Reid setback :(
Users browsing this topic:0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 2 Guests
Registered Users: None |
 |
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
RudeBoy
Joined: 28 Nov 2005
|
| Post subject: |  |
|
| Johnno75 wrote: | | Az wrote: | | Larkins is a fool and always assumes thr worst of any injury just to hype up the news. An absolute show pony just like razor ray. Even though Collingwood aren't all that transparent when it comes to injuries, I'm more inclined to believe them rather than that muppet. |
After Buckley said in his Round 1 post match presser that if he had a few extra days Ben Reid (and 1 other player as well can't remember who) would have been right to go, I wont believe anything the club says on injuries until they players are named and are on the park.
Larkins is no fool and to pinch one of Dennis Cometti's sayings would venture to say Larkins will be closer to the mark than the 2-3 weeks Eade came up with. |
In fairness to Eade, I recall him saying at the time that they didn't really know the extent of his injury, but his feeling was that Reid would miss about 3 weeks. |
|
|
|
 |
rand corp
Joined: 06 Feb 2003
Location: south east asia
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| If Reid is two or three weeks away, he will be back round sixteen or seventeen and will then need at least another two or three games in the VFL. So a possible round twenty return looks the most likely scenario. That is only if he has no further setbacks, car crashes or a building doesn't fall on him. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
|
|
The Rules
FAQ
Usergroups
Calendar
Search
Log in
Register
