They gave away quite a few 50s that weren’t called against them and, has already been said, Hawkins spent the night not being called for shoving opponents in the back. Some of what they got away with was remarkable. Nothing new in that against the Pies, I suppose. Perhaps they think they would have got even more gifts if they’d played at home in front of 30,000 Geelong fans and no Collingwood supporters. |
Yep...Hawkins seems to get away with it week after week (not just against us), and of course he keeps doing it because he rarely gets pinged for it. And don't forget the howler in the last qtr where Mihocek had his head almost whacked clean off during a marking attempt just outside our goalsquare - pay that and it would've been game over a lot earlier. |
The Mihocek non free-kick was a disgrace, they're either cheats or totally incompetent. It was so farking obvious it was unbelievable it wasn't paid. It would surely have sealed the game and given us a stress free last quarter. The Hawkins pushes in back were infuriating, obvious pushes not holding ground. The Danger one is a free kick every day of the week, it was a dangerous attempt taking out the legs which is exactly what the rule was designed for. |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
|
|
The Rules
FAQ
Usergroups
Calendar
Search
Log in
Register
