| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Az
Joined: 25 Sep 2013
|
| Post subject: |  |
|
Lol at everyone saying Keeffe is no big loss. A 204 cm 100 kg mobile key position player of which any club would be climbing over eachother to get at under different circumstances. Don't let your frustrations get in the way of the facts. Here's a fact. If by chance one of our big guys goes down, every one of you would be thinking "mmm yes, Keeffe would be pretty handy right about now." He is a significant loss to a team who's KPP stocks are already running thin.
Get a grip |
|
|
|
 |
HAL
Please don't shout at me - I can't help it.
Joined: 17 Mar 2003
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Where can I get one? |
|
|
|
|
Pies2016
Joined: 12 Sep 2014
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Az wrote: | Lol at everyone saying Keeffe is no big loss. A 204 cm 100 kg mobile key position player of which any club would be climbing over eachother to get at under different circumstances. Don't let your frustrations get in the way of the facts. Here's a fact. If by chance one of our big guys goes down, every one of you would be thinking "mmm yes, Keeffe would be pretty handy right about now." He is a significant loss to a team who's KPP stocks are already running thin.
Get a grip |
^^
Absolutely |
|
|
|
|
Culprit 
Joined: 06 Feb 2003
Location: Port Melbourne
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Az wrote: | Lol at everyone saying Keeffe is no big loss. A 204 cm 100 kg mobile key position player of which any club would be climbing over eachother to get at under different circumstances. Don't let your frustrations get in the way of the facts. Here's a fact. If by chance one of our big guys goes down, every one of you would be thinking "mmm yes, Keeffe would be pretty handy right about now." He is a significant loss to a team who's KPP stocks are already running thin.
Get a grip |
It's no good worrying about them, they will not play AFL for a few years. Time to remove them off the clubs list and move on. For those who suggest they may be found not guilty, sure and Politicians tell the truth.  |
|
|
|
|
bally12 
Joined: 29 Sep 2010
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| swoop42 wrote: | Assuming they do I wonder how long cocaine traces last in hair samples?
If they could prove they have taken cocaine in the past via the hair samples I wonder if that would give them and ASADA enough wiggle room to hand down a lesser penalty of say 12 months due to the unique circumstances. |
Unfortunately for them, they cannot claim inadvertent ingestion of the banned drug in the situation where it was laced together with the illicit drug they knowingly took. It's a clearly stated rule.
The only thing in their favour is that their lawyers can argue for a minimum 2yr penalty, instead of a 4yr one, because at the time of the "offense", that was the minimum penalty. Shortly after this minimum penalty was lifted to 4 yrs I believe. |
|
|
|
|
think positive 
Side By Side
Joined: 30 Jun 2005
Location: somewhere
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| swoop42 wrote: | Assuming they do I wonder how long cocaine traces last in hair samples?
If they could prove they have taken cocaine in the past via the hair samples I wonder if that would give them and ASADA enough wiggle room to hand down a lesser penalty of say 12 months due to the unique circumstances. |
That would be good
Also agree, re the silly 'won't be missed' posts. Keefe is a huge loss, and I would have liked to see what josh really had, damn shame
While I get the serve them right crap, I'm still pissed that so drug are getting away with far far far worse stuff. Just wrong
_________________
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either! |
|
|
|
|
Dangles
Balmey Army
Joined: 14 May 2015
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Still no word? |
|
|
|
|
Culprit
Joined: 06 Feb 2003
Location: Port Melbourne
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Dangles wrote: | | Still no word? |
Word on the street is the B Sample was positive and that's no surprise. The Hearing is due shortly and once that is done there will be a media conference with the Club announcing the outcome. |
|
|
|
|
pav
Joined: 03 Jul 2003
Location: Melbourne
|
| Post subject: Keefe and Thomas | |
|
| Channel 7 news promo "bombshell twist in Collingwood drug scandal" Anyone know what this is about? |
|
|
|
|
3rd degree 
Joined: 22 Jun 2004
Location: John Wren's tote
|
| Post subject: | |
|
no involving a blonde or what?
_________________
" Ohhh Banksy and out comes the Note Book".
www.facebook/the hybernators |
|
|
|
|
Steve86 
Joined: 29 May 2006
Location: perth
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| please update us on this accordingly. |
|
|
|
|
SteveH67
Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Location: Canberra, Australia
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Eddie gave them something?
_________________
Social club member 7342 since 2000. |
|
|
|
|
What'sinaname
Joined: 29 May 2010
Location: Living rent free
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Keeffe and Thomas are actually Johnny Depp's dogs.
_________________
Fighting against the objectification of woman. |
|
|
|
|
What'sinaname
Joined: 29 May 2010
Location: Living rent free
|
| Post subject: | |
|
GONESKI.
_________________
Fighting against the objectification of woman. |
|
|
|
|
What'sinaname
Joined: 29 May 2010
Location: Living rent free
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Goodbye Keeffe and Thomas.
_________________
Fighting against the objectification of woman. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Rules
FAQ
Usergroups
Calendar
Search
Log in
Register
