Page 42 of 94

Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2015 8:36 pm
by Dave The Man
Matt needs to watch this Video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BGCotaZPHVM

Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2015 8:46 pm
by qldmagpie67
Well if he's gone he's gone the deal is easy really
Scharenberg to the Crows
Dangerfield, Sloane, Walker, Betts & Jacobs to the pies plus Crows first rd picks for next 4yrs
Get it done Eddie
:D

Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2015 8:51 pm
by Didaksgoal
qldmagpie67 wrote:Well if he's gone he's gone the deal is easy really
Scharenberg to the Crows
Dangerfield, Sloane, Walker, Betts & Jacobs to the pies plus Crows first rd picks for next 4yrs
Get it done Eddie
:D
Sounds fair. I can't see anything wrong with that! :D We'll give them Scott Burns as coach as the tickler in the deal.

Go the Pies!

Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2015 8:59 pm
by swoop42
AN_Inkling wrote:
swoop42 wrote:It might come back to bite me on the arse but it's time to stop sitting on the fence.

He's gone in my opinion.

I've always had my suspicions once he started talking about putting off contract talks till the end of the year as it's a common story we've seen time and again from players who inevitably end up leaving.

In Scharenbergs case it's even more peculiar given his injury history with most players in similar circumstances being just content to be re-signed.
So where's Freeman going then? Exactly the same situation.

I don't know if he's going or staying and don't see the fascination in being the first to call him gone (Rudeboy seems to like going very hard and early on this :D). When the news is out (no not tonight's non-news) I'll think about it, until then he's a Collingwood player.
Not the same situation at all.

Freeman is Victorian.

He wasn't hyped pre draft as the best schoolboy footballer since Carey.

Scharenberg has a younger brother coming through the ranks at the elite junior level. If he leaves clubs outside of Adelaide would be reluctant to draft his younger brother as well.

Freeman hasn't been subjected to media attention regarding his contract status and hasn't responded by saying he'll put contract talks on hold till the end of the year.

Importantly unlike Scharenberg it hasn't been reported Collingwood has been trying to re-sign Freeman with him unwilling to do so.

I guess it's just assumed by all he will.

Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2015 8:59 pm
by Bruce Gonsalves
After 35 pages, I'm not going through previous posts, but, is it possible or even a fair deal that Shazza to Adelade, Danger to Geelong and Motlop to the Pies?

Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2015 9:04 pm
by watt price tully
Bruce Gonsalves wrote:After 35 pages, I'm not going through previous posts, but, is it possible or even a fair deal that Shazza to Adelade, Danger to Geelong and Motlop to the Pies?
Sold.

I'm a "True Believer"

Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2015 9:07 pm
by swoop42
Fair for us.

Not for Adelaide.

Okay for Geelong.


Dangerfield>Motlop>Scharenberg

Scharenberg, Geelong 1st rounder to Adelaide.

Dangerfield, Collingwood 3rd rounder to Geelong.

Motlop to Collingwood.

Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2015 9:14 pm
by Bruce Gonsalves
Danger can go anywhere I believe for sfa, so it's never going to be fair for Adelaide.

Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2015 9:19 pm
by John Wren
no he can't. rfa. adelaide have every right to match or exceed the offer.

Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2015 9:21 pm
by Pebbles Rocks
swoop42 wrote:Fair for us.

Not for Adelaide.

Okay for Geelong.


Dangerfield>Motlop>Scharenberg

Scharenberg, Geelong 1st rounder to Adelaide.

Dangerfield, Collingwood 3rd rounder to Geelong.

Motlop to Collingwood.
Dangerfield is a free agent. Cats don't have to trade for him

Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2015 9:28 pm
by Dave The Man
Dangerfield will not be part of the Schranberg Possible Trade

Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2015 9:33 pm
by RudeBoy
Pebbles Rocks wrote:
swoop42 wrote:Fair for us.

Not for Adelaide.

Okay for Geelong.


Dangerfield>Motlop>Scharenberg

Scharenberg, Geelong 1st rounder to Adelaide.

Dangerfield, Collingwood 3rd rounder to Geelong.

Motlop to Collingwood.
Dangerfield is a free agent. Cats don't have to trade for him
Dangerfield is not a free agent, he's a limited free agent or something like that.

Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2015 9:40 pm
by Pebbles Rocks
RudeBoy wrote:
Pebbles Rocks wrote:
swoop42 wrote:Fair for us.

Not for Adelaide.

Okay for Geelong.


Dangerfield>Motlop>Scharenberg

Scharenberg, Geelong 1st rounder to Adelaide.

Dangerfield, Collingwood 3rd rounder to Geelong.

Motlop to Collingwood.
Dangerfield is a free agent. Cats don't have to trade for him
Dangerfield is not a free agent, he's a limited free agent or something like that.
That only means Adelaide can match the $$$ offered. I am still right.

Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2015 10:14 pm
by mosig
36 pages in it is 100% clear to me that he might go but there is also a possibility that he will stay. Potentially involving trades and or draft picks.

Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2015 10:15 pm
by swoop42
Pebbles Rocks wrote:
RudeBoy wrote:
Pebbles Rocks wrote: Dangerfield is a free agent. Cats don't have to trade for him
Dangerfield is not a free agent, he's a limited free agent or something like that.
That only means Adelaide can match the $$$ offered. I am still right.
Geelong will have to trade for Dangerfield if Adelaide force there hand and match any offer.

Could happen, may not.