View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Donny
Formerly known as MAGFAN8.
Joined: 04 Aug 2002 Location: Toonumbar NSW Australia
|
Post subject: Pre Match. Pies v. Blues. All comments please. | |
|
Saturday. MCG. 1.45
Collingwood v. Carlton
Let's hear ya !! _________________ Donny.
It's a game. Enjoy it.
Last edited by Donny on Sat May 11, 2019 2:07 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
|
|
|
What'sinaname
Joined: 29 May 2010 Location: Living rent free
|
Post subject: | |
|
History head-to-head
Wins - 125
Losses - 127
Draw 4
So, we still need to win the next 3 to get in front.
Interesting to note, we are ahead in the head-to-head for H&A games (+4) but behind in finals (-6) _________________ Fighting against the objectification of woman. |
|
|
|
|
swoop42
Whatcha gonna do when he comes for you?
Joined: 02 Aug 2008 Location: The 18
|
Post subject: | |
|
I should have clarified my earlier position more clearly and stated that for a Cox/Reid combination to have any chance of working de Goey would need to fill Adams role in the midfield.
People need to realise that with Cox, Mihocek and de Goey we have essentially been playing with 3 tall forwards this season already akin to the West Coast premiership structure and like our 2010/11 side featuring Cloke, Dawes and Brown.
Because of his ability to impact through the midfield we forget de Goey would make most if not all sides purely as a tall forward option.
We could potentially add a 4th tall in Reid and get away with it against lesser opposition like Carlton but it's doubtful it'll be our standard setup moving forward.
P.S-If heaven forbid de Goey missed a week through injury I'd be happy playing Reid alongside Cox and Mihocek. _________________ He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD! |
|
|
|
|
Clifton Hill-Billy
Joined: 29 Sep 2011 Location: 3068----> 3076
|
Post subject: | |
|
De Goey needs to go to the midfield to avoid his low goal kicking accuracy _________________ "Hey Ma get off the dang roof!" |
|
|
|
|
Rd10.1998_11.1#36
rd10.1998_11.1#36
Joined: 18 Jul 2018 Location: Sevilla, Spain
|
|
|
|
|
RudeBoy
Joined: 28 Nov 2005
|
Post subject: | |
|
I can see your logic swoop, but alternatively De Goey can equally be classified as a 'small' forward, due to his speed and exquisite ground ball skills. Mihocek is really a mid sized forward, meaning that we have really only been playing with one true tall forward all year. Playing Cox and Reid would constitute 2 talls. That's how I see it anyway. |
|
|
|
|
ANNODAM
Rebel Heart Tour - The Forum, Los Angeles 27/10/2015.
Joined: 02 Jul 2007 Location: Eltham, VIC.
|
Post subject: | |
|
Just win! _________________ WE WERE ROBBED, RIGHT IN FRONT OF ME, RIGHT IN FRONT OF MEEE!
N.Y METS, N.Y GIANTS, PENRITH PANTHERS & HOBART HURRICANES FAN.
WE ALL LOOK GOOD AT TRAINING, IT'S THE MATCHES THAT COUNT! |
|
|
|
|
LaurieHolden
Floreat Gymnorhina tyrannica
Joined: 22 Feb 2009 Location: Victoria Park
|
Post subject: | |
|
Key match-up's
Our history vs theirs! One match closer to squaring the w/l ratio.
Drop the clutch from the 1st bounce and smash them.
Cripps vs Pendlebury, delicious.
Aish / Brown onto Walsh.
Maynard onto Petrevski-Seaton
Howe onto Curnow.
Out : Adams (inj), Thomas (omit)
In : Aish, Wells
B: Langdon, Roughead, Howe
HB: Crisp, Moore, Maynard
C: Phillips, Pendlebury, Sidebottom
R: Grundy, Beams, JDG
HF: WHE, Reid, Wells
F: Stephenson, Mihocek, Elliott
Int: Treloar, Brown, Greenwood, Aish
A Pies side with fit Reid and Wells is a better side.
The option of rotating Wells, Pendles and Treloar is a luxury. _________________ "The Club's not Jock, Ted and Gerry" (& Eddie)
2023 AFL Premiers
Last edited by LaurieHolden on Sun May 05, 2019 10:07 am; edited 3 times in total |
|
|
|
|
eddiesmith
Lets get ready to Rumble
Joined: 22 Nov 2004 Location: Lexus Centre
|
Post subject: | |
|
This is truly a game it would be great for a sustained 4 qtr effort and some accuracy in front of goal to finally get a bit of a % boost |
|
|
|
|
Pies2016
Joined: 12 Sep 2014
|
Post subject: | |
|
RudeBoy wrote: | I can see your logic swoop, but alternatively De Goey can equally be classified as a 'small' forward, due to his speed and exquisite ground ball skills. Mihocek is really a mid sized forward, meaning that we have really only been playing with one true tall forward all year. Playing Cox and Reid would constitute 2 talls. That's how I see it anyway. |
I think the best way to look at our front six is to disregard size and look at the pressure they are ( or aren’t ) capable of providing collectively.
If the selection committee think a front six of Cox Reid Miochek DeGoey Elliot and Stephenson is capable of locking the ball in, then that combination becomes workable.
To me, it still looks a bit top heavy, so I would prefer the balance of a smaller crumbing high pressure forward at the expense of one of the talls.
Cox, Miochek Reid and DeGoey ( to a lesser extent ) all do their best work in the air. If the ball does go to ground in our forward line, I would be very nervous of the unpressured rebound coming back the other way.
