#17,#11 Dayne Beams

Player President threads here thanks.

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
User avatar
jackcass
Posts: 12529
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:17 pm
Location: Bendigo

Post by jackcass »

Lazza wrote:
jackcass wrote:
King Monkey wrote:If I happened to put Lazza, Defender, 35forever (and a few others) on ignore, does this thread revert to about 10 odd pages minus the monotonous petty squabbling???? :roll: :roll:

Change name from Nicks BB, to "perceptive fellow" vs Sunshine & Lollipops BB.
Fkn over this shit..........
Arguing and disagreeing is natural - but the same fkn argument on every fkn thread???????!!!!!!!!!!!!

At one time I found Jacks Pain slightly amusing - as Collie Dog he's gotten worse and is just downright taking the piss out of this place now.

And sorry 1061.
I take back the Clocking Device accusation, obviously it's actually Daffy Duck.
Tempting isn't it. Mood seems to have lightened the last week or so, so maybe worth persevering.
You can put me on ignore any time Daz.

I'll just come up and tell you the same stuff when we meet anyway.... :twisted: :lol: 8)
Thanks Laz but your permission wasn't a requirement :wink:
User avatar
Lazza
Posts: 12836
Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2003 8:01 pm
Location: Bendigo, Victoria, Australia

Post by Lazza »

jackcass wrote:
Lazza wrote:
jackcass wrote: Tempting isn't it. Mood seems to have lightened the last week or so, so maybe worth persevering.
You can put me on ignore any time Daz.

I'll just come up and tell you the same stuff when we meet anyway.... :twisted: :lol: 8)
Thanks Laz but your permission wasn't a requirement :wink:
At the very least I would have thought it was a common courtesy..... :twisted:
User avatar
slydog81
Posts: 601
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2011 11:16 am

Post by slydog81 »

Beams wanting out only 20% of it is due to his dad say Barrett.
We're always up to mischief!
User avatar
Bob Sugar
Posts: 7764
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 3:03 pm
Location: Benalla

Post by Bob Sugar »

slydog81 wrote:Beams wanting out only 20% of it is due to his dad say Barrett.
Yes, 22.5% is go home factor, and 57.5% is cash related.

Seriously though, if true he won't mind us trading him to the Dees for picks 2 and 3.
Defender...........

On the day before the first, Daicos created God.

You like this.
User avatar
John Wren
Posts: 24186
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:28 pm

Post by John Wren »

slydog81 wrote:Beams wanting out only 20% of it is due to his dad say Barrett.
the pendulum certainly is swinging.
Purveyor of sanctimonious twaddle.
User avatar
jackcass
Posts: 12529
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:17 pm
Location: Bendigo

Post by jackcass »

John Wren wrote:
slydog81 wrote:Beams wanting out only 20% of it is due to his dad say Barrett.
the pendulum certainly is swinging.
Be interesting to see what Beams has to say when this is all done and dusted.
User avatar
thompsoc
Posts: 6357
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 8:28 pm

Post by thompsoc »

Defender wrote:
slydog81 wrote:Beams wanting out only 20% of it is due to his dad say Barrett.
Yes, 22.5% is go home factor, and 57.5% is cash related.

Seriously though, if true he won't mind us trading him to the Dees for picks 2 and 3.
Sounds great - Beams to Dees for pick 2 and 3!
Go for it!
we don't eat our own at collingwood we just allow them to foul our nest.
User avatar
Piesnchess
Posts: 26205
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 4:24 pm
Has liked: 230 times
Been liked: 94 times

Post by Piesnchess »

Pick 4 and Aish, nothing less, or they can get rooted. !

Lock it in Pies, lock it in.
Poverty exists not because we cannot feed the poor, but because we cannot satisfy the rich.

Chess and Vodka are born brothers. - Russian proverb.
User avatar
Lazza
Posts: 12836
Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2003 8:01 pm
Location: Bendigo, Victoria, Australia

Post by Lazza »

Piesnchess wrote:Pick 4 and Aish, nothing less, or they can get rooted. !

Lock it in Pies, lock it in.
THIS^^^^^ :P
watt price tully
Posts: 20842
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 1:14 pm

Post by watt price tully »

I loved Eade's press conference saying at the end re the need for hard bodies & should Brisbane not come to the party (like for like) then we could have a midfield comprising: Greenwood, Beams & Pendles.

http://www.collingwoodfc.com.au/video/2 ... odney-eade
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
User avatar
rocketronnie
Posts: 8821
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 3:23 pm
Location: Reservoir

Post by rocketronnie »

watt price tully wrote:I loved Eade's press conference saying at the end re the need for hard bodies & should Brisbane not come to the party (like for like) then we could have a midfield comprising: Greenwood, Beams & Pendles.

http://www.collingwoodfc.com.au/video/2 ... odney-eade
Except Beams will have developed a mysterious ankle injury in the pre season and will be out for the year most likely. He doesnt want to play for us - period. Eade spinning a positive outcome for being forced to keep him because we asked too much is just stupid. And in that situation did he tell us how we should feel when Beams walks out and goes to Brisbane for nix in the draft in 2015? Sometimes I wonder why we keep that spud in a job...
"Only the weak believe that what they do in battle is who they are as men" - Thomas Marshall - "Ironclad".
watt price tully
Posts: 20842
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 1:14 pm

Post by watt price tully »

rocketronnie wrote:
watt price tully wrote:I loved Eade's press conference saying at the end re the need for hard bodies & should Brisbane not come to the party (like for like) then we could have a midfield comprising: Greenwood, Beams & Pendles.

http://www.collingwoodfc.com.au/video/2 ... odney-eade
Except Beams will have developed a mysterious ankle injury in the pre season and will be out for the year most likely. He doesnt want to play for us - period. Eade spinning a positive outcome for being forced to keep him because we asked too much is just stupid. And in that situation did he tell us how we should feel when Beams walks out and goes to Brisbane for nix in the draft in 2015? Sometimes I wonder why we keep that spud in a job...
Lay your cards on the table RR: exactly what should we ask for then in return from Brisbane for Beams?

What do you consider to be too low (unders) for a deal to be done that is, too unacceptably low for Collingwood to accede to a trade? What do you consider fair? What is acceptable?
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
User avatar
Flashman
Posts: 2019
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 7:03 pm

Post by Flashman »

User avatar
Brenny
Posts: 5253
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 10:56 pm
Location: Westpac Centre

Post by Brenny »

I know you shouldn't take what the Media say with too much belief.

BUT IF Beams is willing to be traded to GWS say, then that worries me from the POV that is there something else down at the club that Beams doesn't like. Is his dad and go home factor only a minor part of it.

I don't know, guess we will need to wait and see what happens come next week I guess.
User avatar
WarrenerraW
Posts: 5146
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2008 12:25 am
Location: Melbourne

Post by WarrenerraW »

If brisbane don't want to play then we offload his arse to the next highest bidder. why not gws? then he can be with his bum buddy heater. the dees? pick 3 sounds a lot tastier than 5 if you ask me. Or anyone else willing to cough up some serious compensation. I thought it was all about his dad being sick and wanting to be closer to him but the longer this drags on the more we here that that's only part of the reason. Obviously Bucks and the $$$ have a bit more to do with it probably more so than his dad being sick. His no show at the copeland showed his true colours.
Post Reply