Pre match. Pies v. Cats - all comments please

Match previews, reviews, reports and discussion.

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
User avatar
Piethagoras' Theorem
Posts: 19603
Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 1:09 pm
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 17 times

Post by Piethagoras' Theorem »

Aside from the obvious, Brown for Keeffe, no change for mine. White's probably the only one who had a real shocker but it wasn't a great night for tall, lead up forwards. Add to that, his 1st game for the Pies and against his old club, he was always going to be a little emotionally charged and probably unsettled.

We've won our last 3 against the Cats and for the 1st time this year I'm confident of a win. I believe we have their measure. Pies by 28!
Formally frankiboy and FrankieGoesToCollingwood.
watt price tully
Posts: 20842
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 1:14 pm

Post by watt price tully »

Corey Enright looks like he will be unavailable this week due to an ankle.

Now just to match up on:

Bartel, Selwood, Christiansen, Hawkins, Taylor, Taylor Hunt, Motlop, MacIntosh, Duncan, Kelly, Stokes & Varcoe then we'll be right. :wink:

If we apply the same or better defensive pressure as we did against the Swans then who knows. Midfield did very well defensively last night pushing back as did the "wings " etc.

Swan looked hampered last night ? groin twinge also did a bit of a shoulder.
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
perthmagpie
Posts: 4373
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 10:11 am
Location: Yarrawonga

Post by perthmagpie »

Don't have to worry about stopping Motlop or Christensen as they are injured. Gotta hold Hawkins, Bartel, Johnson, Selwood and the usual suspects. My changes would be:
In: Keeefe, Fasolo
Out: Langdon, Brown.

Langdon unlucky but we seriously need to add at least one quality finisher to the side and that man is Fasolo. Other options are also bring in Thomas and Kennedy.
Magpies love pies(Lol)
User avatar
Big T
Posts: 10228
Joined: Sat Oct 18, 2003 1:31 am
Location: Torino, Italy
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 82 times

Post by Big T »

Hawkins will be too busy checking out Frosty to get the ball.
Buon Giorno
User avatar
ANNODAM
Posts: 11173
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 11:19 am
Location: Eltham, VIC.
Has liked: 21 times
Been liked: 34 times

Post by ANNODAM »

think positive wrote:
Dave The Man wrote:Well 1 change will be Brown out for Keeffe.

I tip we will win this game as well
Sounds good Dave, that'll do me

Hopefully swan can just get his sore balls rubbed, and will be fine

Cheers



How do you know he has sore testicles, did he tell you or is this some ploy for you to have a bit of a fondle??
WE WERE ROBBED, RIGHT IN FRONT OF ME, RIGHT IN FRONT OF MEEE!

N.Y METS, N.Y GIANTS, PENRITH PANTHERS & HOBART HURRICANES FAN.

WE ALL LOOK GOOD AT TRAINING, IT'S THE MATCHES THAT COUNT!
User avatar
Doc63
Posts: 4558
Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 8:58 pm
Location: Newport

Post by Doc63 »

Big T wrote:Hawkins will be too busy checking out Frosty to get the ball.
Not that there is anything wrong with that (though Frosty might disagree!!).
I hold a cup of wisdom, but there is nothing within.
User avatar
Dave The Man
Posts: 45001
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:04 pm
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 21 times
Contact:

Post by Dave The Man »

Hawkins might Dominate Frost as he is Bigger and Stronger and more a Contested Player then Buddy
I am Da Man
User avatar
Breadcrawl
Posts: 2177
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 11:33 pm

Post by Breadcrawl »

If Hawkins dominates Frost it will happen hours after the game has ended and I don't wanna know about it
they can smell what we're cookin'
Brown26
Posts: 4070
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2001 6:01 pm
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Been liked: 2 times

Post by Brown26 »

Might be useful to have another big forward / ruck in for this game - Witts or Lynch could do the job but not sure if they're up to it. Reid would be perfect.

