Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2014 8:57 pm
What the actual ****
This is an unofficial Bulletin Board - owned and run by its users. We welcome all fans of the Mighty Collingwood Football Club.
https://magpies.net/
In what universe do you think Adelaide would accept a straight swap of Aish for Danger? To add to that, you realise Aish needs to agree to go to Adelaide of all places first. Simply not going to happen. Only way it could was if pick 4 was thrown in.dillo_09 wrote:No Way!!thebaldfacts wrote:On Big Footy they suggested -
Beams to Brisbane
Dangerfield to pies
Pick 4 + Aish to Adelaide.
Happy with that if it is a straight swap for Dangerfield.
If thats on the Table, Take aish and 4 from Brisbane and ontrade Aish to Adelaide for Danger & their 2nd rd pick. Win - Win - Win
I am disappointed, but he will NEVER have greater currency than he has right now!!! So that means we need to maximize it and get the best deal that the AFL has EVER seen
Omeara and Pick 7 and 2nd round pick
Aish and Pick 4 and 2nd round pick
Bare minimum!!
haha no issue mate, i don't think you were as offhand as others. my point was more to those who just said "deleted the thread because it won't happen".Damien wrote:Credit where it's due mate. Your mail was obviously on the money. My apologies. Now let's get the best possible trade.derkd wrote:The big Beams thread...that was started and i was told by some i was "talking rubbish" about him going......apologies??? lol
They can throw all the unfair trades out in the wind that they want, they know it's not going to fly. Beams is one of the best footballers in the league, Ryder is just one of the best ruckman. Of course it's in their best interest to say they'll offer pick. 4 for Dayne, but there's absolutely zero chance we're accepting anything less than what WE want for him. If they do, they can kiss my membership and a lot more goodbye.derkd wrote:haha no issue mate, i don't think you were as offhand as others. my point was more to those who just said "deleted the thread because it won't happen".Damien wrote:Credit where it's due mate. Your mail was obviously on the money. My apologies. Now let's get the best possible trade.derkd wrote:The big Beams thread...that was started and i was told by some i was "talking rubbish" about him going......apologies??? lol
To be honest, i think it is best that found out now that he does want to go home on compasonate grounds..... and i think he deserves respect for that.
Trade wise, well, we need to be weary of Brisbane..... as we have seen with the Ryder case where they are offering Pick.24 (well under value, because they feel they can get away with it). So we need to make sure we hold them to account.
Az wrote:They can throw all the unfair trades out in the wind that they want, they know it's not going to fly. Beams is one of the best footballers in the league, Ryder is just one of the best ruckman. Of course it's in their best interest to say they'll offer pick. 4 for Dayne, but there's absolutely zero chance we're accepting anything less than what WE want for him. If they do, they can kiss my membership and a lot more goodbye.derkd wrote:haha no issue mate, i don't think you were as offhand as others. my point was more to those who just said "deleted the thread because it won't happen".Damien wrote: Credit where it's due mate. Your mail was obviously on the money. My apologies. Now let's get the best possible trade.
To be honest, i think it is best that found out now that he does want to go home on compasonate grounds..... and i think he deserves respect for that.
Trade wise, well, we need to be weary of Brisbane..... as we have seen with the Ryder case where they are offering Pick.24 (well under value, because they feel they can get away with it). So we need to make sure we hold them to account.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABucks2014 wrote:Surely we are due for some luck to come our way...
+1Culprit wrote:Fckn Family reason my fat *rse. It's the standard bulltish excuse run by player managers.
Oh ffs INK I know you've never liked him but this is getting beyond a joke now.AN_Inkling wrote:^^Absolutely, talent wise he's a big loss. But as a rather slow, rather short and more inside than outside player he's not a type that we are absolutely desperate for. We can use the deal to bring some of those in.
Pretty sure he's a restricted free agent next season isn't he?Deja Vu wrote:Free agent at end of 2016