| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Daks 
Joined: 19 Aug 2003
Location: Melbourne.
|
| Post subject: |  |
|
| 3rd degree wrote: | | Why Not pick 52 and Dr Alf Andrews for Joel Smith? - Dunstall would be stoked. |
Haven't we already delisted Alf?. |
|
|
|
 |
Joel 
Joined: 23 Mar 1999
Location: Mornington Peninsula
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Dermie is in - will let you know what he says when they ask him. |
|
|
|
|
Pa Marmo
Side by Side
Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Location: Nicks BB member #617
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Joel what is the link for sen
_________________
Genesis 1:1 |
|
|
|
|
Streak 
Joined: 05 Oct 2004
Location: Melbourne
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Da suspense is moidah! |
|
|
|
|
swoop
Joined: 25 Nov 2003
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| I would trade pick 7 for J. Smith. He is what we need, a pacey hbf with excellelent disposal skills. |
|
|
|
|
Joel
Joined: 23 Mar 1999
Location: Mornington Peninsula
|
|
|
|
|
Joel
Joined: 23 Mar 1999
Location: Mornington Peninsula
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Btw, they have avoided asking him so far, because they are interviewing some bloke.
Glenn Robbins I think, who knows why. |
|
|
|
|
Pa Marmo
Side by Side
Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Location: Nicks BB member #617
|
| Post subject: | |
|
thanks mate
_________________
Genesis 1:1 |
|
|
|
|
Streak
Joined: 05 Oct 2004
Location: Melbourne
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Bah, he'll probably be all cagey and shit, and refuse to say anything.
Pity there's no Footy Show tonight, though - it would have been a cracker. |
|
|
|
|
blackandwhite4life 
Joined: 23 Dec 2003
Location: sydney
|
| Post subject: | |
|
If we trade either pick 7 or Lonie for Smith we are f**kin insane.
O'Bree, McG or pick 23; some combination of no more than 2 of these. Can't see why the Hawks wouldn't take either player as they are going to need some good honest midfielders. We simply have too many of this type.
Smith adds a lot more to our overall team than either of these 2 but I don't think he's worth a "lucrative" contract.
_________________
Hearing the 'Black & White Army' roar is the greatest sound in the world. |
|
|
|
|
Johnson#26
Joined: 18 Dec 2003
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| I wouldn't do it. We have players exactly the same as him (Johnson and Cole). Why stunt their growth? If we were to get him, it would have to be O'Bree + Shaw/McGough. No more then that. He gets many of his kicks short across the backline. He is not needed. Is there any news on the deal? |
|
|
|
|
Joel
Joined: 23 Mar 1999
Location: Mornington Peninsula
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| If he refuses to say anything, I think that means something. |
|
|
|
|
BBHS 
bbhs
Joined: 30 Jun 2004
Location: Bellarine
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| bloody kath and kim bullshit |
|
|
|
|
3rd degree 
Joined: 22 Jun 2004
Location: John Wren's tote
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Daks wrote: | | 3rd degree wrote: | | Why Not pick 52 and Dr Alf Andrews for Joel Smith? - Dunstall would be stoked. |
Haven't we already delisted Alf?. |
No but we almost lost him to Port! |
|
|
|
|
Joel
Joined: 23 Mar 1999
Location: Mornington Peninsula
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Johnson#26 wrote: | | I wouldn't do it. We have players exactly the same as him (Johnson and Cole). Why stunt their growth? If we were to get him, it would have to be O'Bree + Shaw/McGough. No more then that. He gets many of his kicks short across the backline. He is not needed. Is there any news on the deal? |
He would add plenty to our side. A fair bit anyway. Allows us to be a bit more flexible.
Like I said, I wouldn't do it for Pick 7, but if we can get him, we might as well.
Getting him wouldn't stunt the growth of Cole and Johnson, it would allow them to take on a more midfield oriented role. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Rules
FAQ
Usergroups
Calendar
Search
Log in
Register
