Luke Lowden

All trade and draft talk here thanks..... this means you DTM!!!!

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
Rick
Posts: 1407
Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:48 pm
Been liked: 2 times

Luke Lowden

Post by Rick »

With Mitch Clark choosing the Cats as his preferred club, I wonder if the Pies might try to secure Luke Lowden from the Hawks to fill the ruck/forward position.

It has been reported that he has requested to seek a trade and that the Power were keen until Ryder and Gorringe became available.

Lowden kicked 3 goals on debut (his only game) against the Eagles this season and was a proven goal kicker in the VFL.
User avatar
jackcass
Posts: 12529
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:17 pm
Location: Bendigo

Post by jackcass »

The attraction of Clark was that he could play purely as a KPF and still impact, would have been ahead of Moore, Gault, and probably White in the selection order once he got some form and fitness. Not sure Lowden can or that he offers any more advantage to the team than playing Witts and Grundy. If we do miss on Clark, I'd prefer to see Gault and Moore given opportunities as a 3rd forward.
User avatar
woftam
Posts: 7436
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 12:16 pm
Location: Carum Downs, Vic
Has liked: 1 time

Post by woftam »

jackcass wrote:The attraction of Clark was that he could play purely as a KPF and still impact, would have been ahead of Moore, Gault, and probably White in the selection order once he got some form and fitness. Not sure Lowden can or that he offers any more advantage to the team than playing Witts and Grundy. If we do miss on Clark, I'd prefer to see Gault and Moore given opportunities as a 3rd forward.
I'm not sure using Lowden as a forward would be our intention. We still need another ruck for back up for our 2 young guys. If one has an injury we need a genuine ruck to be able to step in & not use part timers.
User avatar
jackcass
Posts: 12529
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:17 pm
Location: Bendigo

Post by jackcass »

woftam wrote:
jackcass wrote:The attraction of Clark was that he could play purely as a KPF and still impact, would have been ahead of Moore, Gault, and probably White in the selection order once he got some form and fitness. Not sure Lowden can or that he offers any more advantage to the team than playing Witts and Grundy. If we do miss on Clark, I'd prefer to see Gault and Moore given opportunities as a 3rd forward.
I'm not sure using Lowden as a forward would be our intention. We still need another ruck for back up for our 2 young guys. If one has an injury we need a genuine ruck to be able to step in & not use part timers.
OP said to fill the forward/ruck position... recruiting ruck depth a totally different discussion. On that though Lowden would only be leaving the Hawks for greater senior opportunities. He could stay at the Hawks to play VFL and not sure he could climb over Witts or Grundy for senior time.
User avatar
swoop42
Posts: 22049
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 9:27 pm
Location: The 18
Been liked: 8 times

Post by swoop42 »

He'll be 24 at the start of next season so should just be starting to come into his own as a ruckman but whether a 24 year old ruckman with one game of AFL experience offers much more than Witts or Grundy can in the short term is open to debate.

At this stage if both Witts and Grundy went down with injury we'd have no genuine ruck back up but is it worth taking a player purely in case that scenario occurs especially one whose age/experience profile would suggest he mightn't be a better alternative to those named above and could spend a lot of time at VFL level?

I'm not totally against it but it would have to be at the right price.
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD!
User avatar
Dave The Man
Posts: 45001
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:04 pm
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 21 times
Contact:

Post by Dave The Man »

Would be a Good Get and would cost about the Same as Clark.

But without the Depression and Injuries
I am Da Man
User avatar
Podpicken
Posts: 2092
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2006 8:05 pm

Post by Podpicken »

Dave The Man wrote:Would be a Good Get and would cost about the Same as Clark.

But without the Depression and Injuries
I agree Dave. If he works out, he'll be there for a decade, too, not two or three like Clark would have been.
Billy Picken, the great No. 25 in the sky!
User avatar
Big T
Posts: 10228
Joined: Sat Oct 18, 2003 1:31 am
Location: Torino, Italy
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 82 times

Post by Big T »

Yeah, he can't get a game ahead of Ceglar, but he seems ok. Guess we have to settle for that.
Buon Giorno
User avatar
Podpicken
Posts: 2092
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2006 8:05 pm

Post by Podpicken »

for now. Came in and performed very well against Eagles, I like him. And I like him better than Ceglar already.
Billy Picken, the great No. 25 in the sky!
User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34870
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 129 times
Been liked: 178 times

Post by Pies4shaw »

"1:12pm: Wright has also added:

....

- Despite Frawley's signature, key defender Ryan Schoenmakers was committed to staying at the club. Schoenmakers is contracted for 2015. Wright said that there had "not really" been any interest in Schoenmalkers from other clubs, nor had clubs fielded offers for fringe ruckman Luke Lowden."

http://www.canberratimes.com.au/afl/afl ... 3hcra.html
User avatar
Jezza
Posts: 29519
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:28 pm
Location: Ponsford End
Has liked: 256 times
Been liked: 338 times

Post by Jezza »

Ended up going to Adelaide.
🏆 | 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 | 🏆
User avatar
Arch@M32
Posts: 301
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 2:21 pm
Has liked: 155 times
Been liked: 9 times

Post by Arch@M32 »

Podpicken wrote:
Dave The Man wrote:Would be a Good Get and would cost about the Same as Clark.

But without the Depression and Injuries
I agree Dave. If he works out, he'll be there for a decade, too, not two or three like Clark would have been.
I don't think Clarke will last two or three decades.
Post Reply