Page 3 of 66

Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2007 6:00 am
by nulla
Didaksrightfoot

what I should have said was stature wise he looked superfit. As though he had put more effort into sculpting his body

Re: Ben Cousins

Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:57 pm
by Dave The Man
melliot wrote:SEN suggested a romour going around that he may be up for trade.

Intrested?

I'd say no! unless cheap as ....................... ice! :)
Stuff it we just get him in the Draft :wink:

NO COUSINS FOR COLLINGWOOD!

Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:20 pm
by Did-I?
I don't know if I'm the only one (please let me know) who is disturbed to hear that that smeghead from the west is going join our mighty pies! I don't want him, he is nothing but bad news to the people he's around, and with did's and shawry already up to no good, it would be like throwing a couple of 2 year olds another piece of chocolate!

We have shown we have the depth in our side to overcome some of the largest obsticles, even without our top guns in there.

I SAY NO TO COUSINS!!!!

Who is with me????

Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:22 pm
by John Wren
nope, not with you but thanks for asking.

Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:22 pm
by jack_spain
I say leave all trade talk until our season is done and dusted.

We have a premiership to pinch here! :wink:

Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:27 pm
by skaman
Nope, no dice.

I'm all for Cuz coming to Pieland to play the footy we know he can, and to fill the role of a premiership centreman. Thats his trade, thats what we want/ need him for, nothing else. DO IT Pies! (while youre at it ...get Kerr too!!)

Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:28 pm
by Piethagoras' Theorem
that's ok, as long as we get soup :)

Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:30 pm
by John Wren
frankiboy wrote:that's ok, as long as we get soup :)
no soup for you!

Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 10:08 pm
by Nutmeg
Vote 1 Cuz for pies
Vote 2 Kerr for pies

Re: NO COUSINS FOR COLLINGWOOD!

Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 10:55 pm
by Dave The Man
Did-I? wrote:I don't know if I'm the only one (please let me know) who is disturbed to hear that that smeghead from the west is going join our mighty pies! I don't want him, he is nothing but bad news to the people he's around, and with did's and shawry already up to no good, it would be like throwing a couple of 2 year olds another piece of chocolate!

We have shown we have the depth in our side to overcome some of the largest obsticles, even without our top guns in there.

I SAY NO TO COUSINS!!!!

Who is with me????
Do you want to the team to be better?

I would love Cousins he is a Kind of Player at 100% can win us games of footy where we would normally Lose

Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 1:49 am
by medders#7
I want Cousins SO BAD!!!!!

probably almost as bad as i wanted judd last year

he could win us a premiership
imagine a pies premiership everyone would envy us and hate us!!!!!!!

love it
come to us Cuz

Re: NO COUSINS FOR COLLINGWOOD!

Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 11:19 am
by Alec. J. Hidell
Did-I? wrote:I don't know if I'm the only one (please let me know) who is disturbed to hear that that smeghead from the west is going join our mighty pies! I don't want him, he is nothing but bad news to the people he's around, and with did's and shawry already up to no good, it would be like throwing a couple of 2 year olds another piece of chocolate!

We have shown we have the depth in our side to overcome some of the largest obsticles, even without our top guns in there.

I SAY NO TO COUSINS!!!!

Who is with me????
So you think we should trade Didak and Shaw then?

Re: NO COUSINS FOR COLLINGWOOD!

Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 3:50 pm
by themonk
Did-I? wrote:I don't know if I'm the only one (please let me know) who is disturbed to hear that that smeghead from the west is going join our mighty pies! I don't want him, he is nothing but bad news to the people he's around, and with did's and shawry already up to no good, it would be like throwing a couple of 2 year olds another piece of chocolate!

We have shown we have the depth in our side to overcome some of the largest obsticles, even without our top guns in there.

I SAY NO TO COUSINS!!!!

Who is with me????
Sorry, not with you on this one.

Bad boys need to be managed properly and they will deliver, i.e. Millane, Banks, McGuane

Re: NO COUSINS FOR COLLINGWOOD!

Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 4:30 pm
by Dale61
Did-I? wrote:I don't know if I'm the only one (please let me know) who is disturbed
On this subject matter, then yes, you are!

Re: NO COUSINS FOR COLLINGWOOD!

Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 9:10 pm
by dids_04
Did-I? wrote:I don't know if I'm the only one (please let me know) who is disturbed to hear that that smeghead from the west is going join our mighty pies! I don't want him, he is nothing but bad news to the people he's around, and with did's and shawry already up to no good, it would be like throwing a couple of 2 year olds another piece of chocolate!

We have shown we have the depth in our side to overcome some of the largest obsticles, even without our top guns in there.

I SAY NO TO COUSINS!!!!

Who is with me????
why do you give a shit what they do off-field? So long as Cousins (and Kerr too!) play like the gut-running premiership midfielders they are, it will enhance our side immensly and we could seriously challenge the likes of Geelong.

The midfield is arguably the most important aspect of winning premierships, the majority of premiership teams have gun midfields. We, currently, simply do not. We either have young guns still far too raw or lokes the game has simply passed. No one in between. The in between are Cousins and Kerr. They are available. Going hard for both of them is a no brainer, we already have plenty of kids with potential.....