What pisses you off?
Users browsing this topic:0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 0 Guests
Registered Users: None |
 |
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Wokko 
Come and take it.
Joined: 04 Oct 2005
|
| Post subject: |  |
|
| think positive wrote: |
ha, now just who does the highlighted bit sound like!!
"Currently, many men are opting out of marriage because of unfair divorce and child custody laws. It won't be much longer until we hit a tipping point where men drop out of sexual relationships with women as well," he said.
"Therefore, a feminist victory will be a lonely one for women indeed. 'Where have all the good men gone? They've been scared off by your anti-male war'."
|
So you're saying that if someone holds a view on something you agree with then that means one agrees with the entirety of their viewpoint?
So you'd probably agree that the following would be good laws to enact, considering your well documented feelings about animal rights.
It is forbidden:
1. to so neglect an animal in ones ownership, care or accommodation that it thereby experiences appreciable pain or appreciable damage;
2. to use an animal unnecessarily for what clearly exceeds its powers or causes it appreciable pain, or which it-in consequence of its condition-is obviously not capable of;
3. to use and animal for demonstrations, film-making, spectacles, or other public events to the extent that these events cause the animal appreciable pain or appreciable damage to health;
4. to use a fragile, ill, overworked or old animal for which further life is a torment for any other purpose than to cause or procure a rapid, painless death;
5. to put out ones domestic animal for the purpose of getting rid of it;
6. to set or test the power of dogs on cats, foxes, and other animals;
7. to shorten the ears or the tail of a dog over two weeks old. This is allowed if it is done with anesthesia;
8. to shorten the tail of a horse. This is allowed if it is to remedy a defect or illness of the tail and is done by a veterinarian and under anesthesia;
9. to perform a painful operation on an animal in an unprofessional manner or without anesthesia, or if anesthesia in a particular case is impossible according to veterinary standards;
10. to kill an animal on a farm for fur otherwise than with anesthesia or in a way that is, in any case, painless;
11. to force-feed fowl;
12. to tear out or separate the thighs of living frogs.
Whose views do THEY sound like? Yeah, yours.
Do you know whose views they are? They're the Animal Protection laws of Nazi Germany enacted by Adolf Hitler. So according to your logic, you're a Nazi.
Yes, that's ridiculous. So is what you were trying to insinuate. |
|
|
|
 |
think positive 
Side By Side
Joined: 30 Jun 2005
Location: somewhere
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Wokko wrote: | | think positive wrote: |
ha, now just who does the highlighted bit sound like!!
"Currently, many men are opting out of marriage because of unfair divorce and child custody laws. It won't be much longer until we hit a tipping point where men drop out of sexual relationships with women as well," he said.
"Therefore, a feminist victory will be a lonely one for women indeed. 'Where have all the good men gone? They've been scared off by your anti-male war'."
|
So you're saying that if someone holds a view on something you agree with then that means one agrees with the entirety of their viewpoint?
So you'd probably agree that the following would be good laws to enact, considering your well documented feelings about animal rights.
It is forbidden:
1. to so neglect an animal in ones ownership, care or accommodation that it thereby experiences appreciable pain or appreciable damage;
2. to use an animal unnecessarily for what clearly exceeds its powers or causes it appreciable pain, or which it-in consequence of its condition-is obviously not capable of;
3. to use and animal for demonstrations, film-making, spectacles, or other public events to the extent that these events cause the animal appreciable pain or appreciable damage to health;
4. to use a fragile, ill, overworked or old animal for which further life is a torment for any other purpose than to cause or procure a rapid, painless death;
5. to put out ones domestic animal for the purpose of getting rid of it;
6. to set or test the power of dogs on cats, foxes, and other animals;
7. to shorten the ears or the tail of a dog over two weeks old. This is allowed if it is done with anesthesia;
8. to shorten the tail of a horse. This is allowed if it is to remedy a defect or illness of the tail and is done by a veterinarian and under anesthesia;
9. to perform a painful operation on an animal in an unprofessional manner or without anesthesia, or if anesthesia in a particular case is impossible according to veterinary standards;
10. to kill an animal on a farm for fur otherwise than with anesthesia or in a way that is, in any case, painless;
11. to force-feed fowl;
12. to tear out or separate the thighs of living frogs.
Whose views do THEY sound like? Yeah, yours.
Do you know whose views they are? They're the Animal Protection laws of Nazi Germany enacted by Adolf Hitler. So according to your logic, you're a Nazi.
Yes, that's ridiculous. So is what you were trying to insinuate. |
at least they had one redeeming feature
i agree with your post you just did in the other thread to, doesnt make me you!
how do you know i had you in mind!!
_________________
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either! |
|
|
|
|
Wokko
Come and take it.
Joined: 04 Oct 2005
|
| Post subject: | |
|
1. History is complicated, even the cartoon villains show some heart sometimes.
2. That's my point 
3. Because I've posted about that exact issue and don't know of anyone else who has. |
|
|
|
|
think positive
Side By Side
Joined: 30 Jun 2005
Location: somewhere
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Hehe at least you know I actually read/ take your posts in!!!
Cheers
_________________
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either! |
|
|
|
|
HAL
Please don't shout at me - I can't help it.
Joined: 17 Mar 2003
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Adios. |
|
|
|
|
Wokko
Come and take it.