I reckon Adams needs a full game or a run in the twos. Dwyer will be better for the run, keep him in. Swannie I agree with others, if not fit don't play him. If fit, he should be rotated through the middle where he's most damaging IMO.

We could go with just the one change this week, which would be nice, or try to get one or Fasolo or Kennedy in for probably Langdon (or Adams if he's unlucky, that would just be based on team balance).

We'll have to be cleaner this week than against Sydney to win this one but we're in with a show. If we improve a little every week from now on we're in with a real show.

- Ben
User avatar
RudeBoy
Posts: 22171
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 2:08 pm
Been liked: 148 times

Post by RudeBoy »

Brown26 wrote:Might be useful to have another big forward / ruck in for this game - Witts or Lynch could do the job but not sure if they're up to it. Reid would be perfect.

I reckon Adams needs a full game or a run in the twos. Dwyer will be better for the run, keep him in. Swannie I agree with others, if not fit don't play him. If fit, he should be rotated through the middle where he's most damaging IMO.

We could go with just the one change this week, which would be nice, or try to get one or Fasolo or Kennedy in for probably Langdon (or Adams if he's unlucky, that would just be based on team balance).

We'll have to be cleaner this week than against Sydney to win this one but we're in with a show. If we improve a little every week from now on we're in with a real show.

- Ben
I don't think we can play Grundy, Cloke, White and Witts. It makes us too top heavy. I'd stick with just Cloke and White as the main tall forwards, with Goldsack as the third marking option. Grundy will get beaten most weeks, but he makes a good contest and will improve week by week.

Adams must be played on the ball where he plays best.

I expect Toovey to slowly get better as the season unfolds.

Ins: Keeffe, Kennedy

Outs: Brown (inj), Swan (inj)

I can't wait to include Sharenberg, Freeman, Reid and Fasolo to this team.
User avatar
Jezza
Posts: 29545
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:28 pm
Location: Ponsford End
Has liked: 271 times
Been liked: 354 times

Post by Jezza »

swoop42 wrote:Blair had a better last quarter but had little impact over the first 3.

He wasn't credited with a single tackle so once again I believe his defensive ability is overrated.
I generally agree with you that Blair had an average game and it's very rare to see him not lay a tackle for the whole match but I think you're being harsh on him based on one match he's played and we do have to remember that this was his first match back in the senior side this year.

Blair's tackling pressure should not be underestimated as shown in previous years. Last year he laid a total of 126 tackles which was the 11th highest in the competition and the highest for any player at Collingwood in 2013. Pendles was second with 119 tackles in 2013.

Blair isn't given enough credit for his role. His height disadvantages him slightly but he does have the ability to find the goals and barring his performance last night his defensive pressure is second to none.
🏆 | 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 | 🏆
User avatar
Steve86
Posts: 1111
Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 6:10 pm
Location: perth

Post by Steve86 »

does everyone think grundy got beaten that badly the other night? If he doesn't win the tap he certainly keeps the ball in front of him of tackles the bloke that picks up the ball. He's got such great agility he reminds me of nic nats second efforts sometimes.. and he's only in his first season pretty much. Horizon is brilliant. Id bring in keefe and fasolo.. glad I don't pick who goes out for faz but.
User avatar
Collingwood Crackerjack
Posts: 3567
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 10:11 am
Location: Canberra

Post by Collingwood Crackerjack »

I find it hard to believe Blair didn't register a tackle; my recollection is of him being around the contest a fair bit.

Although I also noticed more pies players keeping their feet around the stoppage area rather than going in for the 2 or 3 on 1 tackle and still having it come loose, so maybe that affected his numbers.
Harrysz
Posts: 1525
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2001 6:01 pm
Location: Melbourne
Been liked: 4 times

Post by Harrysz »

Isn't Ben Sinclair injured?
User avatar
Raw Hammer
Posts: 7353
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:54 pm
Location: The Gutter
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 4 times

Post by Raw Hammer »

Est. 2002
Post Reply