Our key forwards
Users browsing this topic:0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 1 Guest
Registered Users: None |
 |
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Mossi 
Joined: 20 May 2002
Location: Vittorio Veneto TV Italy
|
| Post subject: |  |
|
| melliot wrote: | | At $800k a season, that's an expensive decoy. |
 your right! but the Decoy takes at least the best and at times the second best defender as well along with him.
Waiting for Reed to come in and see the difference is the hardest wait of all time. If the midfield is winning it's fair share of the ball Reeds mobility and marking prowess will put most teams including the Hawks in a lot of bother.
I remember Mark Neeld when he was going through his pain at the Dees saying what a difference the Dees would be if he had a key forward on the park.
Still I would like to see Cloke play at half forward to get himself into the game for al least a quarter otherwise he will never regain form! |
|
|
|
 |
jackcass 
Joined: 01 Mar 2005
Location: Bendigo
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| WarrenerraW wrote: | | I'm all for the team having more goal kickers but Clokey and White just need to lift in general. That's fine if they're not going to pressure the scoreboard if others are more capable but they need to be more attacking in general play by taking more marks and setting up their teammates. Play them up the ground. There's no excuse for them only having 4 possessions and 1 or 2 marks a game. I just want more input from them. |
I agree, would love more input, just think settling our defense and improving our clearance are firstly more critical, and secondly, a major reason for our struggling forwards. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
|
|
The Rules
FAQ
Usergroups
Calendar
Search
Log in
Register
