AFL wants power to force player trades

Use this forum for non-Collingwood related footy topics that don't relate specifically to any of the other forums. For non-footy sporting topics please use Nick's Sports Bar and for non-sporting topics please use the Victoria Park Tavern.

Moderator: bbmods

Mr Miyagi
Posts: 7606
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2018 3:55 pm
Has liked: 48 times
Been liked: 113 times

AFL wants power to force player trades

Post by Mr Miyagi »

Well.

“The AFL’s superstars would be traded against their will NBA-style under a radical proposal raised by the league as part of its pay talks with the AFL Players’ Association.

And the league has for the first time officially asked the AFLPA to consider a mid-season trade period under the next collective bargaining agreement to help increase player movement across clubs.”

From The Australian: https://www.theaustralian.com.au/sport/ ... 2d44a64bbd
lazzadesilva
Posts: 2206
Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2003 7:01 pm
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 51 times

Post by lazzadesilva »

What about the restraint of trade laws? Wouldn’t that come into effect at times? If this is still about the so called club equalisation process allowing for sanctioned poaching and corruption, then this totally organised shit and active and purposefully shaping of clubs would have gone too far for most of us I reckon
I term the current Collingwood attack based strategy “Unceasing Waves” like on a stormy and windy day with rough seas. A Perfect Storm ☔️
What'sinaname
Posts: 20035
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 10:00 pm
Location: Living rent free
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 9 times

Post by What'sinaname »

Excellent. At the moment, the players seem to have all the power - demanding where they want to be traded and it's an exception to see a player not traded to the club they want.

Now the club can move a player on to the highest bidder.
Fighting against the objectification of woman.
Mr Miyagi
Posts: 7606
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2018 3:55 pm
Has liked: 48 times
Been liked: 113 times

Post by Mr Miyagi »

What'sinaname wrote:Excellent. At the moment, the players seem to have all the power - demanding where they want to be traded and it's an exception to see a player not traded to the club they want.

Now the club can move a player on to the highest bidder.
I made a $50 bet you’d agree with the AFL, thanks mate.
What'sinaname
Posts: 20035
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 10:00 pm
Location: Living rent free
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 9 times

Post by What'sinaname »

Mr Miyagi wrote:
What'sinaname wrote:Excellent. At the moment, the players seem to have all the power - demanding where they want to be traded and it's an exception to see a player not traded to the club they want.

Now the club can move a player on to the highest bidder.
I made a $50 bet you’d agree with the AFL, thanks mate.
Betting with yourself isn't really a bet. You know that right?

Anyway, every other decision the AFL has made to enhance player mobility (following US sports) has made the game better.
Fighting against the objectification of woman.
lazzadesilva
Posts: 2206
Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2003 7:01 pm
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 51 times

Post by lazzadesilva »

What'sinaname wrote:Excellent. At the moment, the players seem to have all the power - demanding where they want to be traded and it's an exception to see a player not traded to the club they want.

Now the club can move a player on to the highest bidder.
Fair enough opinion from you but would you like to comment on the points I made for the sake of a discussion dude?
I term the current Collingwood attack based strategy “Unceasing Waves” like on a stormy and windy day with rough seas. A Perfect Storm ☔️
What'sinaname
Posts: 20035
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 10:00 pm
Location: Living rent free
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 9 times

Post by What'sinaname »

lazzadesilva wrote:
What'sinaname wrote:Excellent. At the moment, the players seem to have all the power - demanding where they want to be traded and it's an exception to see a player not traded to the club they want.

Now the club can move a player on to the highest bidder.
Fair enough opinion from you but would you like to comment on the points I made for the sake of a discussion dude?
What exactly is being restrained? How is a club trading a player to a team different to a team drafting a player?
Fighting against the objectification of woman.
Mr Miyagi
Posts: 7606
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2018 3:55 pm
Has liked: 48 times
Been liked: 113 times

Post by Mr Miyagi »

What'sinaname
Posts: 20035
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 10:00 pm
Location: Living rent free
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 9 times

Post by What'sinaname »

I was just waiting for the conspiracy theory to emerge.
Fighting against the objectification of woman.
Mr Miyagi
Posts: 7606
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2018 3:55 pm
Has liked: 48 times
Been liked: 113 times

Post by Mr Miyagi »

The only conspiracy theory here is who you really barrack for. ;)

Maybe read the details. What could possibly go wrong. Or are you happy with the Treloar and Grundy trades?

‘It’s ridiculous’: AFL players reject trading without consent
Paul Marsh.
A club push to allow contracted footballers to be traded against their will has met with fierce resistance from players as their union negotiates a new collective bargaining agreement with the league.

https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/afl ... 5d2xd.html
User avatar
MagpiesTheGreat
Posts: 774
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2014 8:56 am

Post by MagpiesTheGreat »

And in return, we the fans want to power to sack AFL's admin staff including CEO and the board
User avatar
eddiesmith
Posts: 12383
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 11:21 pm
Location: Lexus Centre
Has liked: 8 times
Been liked: 16 times

Post by eddiesmith »

User avatar
dalyc
Posts: 2881
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 7:58 pm
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 12 times

Post by dalyc »

Will never happen.
Four legged animals good, two legged animals better
User avatar
Rd10.1998_11.1#36
Posts: 2539
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2018 7:04 pm
Location: Sevilla, Spain
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 5 times

Post by Rd10.1998_11.1#36 »

Players won’t like it but never is a long time
eddiesmith wrote: I don’t think it’s the AFL per se who are trading players against their will, it’s the clubs.
Exactly

So is everyone still up in arms against it now?
lazzadesilva
Posts: 2206
Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2003 7:01 pm
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 51 times

Post by lazzadesilva »

What'sinaname wrote:I was just waiting for the conspiracy theory to emerge.
I don’t think there is a conspiracy, just that I could see the club’s hand being forced at times to do the AFL’s bidding, depending on which player at which club the AFL want. Nothing is ever cut and dry with the AFL. They will have wriggle room until the process is clear and then set it in concrete.
I term the current Collingwood attack based strategy “Unceasing Waves” like on a stormy and windy day with rough seas. A Perfect Storm ☔️
Post Reply