god if thats the case...i would've more than gladly handed over the 2nd rounder.optimax wrote:we offered said third rounder and laidley said a second rounder please, so we moved on.Cam wrote:I think we will only be adding kids now.
Surely that third rounder could have been spent on Harris. But what would I know.
When O'Bree rotates to the bench, we are going to get smashed in the extraction side of the game, week in, week out.
Ben Cousins - He's back (now at Richmond) [Merged Threads]
Moderator: bbmods
- DaVe86
- Posts: 13731
- Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 7:04 pm
- Location: Melbourne
There's more to life than footy.........just not much more.
- daicos from the boundry
- Posts: 715
- Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2006 11:18 pm
- Location: 6ft under
In hindsight fair enough.daicos from the boundry wrote:Liam Pickering who is Daniel Harris's manager stated on SEN this morning that Collingwood offered a 3rd rounder for Harris and it was knocked back as they wanted a 2nd rounder. Rightly so by the Kangas too.
One more to be delisted if they are going to pick up Benny in the PSD.
I wanted us to get Harris, but our 2nd round pick (29) was higher than his value dictated. I reckon Harris would be disappointed North didn't do the deal seeing he asked to leave.
- Dave The Man
- Posts: 45001
- Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:04 pm
- Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
- Has liked: 2 times
- Been liked: 21 times
- Contact:
Helped that Harris was in Contract for North because that would of Been our Bargaining Tool for Us,daicos from the boundry wrote:Liam Pickering who is Daniel Harris's manager stated on SEN this morning that Collingwood offered a 3rd rounder for Harris and it was knocked back as they wanted a 2nd rounder. Rightly so by the Kangas too.
One more to be delisted if they are going to pick up Benny in the PSD.
Not Surprised we did not Offer both out 3rd Rounds pick after the Shaw trade for Harris
I am Da Man
- stui magpie
- Posts: 54843
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
- Location: In flagrante delicto
- Has liked: 132 times
- Been liked: 168 times
Look, if we get Cousins, and he actually manages to play at somewhere near the level he was playing at 2 years ago, total bonus. If not.......meh.
If we pin our hopes of salvation on a 30 year old drug addict who's been out of the game for 18 months, we've underselling the group we already have.
A fit and firing cousins would be nice, but not the messiah.
If we pin our hopes of salvation on a 30 year old drug addict who's been out of the game for 18 months, we've underselling the group we already have.
A fit and firing cousins would be nice, but not the messiah.
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
- leonmagic
- Posts: 3430
- Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 7:24 pm
who cares if stk want him, don't we have a PSD pick before them? if so, we'll get him (assuming we want him). if we don't want him, then there's a reason. either way i'm not fussed.
as stui said, if we're expecting him to big 'the difference', then we're way off. he may well have a brilliant year, but it's unlikely. if he can average 15 touches a game with the odd 30 touch game then we'll have done very very well.
as stui said, if we're expecting him to big 'the difference', then we're way off. he may well have a brilliant year, but it's unlikely. if he can average 15 touches a game with the odd 30 touch game then we'll have done very very well.
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2008 10:25 am
- Alec. J. Hidell
- Posts: 4628
- Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 4:13 pm
What are you talking about!!!soriaa wrote:i think your on the money podpicken ..its starting to remind me like the judd situation, carlton got in 1st then we spoke 2 him and all the talk was we would get him but blues got it and i think were like the carlton last year and we have gone a bit quit.
Judd set and controlled his entire agenda from the very beginning, the clubs were basically reduced to bit players
The one man in the world, who never believes he is mad, is the madman.
-
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 8:52 pm
- Location: Mooroolbark, Victoria
- Contact:
I don't think anyone's posted this, so I'll put it up here, seeing as it's pretty relevant to the Cousins discussion:
A SINGLE DRUG CHEAT CAN NOW COST YOUR TEAM THE GRAND FINAL
Aaaaand...
A SINGLE DRUG CHEAT CAN NOW COST YOUR TEAM THE GRAND FINAL
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/st ... 70,00.htmlDemetriou revealed that if only one player tested positive to performance-enhancing drugs on match day then the commission also had absolute power to act. That could include reversing the decision of a grand final.
Aaaaand...
I guess it depends on whether Collingwood is totally convinced that Ben is completely over his addiction, because if he isn't - I don't want him risking the result of a grand final. This view supported that he's probably going to be targeted each week, including hair testing, and also that he's previously stated that he can't guarantee that he can control his addiction.The revelation that the commission could invoke its absolute power should a player test positive on match day might temper the enthusiasm of clubs like St Kilda, Brisbane and Collingwood who have shown interest in drafting Cousins.
"Really gives a feeling for the scope and tragedy of the thing, doesn't it?"