This is an unofficial Bulletin Board - owned and run by its users. We welcome all fans of the Mighty Collingwood Football Club.
Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
Use this forum for non-Collingwood related footy topics that don't relate specifically to any of the other forums. For non-footy sporting topics please use Nick's Sports Bar and for non-sporting topics please use the Victoria Park Tavern.
Piesnchess wrote:Shame this topic has been relegated here, its very important, and should not have been moved here, not even mentioned on the Discussion page now, very disappointing, really, Mods.
Why? The mods did the right thing to move the topic.
It's got nothing to do with Collingwood in this instance.
But we were involved in the original Do Better Report, we instigated this,more or less, and its taken two yrs for another club to do what we had the guts to do, so in that part, it does indeed involve us , we pioneered this type of report into racism in football.
Poverty exists not because we cannot feed the poor, but because we cannot satisfy the rich.
Chess and Vodka are born brothers. - Russian proverb.
Has Fagan actually re-signed? Or is he just stepping away until the review is over? Geez imagine the Lions were in the GF.
Is it likely Clarkson will re-sign?
If the Roos and Lions all of a sudden need a new coach, that would be insane. (And I reckon the Kangers will look to Hird).
Fagan has stepped aside temporarily while the investigation in undertaken, he hasn't resigned.
Clarkson has delayed his official commencement with North, same thing.
Our Do Better report highlighted what could be termed "casual" racism which is largely unintended and can be rectified with education, which is not to say they weren't bad, but this is another level. These allegations are frankly sickening.
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
So with Clarkson refuting these allegations, does that mean he believes the First Nations players are lying? Why would they? What is their motive? Money? Infamy? I think it's a mistake for him to refute them publicly. He should be "no comment" until they are proven - or not. Has Fagan also said he's innocent & shocked????
maurs64 wrote:So with Clarkson refuting these allegations, does that mean he believes the First Nations players are lying?
No, it means that just one side of the story was heard, and that he wasn't even asked for his side before the report was formulated. A fair enough response in those circumstances. Everyone has a right for their side to be heard when such explosive allegations are made. There are 3 sides to every story....
The pregnancy termination is inexcusable. However, it is normal for football clubs to encourage new recruits to move out of the family home and share house with a more experienced player to help fast track the development of their careers.
I am not convinced that asking the 3 players to move out of their homes was racially motivated.
How would Siri know when to answer "Hey Siri" unless it is listening in to everything you say?
There’s a lot more in the report that hasn’t and won’t be made public that is apparently much worse. Two players attempted suicide because of what happened at the club (the details haven’t been disclosed publicly but are in the report).
It’s possible the abortion comment wasn’t meant literally, but a poor attempt at a joke (similar to how we tell players to get the snip or lock their missus up with a chastity belt around December so theyre not having babies during finals). Clarkson’s an angry little man and it’s hard to know when he’s joking or serious. But I doubt it going by the reactions of the players involved. Even if it was half a joke it’s still offensive. No apology was made at the time. Cyril quit in 2018 and it was always suspected there was more to it.
Yeah put it all down people, make your judgement now, why wait! What happened to the presumption of innocence? "It used to be fashion amongst men that when a charge was made, proof was brought forward to establish it, and if no proof was found to exist, the charge was dropped." A. Lincoln 15/9/1858
Not now, we have the media interview Eddie Betts today, when did he play for Hawthorn? Anything he "knows" is hearsay!
There maybe a case to answer, but it is a ruling of court which confirms that the prosecution's case against an accused person is not baseless.
In the end, it's not going to matter how many breaths you took, but how many moments took your breath away
Have you read the report? There’s a lot more that hasn’t been made public. From the shocked reactions of those who have, it ain’t pretty.
Hawthorn could have been proactive when Collingwood was getting torched, just straight up admitted they made mistakes too and want to do better. But they kept their mouths shut. It’s the players who were affected, two of whom attempted suicide, who forced Hawthorn to do their review. Collingwood’s Do Better was a lesson for all clubs, all AFL, but other clubs thought they wouldn’t have to look in the mirror. Well here we are. Again.
Mr Miyagi wrote:Have you read the report? There’s a lot more that hasn’t been made public. From the shocked reactions of those who have, it ain’t pretty.
Hawthorn could have been proactive when Collingwood was getting torched, just straight up admitted they made mistakes too and want to do better. But they kept their mouths shut. It’s the players who were affected, two of whom attempted suicide, who forced Hawthorn to do their review. Collingwood’s Do Better was a lesson for all clubs, all AFL, but other clubs thought they wouldn’t have to look in the mirror. Well here we are. Again.
Yes I have read what is available, but the point remains the presumption of innocence is one of the most important tenents of the law, write me a story and cry me a river. It may well all be true, but assumptions made of a one sided story are not how it's supposed to work, Collingwood interviewed everyone, the accusers and the accused, apparently not in this case.
In the end, it's not going to matter how many breaths you took, but how many moments took your breath away