You still owe us Taz

[Cathalyst]

[luvlicca]

did anyone stop to realise that if MM hadnt of played Taz and johnno, we may have ended up losing by a ot more than we did.......

[Cathalyst]

[Cuthbert Collingwood]

i seriously doubt that you want us to play finals footy cathalyst

[luvlicca]

Agree with you Ru, don't even know why he barracks for the pies with an attitude like this...

[Cathalyst]

I have a bad attitude and dont want us to play finals because I believe sending the proper message to our young players is more important in the long run than winning a single game??? Get real guys!

[luvlicca]

oh i noticed that in your i told you so message that you forgot to mention that make robinson mentioned that Taz was ok, and that he showed he cared when he messaged bux while on the footy show to aplogise for the position he had put him in, but you cant tell anyone that can you, cause then it would put doubt into everything that you believe in, which in fact is nothing...

[Cathalyst]

[Cuthbert Collingwood]

cathalyst, how many times do you have to say the same thing? you double post in different topics. you pm people with the same message that you posted, prefaced by the juvenile "i told you so". you start multiple topics on the same subject. you add nothing to the debate apart from the sledgehammer of your views. (note sq3's posting that is on a similar line to yours in that he thinks taz and bj should have been dropped: he makes his point and tries to argue it).

It's never been in question that Taz and BJ broke team rules. They did the crime and got the fine. Where is this rule that players have to be dropped for breaking the rules? you think the kids are gonna go out on the piss thinking taz only got a $5000 fine, so i'll do it. Those kids have seen better than us the crap that those two have been through all week and will definately think twice about being naughty. But, on topic, Taz does still owe the players, i don't think he was the single factor that lost us the game, there were quite a few misjudgements or mistakes throughout that could have led to us kicking a winning score. But then adelaide went inside50 on twelve more occasions than we did and only beat us by 4 points.

cathalyst, you could actually be my very good friend who is a geelong supporter and a rabblerouser. Is that you Jag?

[Cathalyst]

[Pied Piper]

Mate, the fact is other people are allowed to have a different opinion to yourself. Disagreeing with you doesn't necessarily mean having a go at you.

You seem to have a problem in that you need to reply to everyone who dares to disagrees with you, which cheeses us all off because you end up completely dominating this board. It's just not necessary.

It's even less necessary for you to start multiple threads on the same topic. Start a thread and cover all the angles of it you want to to mount an argument. But at the moment it's not possible to visit this BB without reading yourself and RWNR (same person?) weighing into every thread with the same stuff.

So you think Tarrant and BJ should have been dropped. That's fine, many people inside and outside the club agree with you. We get it, OK? But not all of us have to agree.

[Cuthbert Collingwood]

cathalyst, do a post search on what i've said about the whole thing.

and are you my geelong supporting friend? [hehe]

[Cathalyst]

[Pied Piper]

As I've tried to say, it's not your opinion that's the problem, it's your insistence on repeating it ad nauseam in this and several other threads. That's what's boring the pants off me, so I'll do better than leave you alone - I'll place you on ignore.

[Cathalyst]