Page 3 of 3
Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2004 11:59 am
by Johnson#26
If we knew Davidson would fire, then we'd do it. But he is still unknown.
Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2004 2:54 pm
by PiesFan
When we look at it in face value, Chris Judd is more value then Taz. But if we were to lose Taz for Judd, i do not think that we would be a better team.
Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2004 8:47 am
by Johnson#26
Exactly PiesFan. If we did it, we would lack in fire power. It is a no-no.
Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2004 11:45 pm
by daics'mate
it's only theory ok as Eagles would never agree and Judd will stay, but Taz off the field is a disaster- not just 5 years ago he pissed off to Mildura- did it again when he was injured this year. he leads other young players astray. Davidson is a example- - he is already on charges- bad personal style- I am not looking for a saint - which is just as well- but excesive off field behaviour is too much in some cases. Tazza has great style -but does not get enough goals - now is the time or next year - but we do need to think about a replacement for Bucks which is why MM wants Judd.