Joined: 04 Oct 2005
|
| Post subject: | |
|
It's amazing , disagreement can be discussed and acknowledged through polite conversation and debate and an agreement to respect each other reached even when views are still opposed and haven't changed.
No name calling, no belittling, robust and forthright debate. How refreshing. |
|
|
|
|
think positive
Side By Side
Joined: 30 Jun 2005
Location: somewhere
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Wokko wrote: | It's amazing , disagreement can be discussed and acknowledged through polite conversation and debate and an agreement to respect each other reached even when views are still opposed and haven't changed.
No name calling, no belittling, robust and forthright debate. How refreshing. |
 
_________________
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either! |
|
|
|
|
stui magpie 
Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.
Joined: 03 May 2005
Location: In flagrante delicto
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Awww, you two kids. {arm punch}.
Group hug. 
_________________
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down. |
|
|
|
|
think positive
Side By Side
Joined: 30 Jun 2005
Location: somewhere
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Hehe
I need one of them! My brother in law got his result today, he has a tumour 6.5 cm, and cancer is in both his kidney and his liver. They can't take his kidney yet, because it would be too hard on his body, so he has to have 12 weeks chemo first to try and shrink the tumours. Not good news
_________________
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either! |
|
|
|
|
watt price tully 
Joined: 15 May 2007
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| David wrote: | | I read it. It's pretty brainless, unpleasant and regressive stuff, .......: |
Another pathetic male obsessed with feminism.
_________________
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman |
|
|
|
|
watt price tully
Joined: 15 May 2007
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| think positive wrote: | Hehe
I need one of them! My brother in law got his result today, he has a tumour 6.5 cm, and cancer is in both his kidney and his liver. They can't take his kidney yet, because it would be too hard on his body, so he has to have 12 weeks chemo first to try and shrink the tumours. Not good news |
Terrible news. Best of luck to him.
_________________
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman |
|
|
|
|
HAL
Please don't shout at me - I can't help it.
Joined: 17 Mar 2003
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| watt price tully wrote: | [quote="David"]I read it. It's pretty brainless, unpleasant and regressive stuff, .......:[/quote]
Another pathetic male obsessed with feminism. |
"it" being he or she've been trying to figure out what he or she'm doing wrong can you be his or her mentor? |
|
|
|
|
stui magpie
Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.
Joined: 03 May 2005
Location: In flagrante delicto
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| think positive wrote: | Hehe
I need one of them! My brother in law got his result today, he has a tumour 6.5 cm, and cancer is in both his kidney and his liver. They can't take his kidney yet, because it would be too hard on his body, so he has to have 12 weeks chemo first to try and shrink the tumours. Not good news |
Ahhh %$^$%^&%%.
Hope shit works out. You can do fine on one kidney, provided the one left works properly. The liver is one of the most forgiving organs (I apologise to mine every morning), you can take out a chunk at the rest can still work, so here's hoping.
_________________
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down. |
|
|
|
|
Morrigu 
Joined: 11 Aug 2001
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Wokko wrote: | So you're saying that if someone holds a view on something you agree with then that means one agrees with the entirety of their viewpoint?
So you'd probably agree that the following would be good laws to enact, considering your well documented feelings about animal rights.
It is forbidden:
1. to so neglect an animal in ones ownership, care or accommodation that it thereby experiences appreciable pain or appreciable damage;
2. to use an animal unnecessarily for what clearly exceeds its powers or causes it appreciable pain, or which it-in consequence of its condition-is obviously not capable of;
3. to use and animal for demonstrations, film-making, spectacles, or other public events to the extent that these events cause the animal appreciable pain or appreciable damage to health;
4. to use a fragile, ill, overworked or old animal for which further life is a torment for any other purpose than to cause or procure a rapid, painless death;
5. to put out ones domestic animal for the purpose of getting rid of it;
6. to set or test the power of dogs on cats, foxes, and other animals;
7. to shorten the ears or the tail of a dog over two weeks old. This is allowed if it is done with anesthesia;
8. to shorten the tail of a horse. This is allowed if it is to remedy a defect or illness of the tail and is done by a veterinarian and under anesthesia;
9. to perform a painful operation on an animal in an unprofessional manner or without anesthesia, or if anesthesia in a particular case is impossible according to veterinary standards;
10. to kill an animal on a farm for fur otherwise than with anesthesia or in a way that is, in any case, painless;
11. to force-feed fowl;
12. to tear out or separate the thighs of living frogs.
Whose views do THEY sound like? Yeah, yours.
Do you know whose views they are? They're the Animal Protection laws of Nazi Germany enacted by Adolf Hitler. So according to your logic, you're a Nazi.
Yes, that's ridiculous. So is what you were trying to insinuate. |
 I'm a Nazi!
Mind you goose stepping with this damn clot in my leg is currently out of the question
_________________
“The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated.” |
|
|
|
|
Morrigu
Joined: 11 Aug 2001
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| think positive wrote: | Hehe
I need one of them! My brother in law got his result today, he has a tumour 6.5 cm, and cancer is in both his kidney and his liver. They can't take his kidney yet, because it would be too hard on his body, so he has to have 12 weeks chemo first to try and shrink the tumours. Not good news |
 oh sorry to hear that Jo that is horrible news!
_________________
“The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated.” |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum
|
|
The Rules
FAQ
Usergroups
Calendar
Search
Log in
Register
