Page 33 of 66

Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 10:31 am
by Alec. J. Hidell
Raw Hammer wrote:Mick only wants good human beings in his team.

Even his quote re: the Australian IR team was hilarious, something like ... "Not only are they talented footballers, they are also good citizens."

Good citizens? Who gives a f*ck?
No, no, no.
You've got this all wrong.

This is NOT about what YOU want.
Its about the direction of our great club.

The fact that you would gladly employee anyone regardless of who or what they are, says more about your morals than it does about our club.

Because your standards are, as you say, in the 'gutter', don't assume everyone else's are

Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 10:32 am
by Arges Tuft
Alec. J. Hidell wrote: I should thank you
It was your lead that caused me to inquire
And here i was thinking you were ignoring me.

:wink:

Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 10:32 am
by Alec. J. Hidell
Arges Tuft wrote:
Alec. J. Hidell wrote: I should thank you
It was your lead that caused me to inquire
And here i was thinking you were ignoring me.

:wink:
No my friend, just being cautious

Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 10:37 am
by Fire Up
what i reckon has happened and therefore the pies have given up on cousins is.

the pies had a PI to follow cousins for a while (think it was a week or so) the pi then got back to the pies MUST of said something like he/she doesn't like what they saw in cousins as in could be doing his old stuff etc.

ALSO how come christine nixon (chief commonisher of vic police) is getting mentioned now coz pies have decided to give up on cousins from advice or words from here :?

Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 10:43 am
by Raw Hammer
Alec. J. Hidell wrote:
Raw Hammer wrote:Mick only wants good human beings in his team.

Even his quote re: the Australian IR team was hilarious, something like ... "Not only are they talented footballers, they are also good citizens."

Good citizens? Who gives a f*ck?
No, no, no.
You've got this all wrong.

This is NOT about what YOU want.
Its about the direction of our great club.

The fact that you would gladly employee anyone regardless of who or what they are, says more about your morals than it does about our club.

Because your standards are, as you say, in the 'gutter', don't assume everyone else's are
I am a member, attend all games, and want to see a premiership. I have no other 'moral' attachment to the club.

Steve Johnson - social idiot, drink driver - Premiership player
Buddy Franklin - social d!ckhead and other alleged incidents - Premiership player
Fevola - all round d!ckhead - 99 goal kicker, in an upcoming team led by Judd

These genuine match-winners would not be considered by Mick because they are not good human beings.

Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 10:44 am
by Alec. J. Hidell
Fire Up wrote:what i reckon has happened and therefore the pies have given up on cousins is.

the pies had a PI to follow cousins for a while (think it was a week or so) the pi then got back to the pies MUST of said something like he/she doesn't like what they saw in cousins as in could be doing his old stuff etc.

ALSO how come christine nixon (chief commonisher of vic police) is getting mentioned now coz pies have decided to give up on cousins from advice or words from here :?
Not sure I understand what you are saying.

I assume you agree with checking out Cousins in Perth, but don't agree with checking out Cousins via Nixon? (not that I think that happened).
If that's what you are saying, it doesn't make sense

Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 10:45 am
by Alec. J. Hidell
Raw Hammer wrote:
Alec. J. Hidell wrote:
Raw Hammer wrote:Mick only wants good human beings in his team.

Even his quote re: the Australian IR team was hilarious, something like ... "Not only are they talented footballers, they are also good citizens."

Good citizens? Who gives a f*ck?
No, no, no.
You've got this all wrong.

This is NOT about what YOU want.
Its about the direction of our great club.

The fact that you would gladly employee anyone regardless of who or what they are, says more about your morals than it does about our club.

Because your standards are, as you say, in the 'gutter', don't assume everyone else's are
I am a member, attend all games, and want to see a premiership. I have no other 'moral' attachment to the club.

Steve Johnson - social idiot, drink driver - Premiership player
Buddy Franklin - social d!ckhead and other alleged incidents - Premiership player
Fevola - all round d!ckhead - 99 goal kicker, in an upcoming team led by Judd

These genuine match-winners would not be considered by Mick because they are not good human beings.
Wow!!! You're a member and attend all games!!!

So my original reply to you stands then?

Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 10:46 am
by GreekLunatic
Nah Mick might consider them cause they aint 30 yet.

Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 10:47 am
by Raw Hammer
So they can be bad citizens, as long as they are young?
Fair enough.

Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 10:49 am
by Fire Up
nixon's name has been brought up about cousins. because she has spoken to the pies about him. since then we have decided to give up on cousins. so she must of said something to us to not want to get cousins.

also cousins manager (ricky nixon) wants her to make public what she said

Re: WOOOHOOOO!

Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 10:54 am
by Pricey_1981
accountabilityPlease wrote:Thank fu%k for that.

Now I can still go to the footy. I was prepared to cancel my membership if we picked that junkie.

C E L E B R A T I O N!

I look forward to seeing Shaz Wellingham fit again and firing in the midfield. We don't need ancient junkies who can't guarantee he can even play, let alone well and for how long? A year, two at best?

Congratulations to Bucks for having the sense - and balls - to say we shouldn't pick him on football grounds alone!

GO PIES!
in all seriousness pull ur head in

Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 10:54 am
by Alec. J. Hidell
Not necessarily

The Herald-Sun sometimes plays with the facts to give the impression something occurred when in fact it may never have occurred.

Re: WOOOHOOOO!

Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 10:59 am
by MACDAICOS
Pricey_1981 wrote:
accountabilityPlease wrote:Thank fu%k for that.

Now I can still go to the footy. I was prepared to cancel my membership if we picked that junkie.

C E L E B R A T I O N!

I look forward to seeing Shaz Wellingham fit again and firing in the midfield. We don't need ancient junkies who can't guarantee he can even play, let alone well and for how long? A year, two at best?

Congratulations to Bucks for having the sense - and balls - to say we shouldn't pick him on football grounds alone!

GO PIES!
in all seriousness pull ur head in
Change your avatar ham head!!

Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 11:09 am
by Northern Pie
I would have liked to have seen how he would have gone for us after coming back from all the troubles in his life but am not too upset he is not coming our way....I still think a lot of people ar overlooking how well our young list did this season, so the room for improvement after a solid pre-season is huge....I am looking forward to the 2009 season...

Cheers

Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 11:14 am
by Dave The Man
Well We Will Look Smart or Stupid after Next Season about this Descion and There is no In-Between