Interesting times ahead |
|
|
|
|
AN_Inkling
Joined: 06 Oct 2007
|
Post subject: | |
|
swoop42 wrote: | I should have clarified my earlier position more clearly and stated that for a Cox/Reid combination to have any chance of working de Goey would need to fill Adams role in the midfield.
People need to realise that with Cox, Mihocek and de Goey we have essentially been playing with 3 tall forwards this season already akin to the West Coast premiership structure and like our 2010/11 side featuring Cloke, Dawes and Brown.
Because of his ability to impact through the midfield we forget de Goey would make most if not all sides purely as a tall forward option.
We could potentially add a 4th tall in Reid and get away with it against lesser opposition like Carlton but it's doubtful it'll be our standard setup moving forward.
P.S-If heaven forbid de Goey missed a week through injury I'd be happy playing Reid alongside Cox and Mihocek. |
I don't agree in terms of size. Maybe roles, but that can be adjusted.
De Goey is 188cm. If he is a "tall" then we're playing 5 of them when you include WHE (186cm) and Stephenson (189cm).
I consider a player a tall when they have the limitations of a tall. De Goey does not. Mihoceck at 192cm is a borderline medium/tall. He has some mobility but lacks pace and real ground ball winning ability, so I'd call him a tall.
It's possible Mihocek works in a three tall forward line with Reid and Cox, but I'd have massive doubts that is our best or even a good lineup. None of those three are gun AFL players and I'd question why we'd mess with a working lineup to try and fit them in, we have smalls/mediums that are better. Tall players come with clear disadvantages, if your adding extra talls, especially when they aren't very good, you're almost certainly weakening your team. Better to play an extra running player than add a marginal tall.
We might experiment with a Cox/Reid/Mihocehk lineup but I'd be very surprised if we stick with it. At this stage Cox is well ahead of Reid as a ruck/forward and Mihoceck ahead to a slightly lesser degree as a mobile second tall. If Reid makes his way into our best 22 I expect it would be at Mihocek's expense, but don't think it will happen. _________________ Well done boys! |
|
|
|
|
swoop42
Whatcha gonna do when he comes for you?
Joined: 02 Aug 2008 Location: The 18
|
Post subject: | |
|
Ultimately AI we arrive at the same conclusion in terms of 3 "talls" but to me de Goey represents a tall forward in our side because he can compete physically against taller opponents and draws the ball like a full forward.
Size isn't that relevant as his sublime talent coupled with power and mobility means he can play taller and a lot of opponents that can match him for height and strength can't for speed on the lead.
Think Ablett and even Dunstall as comparisons.
While he has a long way to go to ever match their exploits he is one of the best one out against an opponent in the AFL, plays with a presence that worries the opposition and critically in terms of our setup and whether we can play 3 "talls" his teammates will direct a lot of ball to him inside 50 such is their confidence of his ability.
When you already have de Goey, Hoskin-Elliott and Elliott available as capable marking threats, throw in Mihocek adding Reid on top Cox who both really rely on marking for scoreboard impact then the air space is going to get crowded and sacrificing one for more ground ball ability seems preferential for balance.
As for Mihocek going nowhere anytime soon would be guess.
Better output than Cox last season and Reid historically when he played forward and done it in his first season.
His contribution has been outstanding to date and no one saw it coming.
Better runner across the ground and offers an ability that neither Cox or Reid does as a forward and that's being able to regularly create scoring opportunities for himself gathering the ground ball.
Marking not to shabby either and not for the first time this time season I thought he had one of those almost games last night whereby he nearly managed to grasp some difficult marking opportunities. His luck will change and 1/2 goal games will turn into 3/4.
For mine it's a case of Cox or Reid if a decision needs to be made.
Cox the better relief ruck option whose sheer size makes him a difficult forward proposition.
Reid the smarter and more well rounded footballer. _________________ He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD! |
|
|
|
|
Presti35
Dick Lee for Legend Status
Joined: 05 Oct 2001 Location: London, England
|
Post subject: | |
|
Will be glad to put Carlton away and just move on.
Been following the head-to-head for basically my whole life and we always get close and drop one we shouldn't. Each loss = 2 wins to catch up.
I remember sitting there with my brother and adding all the wins and losses up before the internet was a thing.
I remember being like 20 behind. We only play them the one time this year, so make it count. _________________ A Goal Saved Is 2 Goals Earned! |
|
|
|
|
Presti35
Dick Lee for Legend Status
Joined: 05 Oct 2001 Location: London, England
|
Post subject: | |
|
We know they'll be one out; Adams.
I wouldn't bring Cox straight back in if he isnt 110%. I wouldnt be against resting him the extra week to make sure.
Possible ins are;
Aish if hes fit.
Wills after a solid run in the 2s.
Varcoe after a week off.
Unlikely to come in:
Wells who has been ok in the VFL.
Daicos who needs to do more in the VFL.
Sier who is still injured and needs a run in the 2s first.
No VFL game this week, but here's last weeks emergencies: Travis Varcoe, Isaac Quaynor Rupert Wills and Max Lynch. _________________ A Goal Saved Is 2 Goals Earned! |
|
|
|
|
K
Joined: 09 Sep 2011
|
Post subject: | |
|
Presti35 wrote: | ...
I wouldn't bring Cox straight back in if he isnt 110%. I wouldnt be against resting him the extra week to make sure.
... |
There's no indication he's even 90% fit. I wouldn't be surprised if he misses at least one more week out of necessity, not just safety. |
|
|
|
|
|